Online group psychotherapy: Challenges and possibilities during COVID-19—A practice review.

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
H. Weinberg
{"title":"Online group psychotherapy: Challenges and possibilities during COVID-19—A practice review.","authors":"H. Weinberg","doi":"10.1037/gdn0000140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Online group therapy is a relatively new modality for leading groups There is not enough research yet to evaluate its effectiveness and no clear guidelines about how to do it well With the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic it became even more crucial to provide clinicians with appropriate research review and practical guidelines The purpose of this article was to provide practice recommendations based on or despite the limited research Method: The article reviewed research on online therapy in general, including any on groups, followed by a summary of the obstacles in leading groups online and recommendations for creative solutions Findings: Research on online groups is still scarce, and its quality still has many limitations Discussion: More research is needed, especially on specific elements in online group therapy, such as the establishing of cohesion and therapeutic presence online, as well as how different the working alliance and cohesion are created online when compared to face-to-face groups Despite limited research, the author recommends being more active and increasing self-disclosure in online groups to compensate for the challenge of being present and the lack of body-to-body interaction Training for online group therapy is necessary (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved) Impact Statement Highlights and Implications-*Two of the ingredients of the therapeutic alliance, agreeing on the goals and tasks, can easily be achieved in online groups The third one, the quality of relationship, is still questionable *The absence of body-to-body interaction in online groups may be considered the main obstacle in shifting from the circle to the screen The absence of eye contact is especially relevant for group therapists *Presence is difficult to achieve through screen relations There are too many distractions Increasing the group therapist's self-disclosure and encouraging group members to use their imagination may be of help *Moving from in-person to online group therapy requires knowledge and training, just as when moving from individual therapy to group therapy (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved)","PeriodicalId":51499,"journal":{"name":"Group Dynamics-Theory Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"120","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Group Dynamics-Theory Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000140","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 120

Abstract

Background: Online group therapy is a relatively new modality for leading groups There is not enough research yet to evaluate its effectiveness and no clear guidelines about how to do it well With the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic it became even more crucial to provide clinicians with appropriate research review and practical guidelines The purpose of this article was to provide practice recommendations based on or despite the limited research Method: The article reviewed research on online therapy in general, including any on groups, followed by a summary of the obstacles in leading groups online and recommendations for creative solutions Findings: Research on online groups is still scarce, and its quality still has many limitations Discussion: More research is needed, especially on specific elements in online group therapy, such as the establishing of cohesion and therapeutic presence online, as well as how different the working alliance and cohesion are created online when compared to face-to-face groups Despite limited research, the author recommends being more active and increasing self-disclosure in online groups to compensate for the challenge of being present and the lack of body-to-body interaction Training for online group therapy is necessary (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved) Impact Statement Highlights and Implications-*Two of the ingredients of the therapeutic alliance, agreeing on the goals and tasks, can easily be achieved in online groups The third one, the quality of relationship, is still questionable *The absence of body-to-body interaction in online groups may be considered the main obstacle in shifting from the circle to the screen The absence of eye contact is especially relevant for group therapists *Presence is difficult to achieve through screen relations There are too many distractions Increasing the group therapist's self-disclosure and encouraging group members to use their imagination may be of help *Moving from in-person to online group therapy requires knowledge and training, just as when moving from individual therapy to group therapy (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved)
网络团体心理治疗:新冠肺炎实践回顾中的挑战与可能性
背景:网络小组治疗是一种相对较新的领导小组治疗方式,目前还没有足够的研究来评估其有效性,也没有明确的指南来指导如何做好网络小组治疗。随着COVID-19大流行的爆发,为临床医生提供适当的研究综述和实用指南变得更加重要。本文的目的是基于或尽管有限的研究方法提供实践建议:本文综述了网络治疗的总体研究,包括任何在线治疗小组,然后总结了在线领导小组的障碍和创造性解决方案的建议。发现:在线小组的研究仍然很少,其质量仍然存在许多局限性。需要更多的研究,特别是关于在线团体治疗的具体要素,例如建立凝聚力和在线治疗存在,以及与面对面的团体相比,在线创建的工作联盟和凝聚力有何不同。作者建议在在线团体中更加积极和增加自我披露,以弥补存在的挑战和缺乏身体对身体互动的培训是必要的(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2020 APA,所有权利保留)影响声明重点和含义-*治疗联盟的两个组成部分,就目标和任务达成一致,可以很容易地在在线团体中实现。关系的质量,*在网络团体中缺乏身体对身体的互动可能被认为是从圆圈转向屏幕的主要障碍缺乏眼神交流对团体治疗师尤其重要*通过屏幕关系很难实现存在有太多的干扰增加团体治疗师的自我表露和鼓励小组成员使用他们的想象力可能会有所帮助*从面对面到在线团体治疗需要什么(心理信息数据库记录(c) 2020 APA,版权所有)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
9.70%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice publishes original empirical articles, theoretical analyses, literature reviews, and brief reports dealing with basic and applied topics in the field of group research and application. The editors construe the phrase group dynamics in the broadest sense—the scientific study of all aspects of groups—and publish work by investigators in such fields as psychology, psychiatry, sociology, education, communication, and business. The journal publishes articles examining groups in a range of contexts, including ad hoc groups in experimental settings, therapy groups, naturally forming friendship groups and cliques, organizational units, self-help groups, and learning groups.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信