The impact of using multimedia on students’ academic achievement in the College of Education at King Saud University

Sara Aloraini
{"title":"The impact of using multimedia on students’ academic achievement in the College of Education at King Saud University","authors":"Sara Aloraini","doi":"10.1016/j.jksult.2012.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The purpose of this study is to find out the impact of using multimedia on students’ academic achievement in the College of Education at King Saud University. This study’s effort is to answer the following questions:</p><p></p><ul><li><span>•</span><span><p>What is the impact of using multimedia on students’ academic achievement in the “computer &amp; its use in education” curriculum?</p></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><p>Are there any statistically-significant differences between the average marks of the experimental group &amp; that of the control group in the pre &amp; post measurements of students’ academic achievement in the school of Education?</p></span></li></ul><p>To this end, an experiment of two equivalent groups was designed, one of the groups is experimental &amp; the other is control; each of them consists of 20 female students. The lecture was given to the first group using a computer presentation program which uses multimedia treated as an experimental group, while the second group was given the same lecture using the traditional method which uses the dialog &amp; discussion technique treated as a control group.Both groups were subjected to pre &amp; post tests in the subject tackled by the lecture. The analysis result of the pre test showed no statistically-significant differences, which in turn proves the equivalence of the two groups. Meanwhile, the analysis result of the post test showed the following: There are statistically-significant differences between the experimental group and the control group at a significance level of 0.05 for the interest of the experimental group.</p><p>Both groups were subjected to pre &amp; post tests in the subject tackled by the lecture. The analysis result of the pre test showed no statistically-significant differences, which in turn proves the equivalence of the two groups. Meanwhile, the analysis result of the post test showed the following: There are statistically-significant differences between the experimental group and the control group at a significance level of 0.05 for the interest of the experimental group.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of King Saud University - Languages and Translation","volume":"24 2","pages":"Pages 75-82"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jksult.2012.05.002","citationCount":"133","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of King Saud University - Languages and Translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210831912000033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 133

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out the impact of using multimedia on students’ academic achievement in the College of Education at King Saud University. This study’s effort is to answer the following questions:

  • What is the impact of using multimedia on students’ academic achievement in the “computer & its use in education” curriculum?

  • Are there any statistically-significant differences between the average marks of the experimental group & that of the control group in the pre & post measurements of students’ academic achievement in the school of Education?

To this end, an experiment of two equivalent groups was designed, one of the groups is experimental & the other is control; each of them consists of 20 female students. The lecture was given to the first group using a computer presentation program which uses multimedia treated as an experimental group, while the second group was given the same lecture using the traditional method which uses the dialog & discussion technique treated as a control group.Both groups were subjected to pre & post tests in the subject tackled by the lecture. The analysis result of the pre test showed no statistically-significant differences, which in turn proves the equivalence of the two groups. Meanwhile, the analysis result of the post test showed the following: There are statistically-significant differences between the experimental group and the control group at a significance level of 0.05 for the interest of the experimental group.

Both groups were subjected to pre & post tests in the subject tackled by the lecture. The analysis result of the pre test showed no statistically-significant differences, which in turn proves the equivalence of the two groups. Meanwhile, the analysis result of the post test showed the following: There are statistically-significant differences between the experimental group and the control group at a significance level of 0.05 for the interest of the experimental group.

沙特国王大学教育学院使用多媒体对学生学业成绩的影响
本研究的目的是了解在沙特国王大学教育学院使用多媒体对学生学业成绩的影响。本研究旨在回答以下问题:•使用多媒体对学生在“计算机&;它在教育课程中的应用?•实验组的平均分是否有统计学上的显著差异& &;对照组在前&学生在教育学院学习成绩的后期测量?为此,设计了两个等效组的实验,其中一组为实验&另一个是控制;每个班由20名女学生组成。第一组使用计算机演示程序进行讲座,该程序使用多媒体作为实验组,而第二组使用传统方法进行相同的讲座,使用对话框&讨论技术作为对照组。两组都接受了预&讲座所涉及主题的后测。前测分析结果无统计学差异,证明两组的等效性。同时,后验分析结果显示:实验组与对照组的兴趣水平差异有统计学意义,显著性水平为0.05。两组都接受了预&讲座所涉及主题的后测。前测分析结果无统计学差异,证明两组的等效性。同时,后验分析结果显示:实验组与对照组的兴趣水平差异有统计学意义,显著性水平为0.05。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信