VERIFICATION OF ELASTOMERIC BEARINGS FINITE-ELEMENT MODELS IN CALCULATING SOFTWARE PACKAGES

O. Mkrtychev, A. Bunov
{"title":"VERIFICATION OF ELASTOMERIC BEARINGS FINITE-ELEMENT MODELS IN CALCULATING SOFTWARE PACKAGES","authors":"O. Mkrtychev, A. Bunov","doi":"10.22227/10.22227/2305-5502.2018.4.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. While designing buildings and constructions with an elastomeric bearing with a lead core as a seismic isolation system, it is necessary to make calculations concerning effectiveness and reasonability of its usage. These demands lead to necessity to construct bearings in a common finite-element model, in order to consider how a bearing and a construction work together. Though a calculator has a lot of different variants of elastomeric bearing’s construction, which are connected to their implemented work model. To prove that obtained calculation results are sufficient and accurate, selection criteria of elastomeric bearings implemented work models are necessary. Materials and methods. To get accurate results we will compare elastomeric bearing’s work diagrams and free periods of motion when there are different variants of their numerical modelling with the help of software packages with factory tests results. Results. The researches have shown that lateral force’s and shear’s limit values are the same for all of the observed cases, although free periods of motion and work diagrams differ. Usage of more accurate bearing work model in software package Ansys/LS-Dyna can explain these differences, it can be seen if compare their work’s diagrams. Conclusions. Analysis of constructions with elastomeric bearings’ work, which function according to the idealized linear model, can be possible only for II level constructions. Idealized nonlinear models should be used for I level constructions.","PeriodicalId":22024,"journal":{"name":"Stroitel stvo nauka i obrazovanie [Construction Science and Education]","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stroitel stvo nauka i obrazovanie [Construction Science and Education]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22227/10.22227/2305-5502.2018.4.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. While designing buildings and constructions with an elastomeric bearing with a lead core as a seismic isolation system, it is necessary to make calculations concerning effectiveness and reasonability of its usage. These demands lead to necessity to construct bearings in a common finite-element model, in order to consider how a bearing and a construction work together. Though a calculator has a lot of different variants of elastomeric bearing’s construction, which are connected to their implemented work model. To prove that obtained calculation results are sufficient and accurate, selection criteria of elastomeric bearings implemented work models are necessary. Materials and methods. To get accurate results we will compare elastomeric bearing’s work diagrams and free periods of motion when there are different variants of their numerical modelling with the help of software packages with factory tests results. Results. The researches have shown that lateral force’s and shear’s limit values are the same for all of the observed cases, although free periods of motion and work diagrams differ. Usage of more accurate bearing work model in software package Ansys/LS-Dyna can explain these differences, it can be seen if compare their work’s diagrams. Conclusions. Analysis of constructions with elastomeric bearings’ work, which function according to the idealized linear model, can be possible only for II level constructions. Idealized nonlinear models should be used for I level constructions.
弹性轴承有限元模型在计算软件包中的验证
介绍。在设计采用铅芯弹性支座作为隔震系统的建筑物和构造物时,有必要对其使用的有效性和合理性进行计算。这些要求导致有必要在共同的有限元模型中构建轴承,以便考虑轴承和结构如何协同工作。虽然一个计算器有很多不同的弹性轴承的结构,这是连接到他们实现的工作模型。为了证明所得到的计算结果是充分和准确的,有必要对弹性轴承实施工作模型的选择准则。材料和方法。为了得到准确的结果,我们将在软件包和出厂测试结果的帮助下,比较弹性轴承在有不同数值建模变体时的工作图和自由运动周期。结果。研究表明,尽管自由运动周期和工作图不同,但所有观察到的情况下,侧向力和剪切极限值是相同的。在Ansys/LS-Dyna软件包中使用更精确的轴承工作模型可以解释这些差异,如果比较它们的工作图就可以看出。结论。基于理想线性模型的弹性轴承结构的功分析只能适用于二级结构。理想的非线性模型应用于一级结构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信