{"title":"Sounds like ‘home’: The synchrony and dissonance of podcasting as boundary object","authors":"Erin Cory, Hugo Boothby","doi":"10.1386/rjao_00037_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Working at the intersection of migration studies and radio studies, we interrogate podcasting’s potential as a practice-based activist research method. This article documents podcasting’s role in an ethnographic project conducted together with Konstkupan (The Art Hive),\n a migrant-focused community arts space in Malmö, Sweden. We argue that the value of podcasting as a practice-based research method exists in its potential to function as a boundary object. Boundary objects are technologies and processes bridging social worlds and providing sites of communication\n and translation between groups. Challenging narratives that detect a decline in podcasting’s radical potential, we argue that as a boundary object, podcasting’s political significance continues in how it convenes small, diverse, but attentive ‘listening publics’. A\n boundary object does not demand consensus on the meanings or representations it produces, affording space for both the synchrony and dissonance of narratives produced by migrants.","PeriodicalId":38660,"journal":{"name":"Radio Journal","volume":"27 1","pages":"117-136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radio Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/rjao_00037_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Working at the intersection of migration studies and radio studies, we interrogate podcasting’s potential as a practice-based activist research method. This article documents podcasting’s role in an ethnographic project conducted together with Konstkupan (The Art Hive),
a migrant-focused community arts space in Malmö, Sweden. We argue that the value of podcasting as a practice-based research method exists in its potential to function as a boundary object. Boundary objects are technologies and processes bridging social worlds and providing sites of communication
and translation between groups. Challenging narratives that detect a decline in podcasting’s radical potential, we argue that as a boundary object, podcasting’s political significance continues in how it convenes small, diverse, but attentive ‘listening publics’. A
boundary object does not demand consensus on the meanings or representations it produces, affording space for both the synchrony and dissonance of narratives produced by migrants.
在移民研究和广播研究的交叉点上,我们质疑播客作为一种基于实践的活动家研究方法的潜力。这篇文章记录了播客在与Konstkupan (The Art Hive)合作的民族志项目中的作用,Konstkupan是瑞典Malmö的一个以移民为重点的社区艺术空间。我们认为,播客作为一种基于实践的研究方法的价值在于其作为边界对象的潜力。边界对象是连接社会世界的技术和过程,并提供群体之间交流和翻译的场所。挑战叙事,发现播客的激进潜力的下降,我们认为,作为一个边界对象,播客的政治意义继续在于它如何召集小,多样,但细心的“倾听公众”。边界对象并不要求就其产生的意义或表现达成共识,为移民产生的叙事提供了同步和不协调的空间。
Radio JournalArts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍:
Radio Journal publishes critical analyses of radio and sound media across a variety of platforms, from broadcast to podcast and all in between. Articles focus on both historical and contemporary issues in sound-based journalism and media studies. We look for work that explores the production, circulation and reception of radio and creative soundwork, and encourage a wide range of international and interdisciplinary perspectives. Radio Journal welcomes scholarship from early career researchers as well as internationally renowned scholars. It also publishes reviews of recent publications in the field of radio and sound studies. Radio Journal is edited from the US and Australia and has an international scope. It is a refereed publication; all research articles undergo rigorous double-blind peer review. The editors will review other contributions. The process normally takes three months to complete.