A Novel Method for Retrograde Ureteral Stent Insertion During Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy Without Radiological Guidance

Li Sit, SimAllen Soon Phang, Mohd ZamNor Azhari Bin, HoHenry Sun Sien
{"title":"A Novel Method for Retrograde Ureteral Stent Insertion During Laparoscopic Ureterolithotomy Without Radiological Guidance","authors":"Li Sit, SimAllen Soon Phang, Mohd ZamNor Azhari Bin, HoHenry Sun Sien","doi":"10.1089/VID.2015.0019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction: With the improvement in endoscopic techniques and shockwave lithotripsy, the role of laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (LU) has changed significantly over the past decade.1 LU remains a viable option for patients with large impacted upper ureteric stone which are less well treated by endoscopic methods. LU has been shown in small series to have the highest stone-free rate when comparing to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) in the management of upper ureteral stone of >1 cm.2 In addition, LU has shorter hospitalization, shorter convalescence, and better analgesic profile compared with open ureterolithotomy.1 Various methods of intraoperative ureteric stent insertion during LU have been described but with varying reports on safety or efficacy.3–6 One of the challenges during LU is the laparoscopic insertion of ureteric stent into a small ureteric incision. This can be time consuming and technically challenging. Slippage of the guidewire or stent occurs commonly and their prolonge...","PeriodicalId":92923,"journal":{"name":"Journal of endourology. Part B, Videourology","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of endourology. Part B, Videourology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/VID.2015.0019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: With the improvement in endoscopic techniques and shockwave lithotripsy, the role of laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (LU) has changed significantly over the past decade.1 LU remains a viable option for patients with large impacted upper ureteric stone which are less well treated by endoscopic methods. LU has been shown in small series to have the highest stone-free rate when comparing to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) in the management of upper ureteral stone of >1 cm.2 In addition, LU has shorter hospitalization, shorter convalescence, and better analgesic profile compared with open ureterolithotomy.1 Various methods of intraoperative ureteric stent insertion during LU have been described but with varying reports on safety or efficacy.3–6 One of the challenges during LU is the laparoscopic insertion of ureteric stent into a small ureteric incision. This can be time consuming and technically challenging. Slippage of the guidewire or stent occurs commonly and their prolonge...
腹腔镜输尿管取石术中无影像学指导逆行输尿管支架置入的新方法
摘要导读:随着内镜技术和冲击波碎石术的进步,腹腔镜输尿管取石术(LU)的作用在过去十年发生了显著变化对于内窥镜治疗效果较差的大阻生输尿管上段结石患者,LU仍然是一个可行的选择。在小系列研究中,与体外冲击波碎石术(SWL)相比,在治疗>1 cm的输尿管上段结石时,LU具有最高的结石清除率此外,与开放输尿管取石术相比,LU住院时间短,恢复期短,镇痛效果好期间的各种方法,术中输尿管的支架插入陆已经描述但不同报告安全性或有效性。3-6腹腔镜输尿管支架置入输尿管小切口是腹腔镜输尿管支架置入的挑战之一。这既耗时又具有技术挑战性。导丝或支架的滑移是常见的现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信