Study of Image Contrast Recovery Coefficient (CRC) of a Large Ring PET Scanner

M. M. Ahasan, S. Akter, R. Khatun, M. F. Uddin, M. Islam, H. M. Jamil, A. N. Monika, M. A. Rahman, Rasel Das, M. Rahman, R. Sharmin, M. N. Khanam
{"title":"Study of Image Contrast Recovery Coefficient (CRC) of a Large Ring PET Scanner","authors":"M. M. Ahasan, S. Akter, R. Khatun, M. F. Uddin, M. Islam, H. M. Jamil, A. N. Monika, M. A. Rahman, Rasel Das, M. Rahman, R. Sharmin, M. N. Khanam","doi":"10.4236/IJMPCERO.2019.81005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Image contrast recovery coefficient (CRC) of a large ring PET scanner “macroPET” was studied with septa and without septa configuration by ac-quiring data from a laboratory made 35.7 cm square phantom filled with 18-F. Images were reconstructed with simple 2D filtered back projection using Hann, Hamming and Parsen filters with different cut-off frequencies aiming to investigate the influence of filter and cut-off frequency on image contrast with septa and without septa mode. Results indicate that the CRC, for both hot and cold lesions, is excellent for diameters ≥ 3 cm using cut-off frequencies > 0.4. For a 2 cm hot lesion CRC is around 0.8 to 0.9. CRC for 1 cm hot and cold lesions is ~0.3, as expected. There is surprisingly little difference between results with and without septa. For hot lesions, septa appear to improve CRC slightly, but for cold lesions CRC is slightly poorer using septa.","PeriodicalId":14028,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/IJMPCERO.2019.81005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Image contrast recovery coefficient (CRC) of a large ring PET scanner “macroPET” was studied with septa and without septa configuration by ac-quiring data from a laboratory made 35.7 cm square phantom filled with 18-F. Images were reconstructed with simple 2D filtered back projection using Hann, Hamming and Parsen filters with different cut-off frequencies aiming to investigate the influence of filter and cut-off frequency on image contrast with septa and without septa mode. Results indicate that the CRC, for both hot and cold lesions, is excellent for diameters ≥ 3 cm using cut-off frequencies > 0.4. For a 2 cm hot lesion CRC is around 0.8 to 0.9. CRC for 1 cm hot and cold lesions is ~0.3, as expected. There is surprisingly little difference between results with and without septa. For hot lesions, septa appear to improve CRC slightly, but for cold lesions CRC is slightly poorer using septa.
大型环形PET扫描仪图像对比度恢复系数的研究
通过采集实验室制作的357 cm方形18-F填充影模数据,研究了大环形PET扫描仪(macroPET)有间隔和无间隔配置时的图像对比度恢复系数(CRC)。采用不同截止频率的Hann、Hamming和Parsen滤波器对图像进行简单的二维滤波后反投影重建,研究滤波器和截止频率对有无间隔模式下图像对比度的影响。结果表明,对于热病变和冷病变,对于直径≥3 cm的CRC,使用截止频率> 0.4都是非常好的。对于2厘米的热病变,CRC约为0.8至0.9。1厘米冷热病变的CRC为~0.3,与预期一致。令人惊讶的是,有间隔和没有间隔的结果差别很小。对于热性病灶,隔层似乎能略微改善结直肠癌,但对于冷性病灶,隔层对结直肠癌的改善效果略差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信