Quality Effects on User Preferences and Behaviorsin Mobile News Streaming

Hongyu Lu, Min Zhang, Weizhi Ma, Yunqiu Shao, Yiqun Liu, Shaoping Ma
{"title":"Quality Effects on User Preferences and Behaviorsin Mobile News Streaming","authors":"Hongyu Lu, Min Zhang, Weizhi Ma, Yunqiu Shao, Yiqun Liu, Shaoping Ma","doi":"10.1145/3308558.3313751","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"User behaviors are widely used as implicit feedbacks of user preferences in personalized information systems. In previous works and online applications, the user's click signals are used as positive feedback for ranking, recommendation, evaluation, etc. However, when users click on a piece of low-quality news, they are more likely to have negative experiences and different reading behaviors. Hence, the ignorance of the quality effects of news may lead to the misinterpretation of user behaviors as well as consequence studies. To address these issues, we conducted an in-depth user study in mobile news streaming scenario to investigate whether and how the quality of news may affect user preferences and user behaviors. Firstly, we verify that quality does affect user preferences, and low-quality news results in a lower preference. We further find that this effect varies with both interaction phases and user's interest in the topic of the news. Secondly, we inspect how users interact with low-quality news. Surprisingly, we find that users are more likely to click on low-quality news because of its high title persuasion. Moreover, users will read less and slower with fewer revisits and examinations while reading the low-quality news. Based on these quality effects we have discovered, we propose the Preference Behavior Quality (PBQ) probability model which incorporates the quality into traditional behavior-only implicit feedback. The significant improvement demonstrates that incorporating quality can help build implicit feedback. Since the importance and difficulty in collecting news quality, we further investigate how to identify it automatically. Based on point-wise and pair-wise distinguishing experiments, we show that user behaviors, especially reading ratio and dwell time, have high ability to identify news quality. Our research has comprehensively analyzed the effects of quality on user preferences and behaviors, and raised the awareness of item quality in interpreting user behaviors and estimating user preferences.","PeriodicalId":23013,"journal":{"name":"The World Wide Web Conference","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The World Wide Web Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3308558.3313751","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

User behaviors are widely used as implicit feedbacks of user preferences in personalized information systems. In previous works and online applications, the user's click signals are used as positive feedback for ranking, recommendation, evaluation, etc. However, when users click on a piece of low-quality news, they are more likely to have negative experiences and different reading behaviors. Hence, the ignorance of the quality effects of news may lead to the misinterpretation of user behaviors as well as consequence studies. To address these issues, we conducted an in-depth user study in mobile news streaming scenario to investigate whether and how the quality of news may affect user preferences and user behaviors. Firstly, we verify that quality does affect user preferences, and low-quality news results in a lower preference. We further find that this effect varies with both interaction phases and user's interest in the topic of the news. Secondly, we inspect how users interact with low-quality news. Surprisingly, we find that users are more likely to click on low-quality news because of its high title persuasion. Moreover, users will read less and slower with fewer revisits and examinations while reading the low-quality news. Based on these quality effects we have discovered, we propose the Preference Behavior Quality (PBQ) probability model which incorporates the quality into traditional behavior-only implicit feedback. The significant improvement demonstrates that incorporating quality can help build implicit feedback. Since the importance and difficulty in collecting news quality, we further investigate how to identify it automatically. Based on point-wise and pair-wise distinguishing experiments, we show that user behaviors, especially reading ratio and dwell time, have high ability to identify news quality. Our research has comprehensively analyzed the effects of quality on user preferences and behaviors, and raised the awareness of item quality in interpreting user behaviors and estimating user preferences.
移动新闻流中用户偏好和行为的质量影响
在个性化信息系统中,用户行为作为用户偏好的隐式反馈被广泛应用。在以往的作品和在线应用中,用户的点击信号被用作正反馈,用于排名、推荐、评价等。然而,当用户点击一条低质量的新闻时,他们更有可能产生负面的体验和不同的阅读行为。因此,忽视新闻的质量效应可能会导致对用户行为和后果研究的误解。为了解决这些问题,我们对移动新闻流场景进行了深入的用户研究,以调查新闻质量是否以及如何影响用户偏好和用户行为。首先,我们验证了质量确实会影响用户偏好,而低质量的新闻会导致更低的偏好。我们进一步发现,这种影响随交互阶段和用户对新闻主题的兴趣而变化。其次,我们考察用户如何与低质量新闻互动。令人惊讶的是,我们发现用户更有可能点击低质量的新闻,因为它的标题说服力很强。此外,在阅读低质量的新闻时,用户会阅读更少、更慢、更少的访问和检查。基于这些质量效应,我们提出了偏好行为质量(PBQ)概率模型,该模型将质量纳入传统的纯行为隐式反馈中。显著的改进表明,结合质量可以帮助建立隐式反馈。鉴于新闻质量采集的重要性和难度,我们进一步研究了如何对新闻质量进行自动识别。基于点对和对对区分实验,我们发现用户行为,特别是阅读率和停留时间,对新闻质量有很高的识别能力。我们的研究全面分析了质量对用户偏好和行为的影响,提高了对商品质量在解释用户行为和估计用户偏好方面的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信