Unpacking algorithms as technologies of power: Syrian refugees and data experts on algorithmic governance

Tayfun Kasapoglu , Anu Masso , Stefano Calzati
{"title":"Unpacking algorithms as technologies of power: Syrian refugees and data experts on algorithmic governance","authors":"Tayfun Kasapoglu ,&nbsp;Anu Masso ,&nbsp;Stefano Calzati","doi":"10.1016/j.diggeo.2021.100016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The article explores algorithmic governance through the lenses of Foucault's work on governmentality. Algorithms are understood as “technologies of power” that literally “subjectify” the individuals upon which they act. Our main focus is on Syrian refugees in two national contexts - Estonia and Turkey - and we consider four types of algorithms to which refugees are subjected: relocation, police risk scoring, recommendation algorithms and online advertisements. The goal is to explore the “algorithmic imaginaries” of both refugees and Estonian experts who work with migration data about these technologies, via a series of interviews with 19 refugees and 24 data experts. Our findings show that, while relocation and police risk scoring algorithms are perceived as technologies of power responsible for producing macro-differences without paying sufficient attention to individual needs, recommendation and ad algorithms are seen as less threatening, i.e. as “technologies of the self”. From here, we suggest reconsidering algorithmic governance as an iterative practice to eventually transform the datafied “knowledge of the self”, suitable for algorithms, into a true “care of the self”.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100377,"journal":{"name":"Digital Geography and Society","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100016"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.diggeo.2021.100016","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digital Geography and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666378321000076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The article explores algorithmic governance through the lenses of Foucault's work on governmentality. Algorithms are understood as “technologies of power” that literally “subjectify” the individuals upon which they act. Our main focus is on Syrian refugees in two national contexts - Estonia and Turkey - and we consider four types of algorithms to which refugees are subjected: relocation, police risk scoring, recommendation algorithms and online advertisements. The goal is to explore the “algorithmic imaginaries” of both refugees and Estonian experts who work with migration data about these technologies, via a series of interviews with 19 refugees and 24 data experts. Our findings show that, while relocation and police risk scoring algorithms are perceived as technologies of power responsible for producing macro-differences without paying sufficient attention to individual needs, recommendation and ad algorithms are seen as less threatening, i.e. as “technologies of the self”. From here, we suggest reconsidering algorithmic governance as an iterative practice to eventually transform the datafied “knowledge of the self”, suitable for algorithms, into a true “care of the self”.

将算法分解为权力技术:叙利亚难民和算法治理方面的数据专家
本文通过福柯关于治理的研究来探讨算法治理。算法被理解为“权力的技术”,它将其行动所依赖的个人“主体化”。我们主要关注的是两个国家背景下的叙利亚难民——爱沙尼亚和土耳其——我们考虑了难民所面临的四种算法:重新安置、警察风险评分、推荐算法和在线广告。目标是通过对19名难民和24名数据专家的一系列采访,探索难民和爱沙尼亚专家的“算法想象”,这些专家与这些技术有关的移民数据。我们的研究结果表明,虽然搬迁和警察风险评分算法被认为是在没有充分关注个人需求的情况下产生宏观差异的权力技术,但推荐和广告算法被视为威胁性较低,即“自我技术”。在此,我们建议将算法治理重新考虑为一种迭代实践,最终将适合算法的数据化的“自我知识”转化为真正的“自我关怀”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信