Comparison of biofloc formation from microalgal cultivation by auto- and bacteria-associated types of flocculation

Tran Thi Ngoc Thu, Nguyen Thi Dong Phuong, Tran Van Luan, Le Thi Van Anh
{"title":"Comparison of biofloc formation from microalgal cultivation by auto- and bacteria-associated types of flocculation","authors":"Tran Thi Ngoc Thu, Nguyen Thi Dong Phuong, Tran Van Luan, Le Thi Van Anh","doi":"10.15625/1811-4989/17053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Microalgal harvesting has still been a challenge to investigators who take their investiment into microalgal production. The cost for microalgal downstream processing is as high as 20% of the total production of biodiesel. Among hundreds of curent methods of biomass harvesting, autoflocculation and bacteria-based aggregation are still being researched and applied in large-scale producuion. This study implemented a comparison of how microalgal cells aggregate large bioflocs according to two types of flocculation. The microalgal autoflocculation was implemented by adding Ca2+ or Mg2+ with an increase of pH to 11, resulting in cell biomass of 13.7 or 15.5 mg/l, respectively. Meanwhile, the bioflocculation under the support of Bacillus subtilis MT300405 and Escherichia coli ATCC 85922 could produce large bioflocs with a cell biomass of 1.5 times higher than the autoflocculation case without the influence of pH. Moreover, images from scanning electron microscopy indicated differences between two types of flocculation. With the presence of bacteria, microalgal cells were more tightly bound by a membrane or a layer of extracellular polimeric substance, inducing to form large bioflocs. This was not found under autoflocculation.","PeriodicalId":23622,"journal":{"name":"Vietnam Journal of Biotechnology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vietnam Journal of Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15625/1811-4989/17053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Microalgal harvesting has still been a challenge to investigators who take their investiment into microalgal production. The cost for microalgal downstream processing is as high as 20% of the total production of biodiesel. Among hundreds of curent methods of biomass harvesting, autoflocculation and bacteria-based aggregation are still being researched and applied in large-scale producuion. This study implemented a comparison of how microalgal cells aggregate large bioflocs according to two types of flocculation. The microalgal autoflocculation was implemented by adding Ca2+ or Mg2+ with an increase of pH to 11, resulting in cell biomass of 13.7 or 15.5 mg/l, respectively. Meanwhile, the bioflocculation under the support of Bacillus subtilis MT300405 and Escherichia coli ATCC 85922 could produce large bioflocs with a cell biomass of 1.5 times higher than the autoflocculation case without the influence of pH. Moreover, images from scanning electron microscopy indicated differences between two types of flocculation. With the presence of bacteria, microalgal cells were more tightly bound by a membrane or a layer of extracellular polimeric substance, inducing to form large bioflocs. This was not found under autoflocculation.
微藻培养中自动絮凝和细菌相关絮凝形成生物絮团的比较
对于那些投资于微藻生产的研究人员来说,微藻的收获仍然是一个挑战。微藻下游加工的成本高达生物柴油总产量的20%。在现有的数百种生物质收获方法中,自絮凝法和细菌聚集法仍在研究和大规模生产应用中。本研究对微藻细胞如何根据两种絮凝方式聚集大型生物絮凝体进行了比较。通过添加Ca2+或Mg2+,将pH值提高到11,实现微藻自絮凝,细胞生物量分别为13.7和15.5 mg/l。同时,在不受ph影响的情况下,枯草芽孢杆菌MT300405和大肠杆菌ATCC 85922支持下的生物絮凝可以产生较大的生物絮凝体,其细胞生物量是自絮凝体的1.5倍。扫描电镜图像显示了两种絮凝体之间的差异。随着细菌的存在,微藻细胞被膜或细胞外聚合物层更紧密地结合,诱导形成大的生物絮团。这在自动絮凝中没有发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信