New Modified Plane of Weakness Method Enables Drilling Horizontal Wells Successfully in Ordos Basin, China

Fangchao Tong, M. Tang, Gang Chen, Ningbo Wang, Peng Liu, Gongrui Yan, Wei Lin
{"title":"New Modified Plane of Weakness Method Enables Drilling Horizontal Wells Successfully in Ordos Basin, China","authors":"Fangchao Tong, M. Tang, Gang Chen, Ningbo Wang, Peng Liu, Gongrui Yan, Wei Lin","doi":"10.2523/IPTC-19381-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Drilling horizontal wells in YB gas field in Ordos Basin presents significant challenges due to severe wellbore instabilities problems in drilling through Permian Lower Shihezi and Upper Shanxi formations, where laminated shales overlies with sand and coal seam. In first phase of horizontal wells drilling, most wells encountered severe wellbore instabilities including pack-off, stuck-pipe, over-pull, drilling pipe lost in hole and even side track. Post-well analysis showed that these horizontal wells instabilities mainly occurred in Permian Lower Shihezi and Upper Shanxi formation where most cavings and drilling events (stuck-pipe, over-pull) were observed. In contrast, vertical exploration wells have no such instability issues in same interval. To analyze and understand the mechanism of wellbore instability issue and provide optimal mud weight and better drilling practice to reduce the risk of wellbore instabilities, an anisotropic wellbore stability modeling using Plane-of-Weakness (PoW) failure criterion was carried out in this study. The PoW failure criterion is adopted to compute the onset of rock shear sliding and/or fracture along a weak plane (bedding or fracture) and identify the potential wellbore instability risk in drilling through anisotropic rock formations. The influence of bedding orientation, rock anisotropic elastic and strength properties, and wellbore trajectory on the wellbore stability are all included in the model.\n This paper describes the process and workflow of conducting PoW wellbore stability modeling for YB field wellbore drilling. The proposed drilling parameters (stable mud weight) from the modeling and its application and improvement for next wells drilling, are also included. The analysis showed that the laminated shale and coal intervals were very prone to fail when well drilled with deviation between 600 to 850. The stable mud weight computed from PoW for drilling through these intervals is 1.40-1.45 g/cc, where as it is 1.20-1.25 g/cc from conventional isotropy wellbore stability model, which was not enough to keep wellbore stable. Based on results from PoW modeling, drilling mud weight scheme was updated and applied to another 3 horizontal wells planned at nearby location. All these three wells were drilled and completed safely without severe wellbore instability issue. In these wells’ 216mm (8.5 in) section, wellbore instability related non-productive time (NPT) was reduced about 11.5 days per well and section time was reduced about 26 days per well.\n This PoW modeling was first time applied in wellbore stability analysis for horizontal well drilling at Ordos Basin and the results are satisfied and encouraged. The insights provided in this paper suggests that, for drilling in other locations with similar instability challenges, PoW modeling will be a better choice to provide solution and recommendation to ensure drilling safely, improve drilling efficiency and reduce drilling costs.","PeriodicalId":11267,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Thu, March 28, 2019","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Thu, March 28, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2523/IPTC-19381-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Drilling horizontal wells in YB gas field in Ordos Basin presents significant challenges due to severe wellbore instabilities problems in drilling through Permian Lower Shihezi and Upper Shanxi formations, where laminated shales overlies with sand and coal seam. In first phase of horizontal wells drilling, most wells encountered severe wellbore instabilities including pack-off, stuck-pipe, over-pull, drilling pipe lost in hole and even side track. Post-well analysis showed that these horizontal wells instabilities mainly occurred in Permian Lower Shihezi and Upper Shanxi formation where most cavings and drilling events (stuck-pipe, over-pull) were observed. In contrast, vertical exploration wells have no such instability issues in same interval. To analyze and understand the mechanism of wellbore instability issue and provide optimal mud weight and better drilling practice to reduce the risk of wellbore instabilities, an anisotropic wellbore stability modeling using Plane-of-Weakness (PoW) failure criterion was carried out in this study. The PoW failure criterion is adopted to compute the onset of rock shear sliding and/or fracture along a weak plane (bedding or fracture) and identify the potential wellbore instability risk in drilling through anisotropic rock formations. The influence of bedding orientation, rock anisotropic elastic and strength properties, and wellbore trajectory on the wellbore stability are all included in the model. This paper describes the process and workflow of conducting PoW wellbore stability modeling for YB field wellbore drilling. The proposed drilling parameters (stable mud weight) from the modeling and its application and improvement for next wells drilling, are also included. The analysis showed that the laminated shale and coal intervals were very prone to fail when well drilled with deviation between 600 to 850. The stable mud weight computed from PoW for drilling through these intervals is 1.40-1.45 g/cc, where as it is 1.20-1.25 g/cc from conventional isotropy wellbore stability model, which was not enough to keep wellbore stable. Based on results from PoW modeling, drilling mud weight scheme was updated and applied to another 3 horizontal wells planned at nearby location. All these three wells were drilled and completed safely without severe wellbore instability issue. In these wells’ 216mm (8.5 in) section, wellbore instability related non-productive time (NPT) was reduced about 11.5 days per well and section time was reduced about 26 days per well. This PoW modeling was first time applied in wellbore stability analysis for horizontal well drilling at Ordos Basin and the results are satisfied and encouraged. The insights provided in this paper suggests that, for drilling in other locations with similar instability challenges, PoW modeling will be a better choice to provide solution and recommendation to ensure drilling safely, improve drilling efficiency and reduce drilling costs.
改进的弱点面法在鄂尔多斯盆地水平井钻井中取得成功
鄂尔多斯盆地YB气田在二叠系下石河子组和上山西组地层钻井时存在严重的井筒不稳定性问题,钻井难度较大。在水平井钻井的第一阶段,大多数井都会遇到严重的井筒不稳定问题,包括封隔、卡钻、过拔、钻杆掉入井中甚至侧钻。井后分析表明,这些水平井不稳定主要发生在二叠系下石河子组和上山西组,在这些组中观察到的垮塌和钻井事件(卡钻、超拔)最多。而垂直探井在相同井段内则不存在这种不稳定问题。为了分析和理解井筒失稳问题的机理,为降低井筒失稳风险提供最优泥浆比重和更好的钻井实践,本研究采用弱平面(PoW)失效准则建立了各向异性井筒稳定性模型。采用PoW破坏准则计算沿弱平面(层理或裂缝)岩石剪切滑动和/或破裂的起始点,识别各向异性岩层钻井时潜在的井筒失稳风险。模型考虑了层理方向、岩石各向异性弹性和强度特性以及井筒轨迹对井筒稳定性的影响。本文介绍了YB油田钻井PoW井筒稳定性建模的过程和工作流程。本文还介绍了从模型中提出的钻井参数(稳定泥浆比重)及其在后续钻井中的应用和改进。分析表明,当井斜在600 ~ 850之间时,层状页岩和煤层层段极易发生失稳。根据PoW计算出的钻井液稳定密度为1.40 ~ 1.45 g/cc,而传统的各向同性井筒稳定模型计算出的钻井液稳定密度为1.20 ~ 1.25 g/cc,不足以保证井筒稳定。根据PoW建模结果,更新了钻井泥浆比重方案,并将其应用于附近位置的另外3口水平井。这三口井均安全钻完井,没有出现严重的井筒失稳问题。在这些井的216mm (8.5 In)井段中,与井筒不稳定相关的非生产时间(NPT)每口井减少了约11.5天,每口井的分段时间减少了约26天。该模型首次应用于鄂尔多斯盆地水平井钻井的井筒稳定性分析,结果令人满意和鼓舞。本文的见解表明,对于其他具有类似不稳定挑战的钻井地点,PoW建模将是更好的选择,为确保钻井安全,提高钻井效率和降低钻井成本提供解决方案和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信