The search for integrated paradigms of care for people with mental illness who offend: the enabling personality of Eric Broekaert

IF 0.1 Q4 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
F. V. Laenen, T. Beken
{"title":"The search for integrated paradigms of care for people with mental illness who offend: the enabling personality of Eric Broekaert","authors":"F. V. Laenen, T. Beken","doi":"10.1108/TC-01-2017-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose \n \n \n \n \nAs a tribute to Eric Broekaert, the purpose of this paper is to look back at a 2004 paper he wrote on the integration of paradigms of care and reports on how this is reflected in an ongoing multidisciplinary study at Ghent University. \n \n \n \n \nDesign/methodology/approach \n \n \n \n \nIn 2014, the authors began a research project to develop multidisciplinary strengths-based strategies for a vulnerable group of people, in this case people with a mental illness who offend. The authors chose a strength-based research design for the study, in order to focus on individuals’ capabilities, qualities and assets, rather than on deficits, incapacities or problems. \n \n \n \n \nFindings \n \n \n \n \nThree elements from Eric Broekaert’s work have inspired the research project. First, it is not possible to carry out research and interact with vulnerable persons devoid of the political, social and cultural context. Second, the authors should not restrict to one discipline or one paradigm when building (academic) knowledge and in practice. Third, the central aim of any practice should be to empower vulnerable people, improve their quality of life and challenge aspects of society that alienate and exclude them. \n \n \n \n \nOriginality/value \n \n \n \n \nEric Broekaert’s belief in the power of encounter and integration, reflected in his 2004 paper, continues to influence this work. As an open-minded enabler and critical integrator, he has left very visible traces in the research environment at Ghent University and beyond. Inspired by his thoughts and personality, new generations of researchers across many disciplines follow in his footsteps, jointly searching for what unites us as human beings rather than what divides us.","PeriodicalId":43236,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Communities","volume":"37 1","pages":"163-168"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Communities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/TC-01-2017-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Purpose As a tribute to Eric Broekaert, the purpose of this paper is to look back at a 2004 paper he wrote on the integration of paradigms of care and reports on how this is reflected in an ongoing multidisciplinary study at Ghent University. Design/methodology/approach In 2014, the authors began a research project to develop multidisciplinary strengths-based strategies for a vulnerable group of people, in this case people with a mental illness who offend. The authors chose a strength-based research design for the study, in order to focus on individuals’ capabilities, qualities and assets, rather than on deficits, incapacities or problems. Findings Three elements from Eric Broekaert’s work have inspired the research project. First, it is not possible to carry out research and interact with vulnerable persons devoid of the political, social and cultural context. Second, the authors should not restrict to one discipline or one paradigm when building (academic) knowledge and in practice. Third, the central aim of any practice should be to empower vulnerable people, improve their quality of life and challenge aspects of society that alienate and exclude them. Originality/value Eric Broekaert’s belief in the power of encounter and integration, reflected in his 2004 paper, continues to influence this work. As an open-minded enabler and critical integrator, he has left very visible traces in the research environment at Ghent University and beyond. Inspired by his thoughts and personality, new generations of researchers across many disciplines follow in his footsteps, jointly searching for what unites us as human beings rather than what divides us.
对犯罪的精神疾病患者的综合治疗范例的探索:埃里克·布罗卡尔特的使能人格
作为对Eric Broekaert的致敬,本文的目的是回顾他在2004年写的一篇关于护理范式整合的论文,并报告这在根特大学正在进行的多学科研究中是如何反映的。设计/方法/方法2014年,作者开始了一项研究项目,为弱势群体开发基于优势的多学科策略,在这种情况下,患有精神疾病的人会犯罪。作者为这项研究选择了一种基于力量的研究设计,以便关注个人的能力、素质和资产,而不是缺陷、无能或问题。Eric Broekaert工作中的三个元素启发了这个研究项目。首先,如果没有政治、社会和文化背景,就不可能开展研究并与弱势群体互动。其次,作者在建立(学术)知识和实践时不应局限于一门学科或一种范式。第三,任何做法的中心目标都应该是赋予弱势群体权力,改善他们的生活质量,并挑战疏远和排斥他们的社会方面。Eric Broekaert在他2004年的论文中反映的对相遇和整合力量的信念继续影响着这项工作。作为一个思想开放的推动者和关键的整合者,他在根特大学和其他地方的研究环境中留下了非常明显的痕迹。在他的思想和个性的启发下,新一代跨越多个学科的研究人员追随他的脚步,共同寻找将我们作为人类团结起来的东西,而不是分裂我们的东西。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutic Communities
Therapeutic Communities SUBSTANCE ABUSE-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
50.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes academic papers, case studies, empirical research and opinion. The Journal is interested in publishing papers that critically creatively engage with ideas drawn from a range of discourses: the therapeutic community movement and other related professional practice, psychoanalysis, art, literature, poetry, music, architecture, culture, education, philosophy, religion and environmental studies. It will be of value to those who work in health services, social services, voluntary and charitable organizations and for all professionals involved with staff teams in therapeutic and supportive organizations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信