FRACTURE STRENGTH OF POROUS CERAMICS: STRESS CONCENTRATION VS MINIMUM SOLID AREA MODELS

F. Nyongesa, B. O. Aduda
{"title":"FRACTURE STRENGTH OF POROUS CERAMICS: STRESS CONCENTRATION VS MINIMUM SOLID AREA MODELS","authors":"F. Nyongesa, B. O. Aduda","doi":"10.4314/AJST.V5I2.15336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we have reviewed recently published strength-porosity data of porous ceramics, and compared these data with those computed from both the minimum contact solid area (MCA) and the pore stress concentration effect (SCE) models. We observed that the theoretical data (MCA model) matched better the experimental results of ceramics in the low volume fraction porosity range (P 0.25), the SCE model better predicts the experimental results. African Journal of Science and Technology Vol. 5(2) 2004: 19-27","PeriodicalId":7641,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Science and Technology","volume":"112 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/AJST.V5I2.15336","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

In this study, we have reviewed recently published strength-porosity data of porous ceramics, and compared these data with those computed from both the minimum contact solid area (MCA) and the pore stress concentration effect (SCE) models. We observed that the theoretical data (MCA model) matched better the experimental results of ceramics in the low volume fraction porosity range (P 0.25), the SCE model better predicts the experimental results. African Journal of Science and Technology Vol. 5(2) 2004: 19-27
多孔陶瓷的断裂强度:应力集中与最小固体面积模型
在这项研究中,我们回顾了最近发表的多孔陶瓷的强度-孔隙率数据,并将这些数据与最小接触固体面积(MCA)和孔隙应力集中效应(SCE)模型的计算结果进行了比较。我们观察到,在低体积分数孔隙率范围内,理论数据(MCA模型)与实验结果吻合较好(P = 0.25), SCE模型更能预测实验结果。非洲科学技术杂志,Vol. 5(2) 2004: 19-27
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信