The efficacy of serial physical examination in management of penetrating abdominal trauma to avoid negative laparotomy in selected cases

Md Aminul Lslam, M. Bhuiyan, Razibul Haque, Kazi Majharul Islam, M. Masum, Md. Azizur Rahman
{"title":"The efficacy of serial physical examination in management of penetrating abdominal trauma to avoid negative laparotomy in selected cases","authors":"Md Aminul Lslam, M. Bhuiyan, Razibul Haque, Kazi Majharul Islam, M. Masum, Md. Azizur Rahman","doi":"10.3329/jss.v21i2.43901","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Patients with Penetrating Abdominal Injury (PAI) are at risk of harboring life-threatening injuries. Many patients are in need of emergency operative intervention. However, there are some patients who can be safely managed non-operatively. Every patient with an abdominal penetrating trauma should have a thorough clinical examination. Repeating the clinical examination at regular intervals is the cornerstone of selective management, as symptoms and signs that were initially absent may appear later. \nObjective: To see the efficacy of serial physical examination in patients with penetrating abdominal injury thus avoiding non-therapeutic laparotomy in the overall management of patients. \nMethods: Convenient and purposive 60 PAI patients admitted in casualty block of Dhaka Medical College & Hospital were selected for selective non operative management (SNOM). On admission the abdominal wound was inspected and neither digital nor direct probing of the wound was attempted. Patients selected for admission had an intravenous line established, a thoracic and abdominal X-ray taken and urine and blood samples were taken. If necessary, a nasogastric tube was inserted. Asymptomatic haemodynamically stable patients were admitted for clinical observation in a single unit during which period the patient was examined by a senior surgeon for clinical re-assessment. Patients were discharged when feeding was normal and if there were clear signs of improvement. Results: Over a 6 month period 60 consecutive patients with penetrating abdominal wound were reviewed. In total 52 patients (86.67%) were managed with clinical re-assessment and discharged without laparotomy. Eight patients (13.33%) underwent laparotomy after observation. Small bowel, liver, mesenteric vessels were most frequently affected. Non-therapeutic laparotomy rate was 0%. After laparotomy the morbidity rates were 62.5% (p = 0.92). One local wound infection occurred without prior laparotomy. Average hospital stay after observation was 2.8 days, after laparotomy 9.8 days. Delayed laparotomy did not increase morbidity or hospitalization. \nConclusion: Our experience with penetrating abdominal trauma supports the concept of selective conservatism based on repeated physical examination. In a well-established trauma center this has proven to be highly effective with remarkably low rates of non-therapeutic laparotomies and absence of missed diagnosis of visceral injuries. \nJournal of Surgical Sciences (2017) Vol. 21 (2): 76-79","PeriodicalId":33248,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Sciences","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jss.v21i2.43901","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with Penetrating Abdominal Injury (PAI) are at risk of harboring life-threatening injuries. Many patients are in need of emergency operative intervention. However, there are some patients who can be safely managed non-operatively. Every patient with an abdominal penetrating trauma should have a thorough clinical examination. Repeating the clinical examination at regular intervals is the cornerstone of selective management, as symptoms and signs that were initially absent may appear later. Objective: To see the efficacy of serial physical examination in patients with penetrating abdominal injury thus avoiding non-therapeutic laparotomy in the overall management of patients. Methods: Convenient and purposive 60 PAI patients admitted in casualty block of Dhaka Medical College & Hospital were selected for selective non operative management (SNOM). On admission the abdominal wound was inspected and neither digital nor direct probing of the wound was attempted. Patients selected for admission had an intravenous line established, a thoracic and abdominal X-ray taken and urine and blood samples were taken. If necessary, a nasogastric tube was inserted. Asymptomatic haemodynamically stable patients were admitted for clinical observation in a single unit during which period the patient was examined by a senior surgeon for clinical re-assessment. Patients were discharged when feeding was normal and if there were clear signs of improvement. Results: Over a 6 month period 60 consecutive patients with penetrating abdominal wound were reviewed. In total 52 patients (86.67%) were managed with clinical re-assessment and discharged without laparotomy. Eight patients (13.33%) underwent laparotomy after observation. Small bowel, liver, mesenteric vessels were most frequently affected. Non-therapeutic laparotomy rate was 0%. After laparotomy the morbidity rates were 62.5% (p = 0.92). One local wound infection occurred without prior laparotomy. Average hospital stay after observation was 2.8 days, after laparotomy 9.8 days. Delayed laparotomy did not increase morbidity or hospitalization. Conclusion: Our experience with penetrating abdominal trauma supports the concept of selective conservatism based on repeated physical examination. In a well-established trauma center this has proven to be highly effective with remarkably low rates of non-therapeutic laparotomies and absence of missed diagnosis of visceral injuries. Journal of Surgical Sciences (2017) Vol. 21 (2): 76-79
连续体格检查在治疗穿透性腹部创伤中避免阴性剖腹手术的效果
背景:穿透性腹部损伤(PAI)患者存在危及生命的损伤风险。许多患者需要紧急手术干预。然而,也有一些患者可以安全地进行非手术治疗。每一个腹部穿透性创伤的病人都应该进行彻底的临床检查。定期重复临床检查是选择性治疗的基础,因为最初没有的症状和体征可能会在以后出现。目的:探讨连续体格检查对穿透性腹部损伤患者的治疗效果,避免非治疗性剖腹手术。方法:选择方便、有针对性的达卡医学院附属医院急诊区收治的60例PAI患者进行选择性非手术治疗。入院时检查了腹部伤口,没有尝试用手指或直接探查伤口。选择入院的患者建立静脉注射线,拍摄胸部和腹部x光片,并采集尿液和血液样本。必要时,插入鼻胃管。无症状血流动力学稳定的患者在一个单独的单元接受临床观察,在此期间由一名高级外科医生对患者进行检查以进行临床重新评估。当进食正常且有明显改善迹象时,患者出院。结果:在6个月的时间里,我们回顾了60例连续的腹部穿透伤患者。52例患者(86.67%)经临床再评估出院,未开腹手术。观察后行开腹手术8例(13.33%)。小肠、肝脏、肠系膜血管最常受影响。非治疗性剖腹手术率为0%。剖腹手术后发病率为62.5% (p = 0.92)。1例局部伤口感染未开腹手术。观察后平均住院时间2.8天,开腹后平均住院时间9.8天。延迟剖腹手术不会增加发病率或住院率。结论:我们对穿透性腹部创伤的经验支持基于反复体检的选择性保守的概念。在一个完善的创伤中心,这种方法被证明是非常有效的,非治疗性剖腹手术的发生率非常低,并且没有内脏损伤的漏诊。外科杂志(2017)Vol. 21 (2): 76-79
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信