Australian attitudes towards innovation, work and technology: Towards a cultural explanation

Q4 Arts and Humanities
M. Charles, N. Ryan, D. Tuffley, D. Noble, R. Stonecash
{"title":"Australian attitudes towards innovation, work and technology: Towards\n a cultural explanation","authors":"M. Charles, N. Ryan, D. Tuffley, D. Noble, R. Stonecash","doi":"10.13169/prometheus.37.1.0054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Australia, despite its G20 status, has not been performing as well in innovation\n in high-technology sectors as its educational levels and sustained growth would\n suggest. Australia has found it difficult to emerge from an economy based on\n resources and agriculture to a services economy based on knowledge and the\n application of technology. Several reasons have been put forward over the years.\n This study considers one reason that has not been considered in any detail –\n culture and national identity. In this paper, we look closely at a number of\n artefacts of popular culture from the late 1800s to the present day (such as\n art, poetry, song and film). These continue to underpin Australia's national\n identity, despite the multicultural and multiethnic nature of modern Australia.\n This study argues that the current Australian attitude to work, technology and\n innovation is strongly rooted in the egalitarian and anti-authoritarian ethos\n associated with what has been termed the 'Australian legend' or the 'pioneer\n legend'. A national discourse with emphasis on hyper-masculine hard work as\n opposed to education and innovation has favoured policies to assist the resource\n and agricultural sectors of the economy, rather than sectors capable of creating\n greater value.","PeriodicalId":38494,"journal":{"name":"Prometheus (Italy)","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prometheus (Italy)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13169/prometheus.37.1.0054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Australia, despite its G20 status, has not been performing as well in innovation in high-technology sectors as its educational levels and sustained growth would suggest. Australia has found it difficult to emerge from an economy based on resources and agriculture to a services economy based on knowledge and the application of technology. Several reasons have been put forward over the years. This study considers one reason that has not been considered in any detail – culture and national identity. In this paper, we look closely at a number of artefacts of popular culture from the late 1800s to the present day (such as art, poetry, song and film). These continue to underpin Australia's national identity, despite the multicultural and multiethnic nature of modern Australia. This study argues that the current Australian attitude to work, technology and innovation is strongly rooted in the egalitarian and anti-authoritarian ethos associated with what has been termed the 'Australian legend' or the 'pioneer legend'. A national discourse with emphasis on hyper-masculine hard work as opposed to education and innovation has favoured policies to assist the resource and agricultural sectors of the economy, rather than sectors capable of creating greater value.
澳大利亚人对创新、工作和技术的态度:走向文化解释
尽管澳大利亚是20国集团成员,但在高科技领域的创新表现并不像其教育水平和持续增长所表明的那样好。澳大利亚发现很难从以资源和农业为基础的经济转变为以知识和技术应用为基础的服务经济。多年来,人们提出了几个原因。这项研究考虑了一个没有被详细考虑的原因——文化和民族认同。在本文中,我们仔细研究了从19世纪末到现在的流行文化(如艺术、诗歌、歌曲和电影)的一些人工制品。尽管现代澳大利亚具有多元文化和多民族的性质,但这些仍然支撑着澳大利亚的民族认同。这项研究认为,目前澳大利亚人对工作、技术和创新的态度深深植根于平等主义和反威权主义的精神,这种精神被称为“澳大利亚传奇”或“先锋传奇”。一种强调男性化的努力工作,而不是教育和创新的全国性话语,倾向于支持资源和农业经济部门的政策,而不是能够创造更大价值的部门。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prometheus (Italy)
Prometheus (Italy) Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信