The dainty: the aesthetics of female film stardom in the transitional period

IF 0.5 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Pansy Duncan
{"title":"The dainty: the aesthetics of female film stardom in the transitional period","authors":"Pansy Duncan","doi":"10.1080/17460654.2021.2074945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article discusses ‘the dainty’, an aesthetic category that rose to prominence in the trade and fan press during American cinema’s transitional era as a means of characterizing female stars like Lillian Gish, Mary Pickford, Marguerite Clarke, Billie Rhodes and Lois Wilson. The readiest reading of the dainty is that, like the stars the term often described, it was a throwback to an older, diminutive ideal of femininity that bore little relation to the ‘modern’ woman as she was emerging in the early twentieth century at the intersection of aesthetic modernism and industrial modernity. This article, however, contends that the dainty has more in common with paradigmatically modern aesthetics like ‘glamour’ than one might initially suppose. As I show, the dainty’s modernity is twofold. First, it lies in the category’s objective register, where its formal qualities, most notably its diminutiveness, afford it an unexpected affinity with modernist mandates of restraint and reduction. Second, it lies in the category’s subjective register, where its association with ‘fastidiousness’ suggests a calculating and discriminating form of aesthetic subjectivity that is peculiarly modern by virtue of its aesthetic reflexivity. In paying close attention to one of the specifically aesthetic categories that define female star images at this period, I join a small coterie of scholars, like Lea Jacobs and Rosalind Galt, who have set out to explore the aesthetic formations through which we evaluate and experience film and film-adjacent phenomena.","PeriodicalId":42697,"journal":{"name":"Early Popular Visual Culture","volume":"63 1","pages":"324 - 341"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Popular Visual Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17460654.2021.2074945","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article discusses ‘the dainty’, an aesthetic category that rose to prominence in the trade and fan press during American cinema’s transitional era as a means of characterizing female stars like Lillian Gish, Mary Pickford, Marguerite Clarke, Billie Rhodes and Lois Wilson. The readiest reading of the dainty is that, like the stars the term often described, it was a throwback to an older, diminutive ideal of femininity that bore little relation to the ‘modern’ woman as she was emerging in the early twentieth century at the intersection of aesthetic modernism and industrial modernity. This article, however, contends that the dainty has more in common with paradigmatically modern aesthetics like ‘glamour’ than one might initially suppose. As I show, the dainty’s modernity is twofold. First, it lies in the category’s objective register, where its formal qualities, most notably its diminutiveness, afford it an unexpected affinity with modernist mandates of restraint and reduction. Second, it lies in the category’s subjective register, where its association with ‘fastidiousness’ suggests a calculating and discriminating form of aesthetic subjectivity that is peculiarly modern by virtue of its aesthetic reflexivity. In paying close attention to one of the specifically aesthetic categories that define female star images at this period, I join a small coterie of scholars, like Lea Jacobs and Rosalind Galt, who have set out to explore the aesthetic formations through which we evaluate and experience film and film-adjacent phenomena.
精致:转型期女影星的审美
摘要:本文讨论了“精致”这一美学范畴,它在美国电影转型时期在行业和粉丝媒体中崭露头角,作为刻画莉莲·吉什、玛丽·皮克福德、玛格丽特·克拉克、比莉·罗兹和洛伊斯·威尔逊等女明星的一种手段。最直接的解读是,就像这个词经常描述的明星一样,它是对一种古老的、小巧的女性理想的回归,与20世纪初出现在审美现代主义和工业现代性交汇处的“现代”女性没有什么关系。然而,这篇文章认为,精致与典型的现代美学(如“魅力”)有更多的共同之处,而不是人们最初想象的那样。正如我所展示的,这种精致的现代性是双重的。首先,它存在于这个类别的客观范围内,它的正式品质,最明显的是它的小巧,使它与现代主义的约束和简化的要求有着意想不到的亲和力。其次,它存在于范畴的主观域中,它与“挑剔”的联系暗示了一种计算和辨别的审美主体性形式,这种形式由于其审美反身性而特别现代。在密切关注这一时期定义女性明星形象的特定美学类别之一时,我加入了Lea Jacobs和Rosalind Galt等学者的小圈子,他们开始探索我们评估和体验电影和电影相关现象的美学形态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Early Popular Visual Culture
Early Popular Visual Culture HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
50
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书