Non-Nuclear and Rare Nuclear ANA Patterns in Indirect Immunoflourescence Testing and their Clinical Associations

G. Ravikumar
{"title":"Non-Nuclear and Rare Nuclear ANA Patterns in Indirect Immunoflourescence Testing and their Clinical Associations","authors":"G. Ravikumar","doi":"10.14744/ejmo.2023.42261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". Objectives: A standardized nomenclature to report Antinuclear antibody(ANA) is given by the International consensus on ANA pattern (ICAP). The cytoplasmic, mitotic and rare nuclear patterns are infrequently reported.The study was done to understand the clinical significance and frequency of these unconventional patterns in our population. Methods: Retrospective one year blinded study of ANA patterns in serum samples. Results: Of the 4730 samples, 4568 were included after deleting 162 repeat samples. ANA positivity was seen in 673 cases (14.7%). Cytoplasmic patterns were found in 184 cases (27.3%) and mitotic pattern in 16 (2.4%) cases. Exclusive cytoplasmic patterns were seen in 100 cases (14.3%) and exclusive mitotic pattern in 14 cases (2.08%). Rare nuclear patterns were seen in 30 cases (4.5%).The most common exclusive cytoplasmic pattern was filamentous(n=39), whereas the common cytoplasmic pattern associated with nuclear pattern (mixed pattern) was cytoplasmic homogeneous (AC-19). The rare nuclear patterns included Topo-I (n=9), nuclear envelope (n=5), multiple (n=6) and few (n=8) nuclear dots. While some of the common cytoplasmic patterns like filamentous and homogeneous were more frequent in AIDs the uncommon patterns showed varied clinical associations. Conclusion: The study demonstrates the clinical significance of reporting exclusive and mixed non nuclear ANA patterns on IIF as many of these have known autoimmune associations.","PeriodicalId":11831,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Journal of Medicine and Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Journal of Medicine and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/ejmo.2023.42261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

. Objectives: A standardized nomenclature to report Antinuclear antibody(ANA) is given by the International consensus on ANA pattern (ICAP). The cytoplasmic, mitotic and rare nuclear patterns are infrequently reported.The study was done to understand the clinical significance and frequency of these unconventional patterns in our population. Methods: Retrospective one year blinded study of ANA patterns in serum samples. Results: Of the 4730 samples, 4568 were included after deleting 162 repeat samples. ANA positivity was seen in 673 cases (14.7%). Cytoplasmic patterns were found in 184 cases (27.3%) and mitotic pattern in 16 (2.4%) cases. Exclusive cytoplasmic patterns were seen in 100 cases (14.3%) and exclusive mitotic pattern in 14 cases (2.08%). Rare nuclear patterns were seen in 30 cases (4.5%).The most common exclusive cytoplasmic pattern was filamentous(n=39), whereas the common cytoplasmic pattern associated with nuclear pattern (mixed pattern) was cytoplasmic homogeneous (AC-19). The rare nuclear patterns included Topo-I (n=9), nuclear envelope (n=5), multiple (n=6) and few (n=8) nuclear dots. While some of the common cytoplasmic patterns like filamentous and homogeneous were more frequent in AIDs the uncommon patterns showed varied clinical associations. Conclusion: The study demonstrates the clinical significance of reporting exclusive and mixed non nuclear ANA patterns on IIF as many of these have known autoimmune associations.
间接免疫荧光检测中的非核和罕见核ANA模式及其临床关联
. 目的:抗核抗体(ANA)报告的标准化命名是由国际共识的ANA模式(ICAP)给出的。细胞质、有丝分裂和罕见的核模式很少被报道。这项研究是为了了解这些非常规模式在我们人群中的临床意义和频率。方法:对血清样本进行为期一年的回顾性盲法研究。结果:4730个样本中,剔除162个重复样本后,纳入4568个样本。ANA阳性673例(14.7%)。细胞质模式184例(27.3%),有丝分裂模式16例(2.4%)。排他性细胞质模式100例(14.3%),排他性有丝分裂模式14例(2.08%)。罕见核型30例(4.5%)。最常见的细胞质模式是丝状(n=39),而与核模式相关的常见细胞质模式(混合模式)是细胞质均匀(AC-19)。罕见的核点形态包括Topo-I型(n=9)、核包膜型(n=5)、多核点型(n=6)和少核点型(n=8)。一些常见的细胞质模式如丝状和均匀型在艾滋病中更为常见,而不常见的细胞质模式则表现出不同的临床相关性。结论:该研究证明了报告IIF的独家和混合非核ANA模式的临床意义,因为其中许多都具有已知的自身免疫关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信