Scenarios warranting modified treatment regimens in leprosy: A 5-year retrospective study from a tertiary care center

Celia Hamlet, P. Nair
{"title":"Scenarios warranting modified treatment regimens in leprosy: A 5-year retrospective study from a tertiary care center","authors":"Celia Hamlet, P. Nair","doi":"10.25259/jsstd_10_2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To study the scenarios warranting modified treatment regimens in leprosy.\n\n\n\nA 5-year retrospective study was carried out in a tertiary care center by analyzing the data collected from national leprosy eradication program (NLEP) records.\n\n\n\nDuring the 5-year study period, 171 patients received treatment for leprosy from our center. Thirtyone patients (31/171, 18.1%) required substitution of standard multidrug therapy (MDT) with alternate drugs or required alternate treatment regimens. The patients who required modified treatment included 18 men (18/31, 58.1%) and 13 women (41.9%). Male/female ratio was 1.4:1. Indications for treatment modification were adverse drug reactions to standard MDT (ADR) (21/31, 67.7%) and lack of response to standard MDT (10/31, 32.3%). The most common scenario that warranted a modification of standard MDT was dapsone-induced hemolysis (12/31, 38.7%). Seven (7/31, 22.6%) and two (2/31, 6.5%) patients needed a change in treatment due to drug-induced hepatitis and drug-induced maculopapular rash, respectively.\n\n\n\nRetrospective study design, study conducted in single tertiary referral center and small sample size were the limitations.\n\n\n\nNearly one-fifth of patients with leprosy required modifications in standard MDT. The most common indication (in two-third of patients who needed a modified treatment) for modification of treatment regimen was adverse drug reactions.","PeriodicalId":17051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Skin and Sexually Transmitted Diseases","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Skin and Sexually Transmitted Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/jsstd_10_2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

To study the scenarios warranting modified treatment regimens in leprosy. A 5-year retrospective study was carried out in a tertiary care center by analyzing the data collected from national leprosy eradication program (NLEP) records. During the 5-year study period, 171 patients received treatment for leprosy from our center. Thirtyone patients (31/171, 18.1%) required substitution of standard multidrug therapy (MDT) with alternate drugs or required alternate treatment regimens. The patients who required modified treatment included 18 men (18/31, 58.1%) and 13 women (41.9%). Male/female ratio was 1.4:1. Indications for treatment modification were adverse drug reactions to standard MDT (ADR) (21/31, 67.7%) and lack of response to standard MDT (10/31, 32.3%). The most common scenario that warranted a modification of standard MDT was dapsone-induced hemolysis (12/31, 38.7%). Seven (7/31, 22.6%) and two (2/31, 6.5%) patients needed a change in treatment due to drug-induced hepatitis and drug-induced maculopapular rash, respectively. Retrospective study design, study conducted in single tertiary referral center and small sample size were the limitations. Nearly one-fifth of patients with leprosy required modifications in standard MDT. The most common indication (in two-third of patients who needed a modified treatment) for modification of treatment regimen was adverse drug reactions.
麻风病需修改治疗方案的情况:来自三级保健中心的5年回顾性研究
研究改变麻风病治疗方案的情况。通过分析从国家麻风根除计划(NLEP)记录中收集的数据,在一家三级保健中心进行了一项为期5年的回顾性研究。在5年的研究期间,171名患者接受了我们中心的麻风病治疗。31例(31/171,18.1%)患者需要用替代药物替代标准多药治疗(MDT)或需要替代治疗方案。需要改良治疗的患者中男性18例(18/31,58.1%),女性13例(41.9%)。男女比例为1.4:1。调整治疗的适应症为标准MDT不良反应(ADR)(21/31, 67.7%)和标准MDT无反应(10/31,32.3%)。需要修改标准MDT的最常见情况是氨苯砜诱导的溶血(12/31,38.7%)。7例(7/31,22.6%)和2例(2/31,6.5%)患者因药物性肝炎和药物性黄斑丘疹需要改变治疗。回顾性研究设计、在单一三级转诊中心进行的研究和小样本量是研究的局限性。近五分之一的麻风病患者需要修改标准MDT。修改治疗方案最常见的适应症(三分之二的患者需要修改治疗方案)是药物不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信