Impact of Blood Transfusions on Survival of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Plus Radical Surgery.

Giorgio Bogani, Antonino Ditto, Fabio Martinelli, Mauro Signorelli, Valentina Chiappa, Carlos Lopez, Alice Indini, Umberto Leone Roberti Maggiore, Ilaria Sabatucci, Domenica Lorusso, Francesco Raspagliesi
{"title":"Impact of Blood Transfusions on Survival of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Plus Radical Surgery.","authors":"Giorgio Bogani, Antonino Ditto, Fabio Martinelli, Mauro Signorelli, Valentina Chiappa, Carlos Lopez, Alice Indini, Umberto Leone Roberti Maggiore, Ilaria Sabatucci, Domenica Lorusso, Francesco Raspagliesi","doi":"10.1097/IGC.0000000000000902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Transfusions represent one of the main progresses of modern medicine. However, accumulating evidence supports that transfusions correlate with worse survival outcomes in patients affected by solid cancers. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the effects of perioperative blood transfusion in locally advanced cervical cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data of consecutive patients affected by locally advanced cervical cancer scheduled to undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radical surgery were retrospectively searched to test the impact of perioperative transfusions on survival outcomes. Five-year survival outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 275 patients. Overall, 170 (62%) patients had blood transfusion. Via univariate analysis, we observed that transfusion correlated with an increased risk of developing recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 2.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-4.40; P = 0.02). Other factors associated with 5-year disease-free survival were noncomplete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR, 2.99; 95% CI, 0.92-9.63; P = 0.06) and pathological (P = 0.03) response at neoadjuvant chemotherapy as well as parametrial (P = 0.004), vaginal (P < 0.001), and lymph node (P = 0.002) involvements. However, via multivariate analysis, only vaginal (HR, 3.07; 95% CI, 1.20-7.85; P = 0.01) and lymph node involvements (HR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.00-6.06; P = 0.05) correlate with worse disease-free survival. No association with worse outcomes was observed for patients undergoing blood transfusion (HR, 2.71; 95% CI, 0.91-8.03; P = 0.07). Looking at factors influencing overall survival, we observed that lymph node status (P = 0.01) and vaginal involvement (P = 0.06) were independently associated with survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The role of blood transfusions in increasing the risk of developing recurrence in LAAC patients treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radical surgery remains unclear; further prospective studies are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":13983,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer","volume":"3 1","pages":"514-522"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Transfusions represent one of the main progresses of modern medicine. However, accumulating evidence supports that transfusions correlate with worse survival outcomes in patients affected by solid cancers. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the effects of perioperative blood transfusion in locally advanced cervical cancer.

Methods: Data of consecutive patients affected by locally advanced cervical cancer scheduled to undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radical surgery were retrospectively searched to test the impact of perioperative transfusions on survival outcomes. Five-year survival outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox models.

Results: The study included 275 patients. Overall, 170 (62%) patients had blood transfusion. Via univariate analysis, we observed that transfusion correlated with an increased risk of developing recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 2.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09-4.40; P = 0.02). Other factors associated with 5-year disease-free survival were noncomplete clinical response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR, 2.99; 95% CI, 0.92-9.63; P = 0.06) and pathological (P = 0.03) response at neoadjuvant chemotherapy as well as parametrial (P = 0.004), vaginal (P < 0.001), and lymph node (P = 0.002) involvements. However, via multivariate analysis, only vaginal (HR, 3.07; 95% CI, 1.20-7.85; P = 0.01) and lymph node involvements (HR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.00-6.06; P = 0.05) correlate with worse disease-free survival. No association with worse outcomes was observed for patients undergoing blood transfusion (HR, 2.71; 95% CI, 0.91-8.03; P = 0.07). Looking at factors influencing overall survival, we observed that lymph node status (P = 0.01) and vaginal involvement (P = 0.06) were independently associated with survival.

Conclusions: The role of blood transfusions in increasing the risk of developing recurrence in LAAC patients treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radical surgery remains unclear; further prospective studies are warranted.

输血对局部晚期宫颈癌新辅助化疗加根治性手术患者生存的影响。
目的:输血是现代医学的主要进步之一。然而,越来越多的证据支持输血与实体癌患者较差的生存结果相关。在本研究中,我们旨在探讨围手术期输血对局部晚期宫颈癌的影响。方法:回顾性分析连续行新辅助化疗加根治性手术的局部晚期宫颈癌患者的资料,探讨围手术期输血对生存结局的影响。使用Kaplan-Meier和Cox模型评估五年生存结果。结果:纳入275例患者。总体而言,170例(62%)患者接受了输血。通过单变量分析,我们观察到输血与复发风险增加相关(危险比[HR], 2.2;95%置信区间[CI], 1.09-4.40;P = 0.02)。与5年无病生存相关的其他因素包括新辅助化疗后临床不完全缓解(HR, 2.99;95% ci, 0.92-9.63;P = 0.06)和病理(P = 0.03)对新辅助化疗的反应,以及参数化(P = 0.004)、阴道(P < 0.001)和淋巴结(P = 0.002)的影响。然而,通过多变量分析,只有阴道(HR, 3.07;95% ci, 1.20-7.85;P = 0.01)和淋巴结受累(HR, 2.4;95% ci, 1.00-6.06;P = 0.05)与较差的无病生存率相关。接受输血的患者未观察到与较差结果的关联(HR, 2.71;95% ci, 0.91-8.03;P = 0.07)。观察影响总生存率的因素,我们观察到淋巴结状态(P = 0.01)和阴道受累情况(P = 0.06)与生存率独立相关。结论:输血在新辅助化疗加根治性手术治疗LAAC患者中增加复发风险的作用尚不清楚;进一步的前瞻性研究是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书