Evaluation of Endophytic Trichoderma and Other Microbes for Potential Biocontrol of Ganoderma Basal Stem Rot Disease on Oil Palm Seedlings

The Planter Pub Date : 2020-05-25 DOI:10.56333/tp.2020.005
D. Haryadi, H. Hendra, M. Sidhu, Tumpal Panjaitan, Y. Samosir, M. Sharma
{"title":"Evaluation of Endophytic Trichoderma and Other Microbes for Potential Biocontrol of Ganoderma Basal Stem Rot Disease on Oil Palm Seedlings","authors":"D. Haryadi, H. Hendra, M. Sidhu, Tumpal Panjaitan, Y. Samosir, M. Sharma","doi":"10.56333/tp.2020.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To minimise infection risk and impact of basal stem rot (BSR) disease on its new second generation oil palm replants, Asian Agri has adopted a four stage integrated disease management (IDM) strategy of which, protection of newly planted oil palm seedlings with an effective biocontrol agent is an important component. At its R & D Centre, evaluation of soil microbes is being carried out in three phases. Potential microbes from in vitro laboratory screenings (phase 1) are further tested in the nursery (phase 2) with final validation of successful candidates in field trials (phase 3). This paper reports on the results of eight nursery trials which evaluated a total of 42 in-house Endophytic Trichoderma (ET) isolates and 13 commercial bioagent products for their effectiveness in controlling the BSR pathogen, Ganoderma boninense. All 42 ET isolates conferred some degree of protection to the oil palm seedlings against Ganoderma infection, when compared to the unprotected control seedlings. Nevertheless, there were significant differences in the efficacy of the 42 ET isolates. Ten ET isolates averaged below 25 per cent disease incidence (DI) of which, ET 501 was the most effective and most consistent in performance. ET 501 recorded a low average DI of only 14 per cent as compared to 81 per cent in the control seedlings. Its consistency in performance was reflected in all eight trials with a narrow DI range of 6 - 20 per cent as compared to a DI of 73 - 88 per cent in the control seedlings. The high DI range in the control seedlings in all eight trials also confirmed the aggressive pathogenicity of the Ganoderma isolate used for screening. The latter is critical, as low values could lead to wrong interpretation and analysis of the performance of the products being tested. Of the 13 commercial products evaluated, all conferred some degree of protection to the inoculated seedlings, although only five products recorded average DI levels below 50 per cent (range: 21 - 43 per cent). However, none of the 13 commercial products were as effective as Asian Agri’s ET 501 isolate, which consistently recorded the lowest DI values in these comparative screening trials. Laboratory and nursery screening is invaluable, as they help to identify and shortlist potential candidates for final evaluation in the field. Direct screening in the field would be costly and time consuming, in view of the large number of isolates and products to be tested. However, field validation is vital as soil chemistry, climate and microbial populations in the rhizosphere may differ between nursery and field, hence affecting the efficacy of the applied bioagents. In view of this, the most promising ET isolates are being further tested in field trials on both mineral and peat soils, to confirm their effectiveness prior to commercial use. Keywords: Basal stem rot, Endophytic Trichoderma, Ganoderma boninense, oil palm seedlings","PeriodicalId":22956,"journal":{"name":"The Planter","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Planter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56333/tp.2020.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To minimise infection risk and impact of basal stem rot (BSR) disease on its new second generation oil palm replants, Asian Agri has adopted a four stage integrated disease management (IDM) strategy of which, protection of newly planted oil palm seedlings with an effective biocontrol agent is an important component. At its R & D Centre, evaluation of soil microbes is being carried out in three phases. Potential microbes from in vitro laboratory screenings (phase 1) are further tested in the nursery (phase 2) with final validation of successful candidates in field trials (phase 3). This paper reports on the results of eight nursery trials which evaluated a total of 42 in-house Endophytic Trichoderma (ET) isolates and 13 commercial bioagent products for their effectiveness in controlling the BSR pathogen, Ganoderma boninense. All 42 ET isolates conferred some degree of protection to the oil palm seedlings against Ganoderma infection, when compared to the unprotected control seedlings. Nevertheless, there were significant differences in the efficacy of the 42 ET isolates. Ten ET isolates averaged below 25 per cent disease incidence (DI) of which, ET 501 was the most effective and most consistent in performance. ET 501 recorded a low average DI of only 14 per cent as compared to 81 per cent in the control seedlings. Its consistency in performance was reflected in all eight trials with a narrow DI range of 6 - 20 per cent as compared to a DI of 73 - 88 per cent in the control seedlings. The high DI range in the control seedlings in all eight trials also confirmed the aggressive pathogenicity of the Ganoderma isolate used for screening. The latter is critical, as low values could lead to wrong interpretation and analysis of the performance of the products being tested. Of the 13 commercial products evaluated, all conferred some degree of protection to the inoculated seedlings, although only five products recorded average DI levels below 50 per cent (range: 21 - 43 per cent). However, none of the 13 commercial products were as effective as Asian Agri’s ET 501 isolate, which consistently recorded the lowest DI values in these comparative screening trials. Laboratory and nursery screening is invaluable, as they help to identify and shortlist potential candidates for final evaluation in the field. Direct screening in the field would be costly and time consuming, in view of the large number of isolates and products to be tested. However, field validation is vital as soil chemistry, climate and microbial populations in the rhizosphere may differ between nursery and field, hence affecting the efficacy of the applied bioagents. In view of this, the most promising ET isolates are being further tested in field trials on both mineral and peat soils, to confirm their effectiveness prior to commercial use. Keywords: Basal stem rot, Endophytic Trichoderma, Ganoderma boninense, oil palm seedlings
油棕幼苗上内生木霉及其他微生物防治灵芝基腐病潜力的评价
为了最大限度地降低基底茎腐病(BSR)对其新种植的第二代油棕的感染风险和影响,亚洲农业采用了四阶段综合疾病管理(IDM)策略,其中使用有效的生物防治剂保护新种植的油棕幼苗是一个重要组成部分。在其研发中心,土壤微生物的评估分三个阶段进行。来自体外实验室筛选的潜在微生物将在苗圃(阶段1)进一步测试(阶段2),并在现场试验(阶段3)中对成功的候选微生物进行最终验证。本文报告了8项苗圃试验的结果,这些试验评估了总共42种室内内生木霉(ET)分离株和13种商业生物制剂产品对BSR病原体——博南灵芝(Ganoderma boninense)的控制效果。与未受保护的对照幼苗相比,所有42个ET分离株都在一定程度上保护油棕幼苗免受灵芝感染。然而,42个ET分离株的疗效有显著差异。10种ET菌株的平均发病率低于25% (DI),其中,ET 501最有效,性能最稳定。ET 501的平均DI仅为14%,而对照幼苗的DI为81%。其表现的一致性反映在所有8个试验中,DI范围狭窄,为6 - 20%,而对照苗的DI范围为73 - 88%。在所有8个试验中,对照苗的高DI范围也证实了用于筛选的灵芝分离物的侵袭致病性。后者至关重要,因为较低的值可能导致对被测产品性能的错误解释和分析。在评估的13种商业产品中,所有产品都对接种的幼苗提供了一定程度的保护,尽管只有5种产品的平均DI水平低于50%(范围:21% - 43%)。然而,13种商业产品中没有一种与亚洲农业的ET 501分离物一样有效,后者在这些比较筛选试验中始终记录着最低的DI值。实验室和苗圃筛查是非常宝贵的,因为它们有助于确定和筛选潜在的候选人,以便在现场进行最终评估。鉴于需要检测的分离株和产品数量众多,在现场进行直接筛选既昂贵又耗时。然而,田间验证是至关重要的,因为苗圃和田间的土壤化学、气候和根际微生物种群可能不同,从而影响所施用生物制剂的效果。鉴于此,最有希望的ET分离物正在矿物和泥炭土上进行进一步的实地试验,以便在商业使用之前确认其有效性。关键词:根茎腐病,内生木霉,博宁灵芝,油棕幼苗
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信