Technical Economical and Risk Analysis Methodology for Defining the Optimum Positioning of the Electrical Submersible Pump System for Production of Heavy Oil in Deep Water

B. Cavalcante, J. S. Baioco, B. P. Jacob, Nicolas Paes Urupukina
{"title":"Technical Economical and Risk Analysis Methodology for Defining the Optimum Positioning of the Electrical Submersible Pump System for Production of Heavy Oil in Deep Water","authors":"B. Cavalcante, J. S. Baioco, B. P. Jacob, Nicolas Paes Urupukina","doi":"10.4043/29775-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In an oil field development, the choice of the appropriate artificial lift method is extremely important to obtain the best financial return for the project. The most efficient artificial lift method for heavy oil is the ESP, in the perspective of lift capacity and flow assurance, but, due to its low MTTF (Mean Time to Failure), in some cases, the associated cost for the offshore workovers is prohibitive. An alternative to reduce the cost of the workover is positioning the ESP in the seabed, in a pumping skid (Subsea ESP / skid-ESP). Positioning the ESP in the seabed, however, reduces the initial well flow rate. Most commonly, the Artificial Lift Method is chosen based on the previews experience of the operator, not giving appropriate effort to a technical and commercial evaluation. This paper proposes a methodology to provide quantitative data to assist the decision of the best positioning of the pumping system, inside the well or on the seabed, in order to obtain the best financial return.\n The methodology is based on three stages: technical evaluation, which is an eliminatory step, based on the GVF (Gas Volume Fraction) limit that the pump can handle without flowing problems; then, an economical and risk analysis are performed for both projects (ESP and skid-ESP). Three case studies were performed to evaluate the proposed methodology, and to confirm that it is a good tool to assist the decision of the best positioning of the pumping system.\n The results show that the three stages proposed are important. One of the three cases show a scenario where the skid-ESP is declassified in the first step of the methodology because of the high GVF calculated for the project, above the limit for this specific well. In the other two cases all the three stages of the methodology were applied. The economical deterministic analysis was not enough to define the best positioning of the pumping system, in order to obtain the highest financial return, and the probabilistic risk analysis was essential to obtain quantitative data to support an efficient decision. In both cases the suggested positioning of the pumping system was the seabed (skid-ESP or subsea ESP).\n In the literature, some works propose methodologies to choose the appropriate artificial lift method. Some of them offer an economical evaluation tool; but a methodology that includes the subsea ESP as an option for heavy oil deep water projects was not found in the literature. This paper proposes a methodology that can be easily applied with the software's commonly used in the industry, therefore adding information to the existing body of literature that can benefit practicing engineers.","PeriodicalId":11089,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Wed, October 30, 2019","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Wed, October 30, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/29775-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In an oil field development, the choice of the appropriate artificial lift method is extremely important to obtain the best financial return for the project. The most efficient artificial lift method for heavy oil is the ESP, in the perspective of lift capacity and flow assurance, but, due to its low MTTF (Mean Time to Failure), in some cases, the associated cost for the offshore workovers is prohibitive. An alternative to reduce the cost of the workover is positioning the ESP in the seabed, in a pumping skid (Subsea ESP / skid-ESP). Positioning the ESP in the seabed, however, reduces the initial well flow rate. Most commonly, the Artificial Lift Method is chosen based on the previews experience of the operator, not giving appropriate effort to a technical and commercial evaluation. This paper proposes a methodology to provide quantitative data to assist the decision of the best positioning of the pumping system, inside the well or on the seabed, in order to obtain the best financial return. The methodology is based on three stages: technical evaluation, which is an eliminatory step, based on the GVF (Gas Volume Fraction) limit that the pump can handle without flowing problems; then, an economical and risk analysis are performed for both projects (ESP and skid-ESP). Three case studies were performed to evaluate the proposed methodology, and to confirm that it is a good tool to assist the decision of the best positioning of the pumping system. The results show that the three stages proposed are important. One of the three cases show a scenario where the skid-ESP is declassified in the first step of the methodology because of the high GVF calculated for the project, above the limit for this specific well. In the other two cases all the three stages of the methodology were applied. The economical deterministic analysis was not enough to define the best positioning of the pumping system, in order to obtain the highest financial return, and the probabilistic risk analysis was essential to obtain quantitative data to support an efficient decision. In both cases the suggested positioning of the pumping system was the seabed (skid-ESP or subsea ESP). In the literature, some works propose methodologies to choose the appropriate artificial lift method. Some of them offer an economical evaluation tool; but a methodology that includes the subsea ESP as an option for heavy oil deep water projects was not found in the literature. This paper proposes a methodology that can be easily applied with the software's commonly used in the industry, therefore adding information to the existing body of literature that can benefit practicing engineers.
深水重油采油电潜泵系统最佳定位的技术经济与风险分析方法
在油田开发中,选择合适的人工举升方式对获得项目的最佳经济效益至关重要。从举升能力和流动保障的角度来看,最有效的稠油人工举升方法是ESP,但由于其MTTF(平均无故障时间)较低,在某些情况下,海上修井的相关成本令人望而却步。降低修井成本的另一种方法是将ESP放置在海底的抽油橇中(Subsea ESP / slip -ESP)。然而,将ESP放置在海底会降低初始井流量。最常见的是,人工举升方法的选择是基于作业者的初步经验,而不是进行适当的技术和商业评估。本文提出了一种提供定量数据的方法,以协助决定泵送系统的最佳定位,在井内或在海底,以获得最佳的经济回报。该方法基于三个阶段:技术评估,这是一个消除步骤,基于泵可以处理的GVF(气体体积分数)限制,而不会出现流动问题;然后,对两个项目(ESP和撬式ESP)进行经济和风险分析。研究人员进行了三个案例研究,以评估所提出的方法,并证实它是一个很好的工具,可以帮助决定泵送系统的最佳位置。结果表明,所提出的三个阶段是重要的。在三种情况中,有一种情况是,由于该项目计算的GVF很高,超过了该特定井的限制,因此在方法的第一步就对橇式电潜泵进行了解密。在另外两个案例中,采用了方法的所有三个阶段。经济确定性分析不足以定义抽水系统的最佳定位,以获得最高的财务回报,概率风险分析是必不可少的,以获得定量数据,以支持有效的决策。在这两种情况下,建议将泵送系统定位在海底(橇式电潜泵或海底电潜泵)。在文献中,一些工作提出了选择合适的人工举升方法的方法。其中一些提供了经济的评估工具;但是,将水下电潜泵作为稠油深水项目的一种选择的方法还没有在文献中找到。本文提出了一种方法,可以很容易地应用于行业中常用的软件,从而为现有的文献增加信息,使实践工程师受益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信