Domain-general cognitive motivation: Evidence from economic decision-making - Final Registered Report.

IF 0.1 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Jennifer L Crawford, Sarah A Eisenstein, Jonathan E Peelle, Todd S Braver
{"title":"Domain-general cognitive motivation: Evidence from economic decision-making - Final Registered Report.","authors":"Jennifer L Crawford, Sarah A Eisenstein, Jonathan E Peelle, Todd S Braver","doi":"10.1186/s41235-022-00363-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stable individual differences in cognitive motivation (i.e., the tendency to engage in and enjoy effortful cognitive activities) have been documented with self-report measures, yet convergent support for a trait-level construct is still lacking. In the present study, we used an innovative decision-making paradigm (COG-ED) to quantify the costs of cognitive effort, a metric of cognitive motivation, across two distinct cognitive domains: working memory (an N-back task) and speech comprehension (understanding spoken sentences in background noise). We hypothesized that cognitive motivation operates similarly within individuals, regardless of domain. Specifically, in 104 adults aged 18-40 years, we tested whether individual differences in effort costs are stable across domains, even after controlling for other potential sources of shared individual variation. Conversely, we evaluated whether the costs of cognitive effort across domains may be better explained in terms of other relevant cognitive and personality-related constructs, such as working memory capacity or reward sensitivity. We confirmed a reliable association among effort costs in both domains, even when these other sources of individual variation, as well as task load, are statistically controlled. Taken together, these results add support for trait-level variation in cognitive motivation impacting effort-based decision making across multiple domains.</p>","PeriodicalId":21826,"journal":{"name":"Spektrum der Augenheilkunde","volume":"11 1","pages":"23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8931160/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spektrum der Augenheilkunde","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-022-00363-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stable individual differences in cognitive motivation (i.e., the tendency to engage in and enjoy effortful cognitive activities) have been documented with self-report measures, yet convergent support for a trait-level construct is still lacking. In the present study, we used an innovative decision-making paradigm (COG-ED) to quantify the costs of cognitive effort, a metric of cognitive motivation, across two distinct cognitive domains: working memory (an N-back task) and speech comprehension (understanding spoken sentences in background noise). We hypothesized that cognitive motivation operates similarly within individuals, regardless of domain. Specifically, in 104 adults aged 18-40 years, we tested whether individual differences in effort costs are stable across domains, even after controlling for other potential sources of shared individual variation. Conversely, we evaluated whether the costs of cognitive effort across domains may be better explained in terms of other relevant cognitive and personality-related constructs, such as working memory capacity or reward sensitivity. We confirmed a reliable association among effort costs in both domains, even when these other sources of individual variation, as well as task load, are statistically controlled. Taken together, these results add support for trait-level variation in cognitive motivation impacting effort-based decision making across multiple domains.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

领域一般认知动机:来自经济决策的证据--最终注册报告。
认知动机(即参与和享受费力认知活动的倾向)的稳定个体差异已被自我报告测量法记录在案,但特质层面的建构仍缺乏收敛性支持。在本研究中,我们使用了一种创新的决策范式(COG-ED)来量化认知努力的成本,这是认知动机的一个指标,它横跨两个不同的认知领域:工作记忆(N-back 任务)和言语理解(在背景噪音中理解口语句子)。我们假设,无论在哪个领域,认知动机在个体内部的作用都是相似的。具体来说,我们以 104 名 18-40 岁的成年人为研究对象,测试了努力成本的个体差异在不同领域是否稳定,即使在控制了其他潜在的共同个体差异来源之后也是如此。反过来,我们还评估了不同领域的认知努力成本是否可以通过其他相关的认知和个性相关建构(如工作记忆能力或奖赏敏感性)得到更好的解释。我们证实了这两个领域的努力成本之间存在可靠的关联,即使在统计上控制了这些其他个体差异来源以及任务负荷的情况下也是如此。综上所述,这些结果进一步支持了认知动机的特质水平差异会影响多个领域基于努力的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spektrum der Augenheilkunde
Spektrum der Augenheilkunde 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: "Spektrum der Augenheilkunde" is an educational journal for ophthalmologists. It is published six times per year and presents reviews, original papers, editorials, case studies and analyses surrounding technical innovations in ophthalmology. Letters to the editor, guest commentaries, book reviews, literature overviews, product information and a congress calendar complete the range of its contents. Thus, "Spektrum der Augenheilkunde" keeps ophthalmologists up-to-date on current developments, both practice-relevant and research-related. The editorial board and its editorial advisors guarantee the high quality of publications and a broad, well-balanced choice of published topics. Topics of interest: Complete range of ophthalmology; Ethical standards; Declaration of Helsinki, Informed consent, Animal rights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书