Orthodontic bonding to high-copper amalgam with different adhesive cements

Mustafa �lker, S. Malkoç, Hayriye �lker, M. Yalçın, M. Malkoç
{"title":"Orthodontic bonding to high-copper amalgam with different adhesive cements","authors":"Mustafa �lker, S. Malkoç, Hayriye �lker, M. Yalçın, M. Malkoç","doi":"10.4103/2321-4619.176015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strengths of metal brackets bonded by four different adhesive cements to high-copper amalgam surfaces. Materials and Methods: A commonly used dental amalgam (nongamma 2, lathe-cut, high-copper alloy) (Cavex Avalloy, Cavex) was triturated according to the manufacturers′ directions, and then condensed into a cylindrical (diameter: 8 mm, depth: 2 mm) undercut cavity prepared in auto polymerized acrylic resin. Exposed surfaces of 100 specimens were polished with 400, 600, 800, and 1200 grit paper and cleaned for 10 min under running tap water, air-dried, sandblasted for 3 s with 50-micron aluminum oxide abrasive, and coated with alloy primer (Alloy PrimerTM, Kuraray). Lower incisors metal brackets were bonded to prepared surfaces with an orthodontic composite Transbond XT (3M) (control) and four adhesive cements: C and B Metabond (Parkell), Panavia F 2.0 (Kuraray), Resinomer (Bisco), and Bis Cem (Bisco). After 24 h, all samples were tested for shear bond strength with the universal test machine. The data were calculated as MPa and statistically analyzed. Results: Statistically bond strengths of Panavia F 2.0 and C and B Metabond were higher than the bond strengths of Bis Cem and Resinomer (P < 0.05). There was no difference between the bond strength of control group (Transbond XT) and the other adhesive cements tested (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Bonding the brackets to sand blasted and alloy primer coated amalgam surfaces can be achieved by traditional orthodontic composites (Transbond XT). Panavia F 2.0 and C and B Metabond adhesive cements may improve bonding to high-copper amalgam.","PeriodicalId":17076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Restorative Dentistry","volume":"62 1","pages":"7 - 10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Restorative Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2321-4619.176015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the shear bond strengths of metal brackets bonded by four different adhesive cements to high-copper amalgam surfaces. Materials and Methods: A commonly used dental amalgam (nongamma 2, lathe-cut, high-copper alloy) (Cavex Avalloy, Cavex) was triturated according to the manufacturers′ directions, and then condensed into a cylindrical (diameter: 8 mm, depth: 2 mm) undercut cavity prepared in auto polymerized acrylic resin. Exposed surfaces of 100 specimens were polished with 400, 600, 800, and 1200 grit paper and cleaned for 10 min under running tap water, air-dried, sandblasted for 3 s with 50-micron aluminum oxide abrasive, and coated with alloy primer (Alloy PrimerTM, Kuraray). Lower incisors metal brackets were bonded to prepared surfaces with an orthodontic composite Transbond XT (3M) (control) and four adhesive cements: C and B Metabond (Parkell), Panavia F 2.0 (Kuraray), Resinomer (Bisco), and Bis Cem (Bisco). After 24 h, all samples were tested for shear bond strength with the universal test machine. The data were calculated as MPa and statistically analyzed. Results: Statistically bond strengths of Panavia F 2.0 and C and B Metabond were higher than the bond strengths of Bis Cem and Resinomer (P < 0.05). There was no difference between the bond strength of control group (Transbond XT) and the other adhesive cements tested (P > 0.05). Conclusion: Bonding the brackets to sand blasted and alloy primer coated amalgam surfaces can be achieved by traditional orthodontic composites (Transbond XT). Panavia F 2.0 and C and B Metabond adhesive cements may improve bonding to high-copper amalgam.
不同黏合剂与高铜汞合金的正畸粘接
目的:比较四种不同粘结剂对高铜汞合金表面金属托槽的剪切粘结强度。材料与方法:将常用的牙用汞合金(nongamma 2,车床切割,高铜合金)(Cavex Avalloy, Cavex)按照生产厂家的说明进行研磨,然后用自动聚合丙烯酸树脂制成圆柱形(直径:8mm,深度:2mm)的凹边腔。用400、600、800和1200砂纸对100个试样的暴露表面进行抛光,并在自来水下清洗10 min,风干,用50微米氧化铝磨料喷砂3 s,涂上合金底漆(alloy PrimerTM, Kuraray)。下门牙金属托槽用正畸复合材料Transbond XT (3M)(对照)和四种粘合剂粘合在制备好的表面上:C和B Metabond (Parkell), Panavia F 2.0 (Kuraray), Resinomer (Bisco)和Bis Cem (Bisco)。24h后,用万能试验机对所有试样进行剪切粘结强度测试。数据以MPa计算,并进行统计学分析。结果:Panavia f2.0与C、B Metabond的结合强度显著高于Bis Cem与Resinomer的结合强度(P < 0.05)。对照组(Transbond XT)粘结强度与其他粘结剂粘结强度比较差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。结论:传统的正畸复合材料(Transbond XT)可以实现托槽与喷砂和合金底漆涂层银汞合金表面的粘接。Panavia f2.0和C、B Metabond胶结剂可改善与高铜汞合金的结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信