Spatial patterns of urban green space and its actual utilization status in China based on big data analysis

IF 4.2 3区 地球科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Yiyi Huang, Tao Lin, Guoqin Zhang, Yongguan Zhu, Zhiwei Zeng, Hong Ye
{"title":"Spatial patterns of urban green space and its actual utilization status in China based on big data analysis","authors":"Yiyi Huang, Tao Lin, Guoqin Zhang, Yongguan Zhu, Zhiwei Zeng, Hong Ye","doi":"10.1080/20964471.2021.1939990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Urban green space (UGS) is essential for sustainable urbanization and human well-being. The utilization status of UGS is closely related to the provision of ecosystem services for urban residents. Limitations on data availability, however, have led to the absence of a comprehensive approach for evaluating the actual utilization status of UGS at a large scale. Furthermore, differences in actual UGS utilization between intra-urban and peri-urban areas have not received enough attention. This study used big data analysis by combining point of interest (POI) and land use and cover change (LUCC) to quantify the spatial patterns of UGS utilization, and to evaluate the actual utilization status of UGS in 366 cities on the Chinese mainland. We also explored the differences in the actual utilization of UGS in intra-urban and peri-urban areas. The results showed that 94.01% of UGS resources in China had not been utilized. There was a clear pattern of spatial mismatch between the stock and the actual utilization of UGS, especially in the northwestern region indicated by the Hu Huanyong Line. The actual utilization rate of UGS was closely related to the regional development level. There was a certain mismatch between the actual utilization and stock of intraurban green space (IUGS). The hot spots of the actual utilization rate of IUGS were in Yunnan, Guizhou, and Sichuan Provinces in southwestern China. The differences in UGS actual utilization rates between IUGS and peri-urban green space (PUGS) were small in eastern China, but large in southwestern and northwestern China. The actual utilization rate of IUGS in most Chinese cities was significantly larger than that of PUGS, indicating that PUGS were not well utilized. Our results provide scientific support for urban and regional planners in targeting specific areas for UGS design and development, and in optimizing future UGS planning in China.","PeriodicalId":8765,"journal":{"name":"Big Earth Data","volume":"100 1","pages":"391 - 409"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Big Earth Data","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20964471.2021.1939990","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

ABSTRACT Urban green space (UGS) is essential for sustainable urbanization and human well-being. The utilization status of UGS is closely related to the provision of ecosystem services for urban residents. Limitations on data availability, however, have led to the absence of a comprehensive approach for evaluating the actual utilization status of UGS at a large scale. Furthermore, differences in actual UGS utilization between intra-urban and peri-urban areas have not received enough attention. This study used big data analysis by combining point of interest (POI) and land use and cover change (LUCC) to quantify the spatial patterns of UGS utilization, and to evaluate the actual utilization status of UGS in 366 cities on the Chinese mainland. We also explored the differences in the actual utilization of UGS in intra-urban and peri-urban areas. The results showed that 94.01% of UGS resources in China had not been utilized. There was a clear pattern of spatial mismatch between the stock and the actual utilization of UGS, especially in the northwestern region indicated by the Hu Huanyong Line. The actual utilization rate of UGS was closely related to the regional development level. There was a certain mismatch between the actual utilization and stock of intraurban green space (IUGS). The hot spots of the actual utilization rate of IUGS were in Yunnan, Guizhou, and Sichuan Provinces in southwestern China. The differences in UGS actual utilization rates between IUGS and peri-urban green space (PUGS) were small in eastern China, but large in southwestern and northwestern China. The actual utilization rate of IUGS in most Chinese cities was significantly larger than that of PUGS, indicating that PUGS were not well utilized. Our results provide scientific support for urban and regional planners in targeting specific areas for UGS design and development, and in optimizing future UGS planning in China.
基于大数据分析的中国城市绿地空间格局及实际利用现状
城市绿地(UGS)对于可持续城市化和人类福祉至关重要。地表地质系统的利用状况与为城市居民提供生态系统服务密切相关。然而,由于数据可得性的限制,导致缺乏一种全面的方法来大规模评价地质勘探局的实际利用状况。此外,城市内部和城市周边地区之间的实际UGS利用差异没有得到足够的重视。本研究采用大数据分析方法,结合兴趣点(POI)和土地利用与覆被变化(LUCC),量化了中国大陆366个城市UGS利用的空间格局,并对UGS的实际利用状况进行了评价。我们还探讨了城市内部和城市周边地区UGS实际利用的差异。结果表明,全国94.01%的UGS资源未得到有效利用。在以胡焕庸线为标志的西北地区,UGS储量与实际利用之间存在明显的空间失配格局。UGS的实际利用率与区域发展水平密切相关。城市绿地的实际利用率与存量之间存在一定的不匹配。中国西南地区的云南、贵州和四川是IUGS实际利用率的热点地区。城市绿地与城市周边绿地的实际利用率差异在东部地区较小,而在西南和西北地区较大。中国大部分城市IUGS的实际利用率明显大于PUGS,说明PUGS的利用程度不高。研究结果可为城市和区域规划者在特定区域设计和开发UGS,以及优化未来中国UGS规划提供科学支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Big Earth Data
Big Earth Data Earth and Planetary Sciences-Computers in Earth Sciences
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信