eCST: The endoscopic-assisted component separation technique for (complex) abdominal wall reconstruction

IF 0.5 Q4 SURGERY
T. S. de Vries Reilingh, S. Nienhuijs, D. D. de Jong, E. Mommers, J. Wegdam
{"title":"eCST: The endoscopic-assisted component separation technique for (complex) abdominal wall reconstruction","authors":"T. S. de Vries Reilingh, S. Nienhuijs, D. D. de Jong, E. Mommers, J. Wegdam","doi":"10.4103/ijawhs.ijawhs_41_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: In 1990, Ramirez introduced his component separation technique (CST) based on enlargement of the abdominal wall for reconstruction of large abdominal wall defects. CST is prone to postoperative wound complications which lead to modification of the technique to an endoscopic assisted CST. The details of the technique are described in detail with illustrations and report the results of a 36 patient cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2014 and 2018, patients with midline hernias without previous subcutaneous dissection underwent endoscopic-assisted anterior components separation technique (eCST) with retro-rectus mesh enforcement in an expert center for abdominal wall reconstructions. Prospective data were gathered during inpatient care and at least 2 years of follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 36 eCST procedures were performed. Eight patients (22%) had postoperative seroma in the dissection plan between external and internal rectus muscle, 3 (8%) had a hematoma, 1 (3%) had wound dehiscence. Clinical relevant SSEs were present in 4 patients (11%) and consisted of 3 (8%) puncture in seroma, 1 (3%) patient needed a blood transfusion due to large hematoma. One patient was re-operated within 90 days; however, this was the placement of a surgical tracheostomy. Three patients had a recurrence in a mean follow-up length of 24 months. CONCLUSION: eCST can be useful in selected patients.","PeriodicalId":34200,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery","volume":"28 1","pages":"13 - 20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijawhs.ijawhs_41_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In 1990, Ramirez introduced his component separation technique (CST) based on enlargement of the abdominal wall for reconstruction of large abdominal wall defects. CST is prone to postoperative wound complications which lead to modification of the technique to an endoscopic assisted CST. The details of the technique are described in detail with illustrations and report the results of a 36 patient cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 2014 and 2018, patients with midline hernias without previous subcutaneous dissection underwent endoscopic-assisted anterior components separation technique (eCST) with retro-rectus mesh enforcement in an expert center for abdominal wall reconstructions. Prospective data were gathered during inpatient care and at least 2 years of follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 36 eCST procedures were performed. Eight patients (22%) had postoperative seroma in the dissection plan between external and internal rectus muscle, 3 (8%) had a hematoma, 1 (3%) had wound dehiscence. Clinical relevant SSEs were present in 4 patients (11%) and consisted of 3 (8%) puncture in seroma, 1 (3%) patient needed a blood transfusion due to large hematoma. One patient was re-operated within 90 days; however, this was the placement of a surgical tracheostomy. Three patients had a recurrence in a mean follow-up length of 24 months. CONCLUSION: eCST can be useful in selected patients.
eCST:内窥镜辅助成分分离技术用于(复杂)腹壁重建
简介:1990年,Ramirez提出了基于腹壁扩大的成分分离技术(CST),用于腹壁大面积缺损的重建。CST容易出现术后伤口并发症,这导致了内镜辅助CST技术的改进。该技术的细节用插图详细描述,并报告了36例患者队列的结果。材料和方法:2014年至2018年期间,在腹壁重建专家中心,未经皮下夹层的中线疝患者接受了内窥镜辅助前组件分离技术(eCST)和后直肌补片强制实施。前瞻性数据是在住院治疗和至少2年的随访期间收集的。结果:共行36例eCST手术。8例(22%)患者术后出现外、内直肌间血肿,3例(8%)出现血肿,1例(3%)出现创面裂开。4例(11%)患者出现了与临床相关的sse,其中3例(8%)患者在血肿处穿刺,1例(3%)患者因大血肿需要输血。1例患者在90天内再次手术;然而,这是气管切开术的位置。3例患者在平均随访时间24个月后复发。结论:eCST可用于特定患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信