A comparative study on methanol sensing performance of ZnO nanoflower and nanorod based resistive devices

D. Acharyya, N. Banerjee, P. Bhattacharyya
{"title":"A comparative study on methanol sensing performance of ZnO nanoflower and nanorod based resistive devices","authors":"D. Acharyya, N. Banerjee, P. Bhattacharyya","doi":"10.1109/ICSENS.2014.6985123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A comparative study on methanol sensing performance of ZnO nanoflowers and nanorods is reported in this paper. Chemical bath deposition technique was employed to develop both the nanostructures on a sol-gel grown seed layer deposited SiO2 substrate. 0.1(M) ZnCl2 with 0.3(M) NH3 solution (about 25%) used for synthesis of nanoflowers, while 0.1(M) Zn(Ac)2 with 0.1(M) HMT was employed to escalate nanorods. Both the nanoforms, in resistive mode, were found to detect methanol with a high dynamic range of 0.5-700 ppm. Both the nanoforms offered the optimum operating temperature of 300°C with the corresponding response magnitude (RM) of 39%-92% (nanoflowers) and 54%-94.1% (nanorods) towards 0.5 ppm and 700 ppm methanol respectively. The response time of the nanorod based sensor were found to be faster than its nanoflower based counterpart. Improved methanol sensing properties of nanorods sensor (compared to nanoflower) might be attributed to the more ordered structures of nanorods.","PeriodicalId":13244,"journal":{"name":"IEEE SENSORS 2014 Proceedings","volume":"1 1","pages":"811-814"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE SENSORS 2014 Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSENS.2014.6985123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

A comparative study on methanol sensing performance of ZnO nanoflowers and nanorods is reported in this paper. Chemical bath deposition technique was employed to develop both the nanostructures on a sol-gel grown seed layer deposited SiO2 substrate. 0.1(M) ZnCl2 with 0.3(M) NH3 solution (about 25%) used for synthesis of nanoflowers, while 0.1(M) Zn(Ac)2 with 0.1(M) HMT was employed to escalate nanorods. Both the nanoforms, in resistive mode, were found to detect methanol with a high dynamic range of 0.5-700 ppm. Both the nanoforms offered the optimum operating temperature of 300°C with the corresponding response magnitude (RM) of 39%-92% (nanoflowers) and 54%-94.1% (nanorods) towards 0.5 ppm and 700 ppm methanol respectively. The response time of the nanorod based sensor were found to be faster than its nanoflower based counterpart. Improved methanol sensing properties of nanorods sensor (compared to nanoflower) might be attributed to the more ordered structures of nanorods.
ZnO纳米花与纳米棒电阻器件甲醇传感性能的比较研究
对氧化锌纳米花和纳米棒的甲醇传感性能进行了比较研究。采用化学浴沉积技术在溶胶-凝胶生长的种子层沉积SiO2衬底上制备了这两种纳米结构。用0.1(M) ZnCl2和0.3(M) NH3溶液(约25%)合成纳米花,用0.1(M) Zn(Ac)2和0.1(M) HMT升级纳米棒。在电阻模式下,这两种纳米形式都可以检测到0.5-700 ppm的高动态范围的甲醇。两种纳米形式对0.5 ppm和700 ppm甲醇的响应量分别为39% ~ 92%(纳米花)和54% ~ 94.1%(纳米棒),其最佳工作温度为300°C。基于纳米棒的传感器的响应时间比基于纳米花的传感器快。与纳米花相比,纳米棒传感器的甲醇传感性能的提高可能是由于纳米棒的结构更加有序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信