Hyojung Kang, Min-Woong Sohn, Soyoun Kim, Siyao Zhang, Rajesh Balkrishnan, Roger Anderson, Anthony McCall, Timothy McMurry, Jennifer Mason Lobo
{"title":"Diabetes Belt has lower efficiency in providing diabetes preventive care than surrounding counties.","authors":"Hyojung Kang, Min-Woong Sohn, Soyoun Kim, Siyao Zhang, Rajesh Balkrishnan, Roger Anderson, Anthony McCall, Timothy McMurry, Jennifer Mason Lobo","doi":"10.1007/s10742-023-00310-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Annual preventive care is essential for diabetes patients to reduce the risk of complications including hypoglycemic events and blindness. Our aim was to examine the relative efficiency of Diabetes Belt (DB) and non-Diabetes Belt (NDB) counties in providing recommended preventive care for Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes using available health professional resources and to understand county-level socioeconomic factors associated with inefficient provision of preventive care. A data envelopment analysis (DEA) model was developed to assess relative efficiency of counties in providing diabetes preventive care. Logistic regression was performed to identify socioeconomic characteristics associated with inefficiencies. We used Medicare claims data to extract individual-level information of diabetes preventive service use and obtained county-level estimates of health resources information from the Area Health Resources File. More than 80% of counties had more than 10% inefficiencies on average. Compared to counties in the NDB, the odds of being inefficient were 2.44 times more likely in the DB (OR 2.44, CI 1.67-3.58). Counties with lower median income, with a smaller proportion of non-Hispanic Black population, and in a rural area had higher odds of being inefficient in providing preventive care. Our DEA results showed that counties in the DB and NDB were mostly inefficient. The availability of care providers may be less of a problem than how efficiently the resources are used in providing preventive care. Identifying sources of inefficiency within each community with low resource utilization and developing targeted strategies is needed to improve uptake of preventive care cost-effectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":45600,"journal":{"name":"Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology","volume":"191 1","pages":"200-210"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12392157/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-023-00310-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/8/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Annual preventive care is essential for diabetes patients to reduce the risk of complications including hypoglycemic events and blindness. Our aim was to examine the relative efficiency of Diabetes Belt (DB) and non-Diabetes Belt (NDB) counties in providing recommended preventive care for Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes using available health professional resources and to understand county-level socioeconomic factors associated with inefficient provision of preventive care. A data envelopment analysis (DEA) model was developed to assess relative efficiency of counties in providing diabetes preventive care. Logistic regression was performed to identify socioeconomic characteristics associated with inefficiencies. We used Medicare claims data to extract individual-level information of diabetes preventive service use and obtained county-level estimates of health resources information from the Area Health Resources File. More than 80% of counties had more than 10% inefficiencies on average. Compared to counties in the NDB, the odds of being inefficient were 2.44 times more likely in the DB (OR 2.44, CI 1.67-3.58). Counties with lower median income, with a smaller proportion of non-Hispanic Black population, and in a rural area had higher odds of being inefficient in providing preventive care. Our DEA results showed that counties in the DB and NDB were mostly inefficient. The availability of care providers may be less of a problem than how efficiently the resources are used in providing preventive care. Identifying sources of inefficiency within each community with low resource utilization and developing targeted strategies is needed to improve uptake of preventive care cost-effectively.
对于糖尿病患者来说,每年的预防性保健对于降低低血糖事件和失明等并发症的风险至关重要。我们的目的是检查糖尿病带(DB)和非糖尿病带(NDB)县在利用现有卫生专业资源为糖尿病医疗保险受益人提供推荐的预防保健方面的相对效率,并了解与预防保健提供效率低下相关的县级社会经济因素。采用数据包络分析(DEA)模型评估各县提供糖尿病预防护理的相对效率。进行逻辑回归以确定与效率低下相关的社会经济特征。我们使用医疗保险索赔数据提取糖尿病预防服务使用的个人水平信息,并从区域卫生资源文件中获得县级卫生资源信息估计。超过80%的县的平均低效率超过10%。与新开发银行的国家相比,低效率的可能性是新开发银行的2.44倍(OR 2.44, CI 1.67-3.58)。收入中位数较低、非西班牙裔黑人人口比例较小以及农村地区的县在提供预防保健方面效率较低的可能性更高。我们的DEA结果显示,在DB和NDB的县大多效率低下。保健提供者的可用性可能不是一个问题,而是如何有效地利用资源来提供预防性保健。需要在每个资源利用率低的社区内确定效率低下的根源,并制定有针对性的战略,以经济有效地提高预防保健的接受程度。
期刊介绍:
The journal reflects the multidisciplinary nature of the field of health services and outcomes research. It addresses the needs of multiple, interlocking communities, including methodologists in statistics, econometrics, social and behavioral sciences; designers and analysts of health policy and health services research projects; and health care providers and policy makers who need to properly understand and evaluate the results of published research. The journal strives to enhance the level of methodologic rigor in health services and outcomes research and contributes to the development of methodologic standards in the field. In pursuing its main objective, the journal also provides a meeting ground for researchers from a number of traditional disciplines and fosters the development of new quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods by statisticians, econometricians, health services researchers, and methodologists in other fields. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology publishes: Research papers on quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods; Case Studies describing applications of quantitative and qualitative methodology in health services and outcomes research; Review Articles synthesizing and popularizing methodologic developments; Tutorials; Articles on computational issues and software reviews; Book reviews; and Notices. Special issues will be devoted to papers presented at important workshops and conferences.