Romanticism and Politics: from Heinrich Heine to Carl Schmitt – and Back Again

IF 0.2 4区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY
Pericles S. Vallianos
{"title":"Romanticism and Politics: from Heinrich Heine to Carl Schmitt – and Back Again","authors":"Pericles S. Vallianos","doi":"10.12681/HR.311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After a reference to the debate concerning the concept of Romanticism (Lovejoy vs Wellek), the article briefly evokes certain key stances of English and French literary Romanticism. It then points to the distinguishing features of German Romanticism, namely the enlargement of the doctrine into an integral metaphysics with the concept of the “organic state” at its core (A. Muller). The critique of political Romanticism by two revolutionary democrats (H. Heine and A. Ruge) is then presented. The article closes with a critique of C. Schmitt’s interpretation of political Romanticism.","PeriodicalId":40645,"journal":{"name":"Historical Review-La Revue Historique","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Historical Review-La Revue Historique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12681/HR.311","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

After a reference to the debate concerning the concept of Romanticism (Lovejoy vs Wellek), the article briefly evokes certain key stances of English and French literary Romanticism. It then points to the distinguishing features of German Romanticism, namely the enlargement of the doctrine into an integral metaphysics with the concept of the “organic state” at its core (A. Muller). The critique of political Romanticism by two revolutionary democrats (H. Heine and A. Ruge) is then presented. The article closes with a critique of C. Schmitt’s interpretation of political Romanticism.
浪漫主义与政治:从海因里希·海涅到卡尔·施密特——再回来
在参考了关于浪漫主义概念的争论(洛夫乔伊与韦勒克)之后,文章简要地唤起了英法浪漫主义文学的一些关键立场。然后,它指出了德国浪漫主义的显著特征,即以“有机国家”的概念为核心,将学说扩大为一种整体形而上学(A. Muller)。然后介绍了两位革命民主派(海涅和鲁格)对政治浪漫主义的批判。文章最后对C.施密特对政治浪漫主义的解释进行了批判。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
40 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信