M. Charles, N. Ryan, D. Tuffley, D. Noble, R. Stonecash
{"title":"Australian attitudes towards innovation, work and technology: Towards\n a cultural explanation","authors":"M. Charles, N. Ryan, D. Tuffley, D. Noble, R. Stonecash","doi":"10.13169/prometheus.37.1.0054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Australia, despite its G20 status, has not been performing as well in innovation\n in high-technology sectors as its educational levels and sustained growth would\n suggest. Australia has found it difficult to emerge from an economy based on\n resources and agriculture to a services economy based on knowledge and the\n application of technology. Several reasons have been put forward over the years.\n This study considers one reason that has not been considered in any detail –\n culture and national identity. In this paper, we look closely at a number of\n artefacts of popular culture from the late 1800s to the present day (such as\n art, poetry, song and film). These continue to underpin Australia's national\n identity, despite the multicultural and multiethnic nature of modern Australia.\n This study argues that the current Australian attitude to work, technology and\n innovation is strongly rooted in the egalitarian and anti-authoritarian ethos\n associated with what has been termed the 'Australian legend' or the 'pioneer\n legend'. A national discourse with emphasis on hyper-masculine hard work as\n opposed to education and innovation has favoured policies to assist the resource\n and agricultural sectors of the economy, rather than sectors capable of creating\n greater value.","PeriodicalId":38494,"journal":{"name":"Prometheus (Italy)","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prometheus (Italy)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13169/prometheus.37.1.0054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Australia, despite its G20 status, has not been performing as well in innovation
in high-technology sectors as its educational levels and sustained growth would
suggest. Australia has found it difficult to emerge from an economy based on
resources and agriculture to a services economy based on knowledge and the
application of technology. Several reasons have been put forward over the years.
This study considers one reason that has not been considered in any detail –
culture and national identity. In this paper, we look closely at a number of
artefacts of popular culture from the late 1800s to the present day (such as
art, poetry, song and film). These continue to underpin Australia's national
identity, despite the multicultural and multiethnic nature of modern Australia.
This study argues that the current Australian attitude to work, technology and
innovation is strongly rooted in the egalitarian and anti-authoritarian ethos
associated with what has been termed the 'Australian legend' or the 'pioneer
legend'. A national discourse with emphasis on hyper-masculine hard work as
opposed to education and innovation has favoured policies to assist the resource
and agricultural sectors of the economy, rather than sectors capable of creating
greater value.