{"title":"Scenarios warranting modified treatment regimens in leprosy: A 5-year retrospective study from a tertiary care center","authors":"Celia Hamlet, P. Nair","doi":"10.25259/jsstd_10_2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To study the scenarios warranting modified treatment regimens in leprosy.\n\n\n\nA 5-year retrospective study was carried out in a tertiary care center by analyzing the data collected from national leprosy eradication program (NLEP) records.\n\n\n\nDuring the 5-year study period, 171 patients received treatment for leprosy from our center. Thirtyone patients (31/171, 18.1%) required substitution of standard multidrug therapy (MDT) with alternate drugs or required alternate treatment regimens. The patients who required modified treatment included 18 men (18/31, 58.1%) and 13 women (41.9%). Male/female ratio was 1.4:1. Indications for treatment modification were adverse drug reactions to standard MDT (ADR) (21/31, 67.7%) and lack of response to standard MDT (10/31, 32.3%). The most common scenario that warranted a modification of standard MDT was dapsone-induced hemolysis (12/31, 38.7%). Seven (7/31, 22.6%) and two (2/31, 6.5%) patients needed a change in treatment due to drug-induced hepatitis and drug-induced maculopapular rash, respectively.\n\n\n\nRetrospective study design, study conducted in single tertiary referral center and small sample size were the limitations.\n\n\n\nNearly one-fifth of patients with leprosy required modifications in standard MDT. The most common indication (in two-third of patients who needed a modified treatment) for modification of treatment regimen was adverse drug reactions.","PeriodicalId":17051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Skin and Sexually Transmitted Diseases","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Skin and Sexually Transmitted Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/jsstd_10_2023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
To study the scenarios warranting modified treatment regimens in leprosy.
A 5-year retrospective study was carried out in a tertiary care center by analyzing the data collected from national leprosy eradication program (NLEP) records.
During the 5-year study period, 171 patients received treatment for leprosy from our center. Thirtyone patients (31/171, 18.1%) required substitution of standard multidrug therapy (MDT) with alternate drugs or required alternate treatment regimens. The patients who required modified treatment included 18 men (18/31, 58.1%) and 13 women (41.9%). Male/female ratio was 1.4:1. Indications for treatment modification were adverse drug reactions to standard MDT (ADR) (21/31, 67.7%) and lack of response to standard MDT (10/31, 32.3%). The most common scenario that warranted a modification of standard MDT was dapsone-induced hemolysis (12/31, 38.7%). Seven (7/31, 22.6%) and two (2/31, 6.5%) patients needed a change in treatment due to drug-induced hepatitis and drug-induced maculopapular rash, respectively.
Retrospective study design, study conducted in single tertiary referral center and small sample size were the limitations.
Nearly one-fifth of patients with leprosy required modifications in standard MDT. The most common indication (in two-third of patients who needed a modified treatment) for modification of treatment regimen was adverse drug reactions.