Why we need statistical static timing analysis

C. Forzan, D. Pandini
{"title":"Why we need statistical static timing analysis","authors":"C. Forzan, D. Pandini","doi":"10.1109/ICCD.2007.4601885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As technology continues to advance deeper into the nanometer regime, a tight control on the process parameters is increasingly difficult. As a consequence, variability has turned out to be a dominant factor in the design of complex ICs. Traditional static timing analysis (STA) is becoming insufficient to accurately evaluate the process variation impact on the design performance considering the increasing number of process, power supply voltage, and temperature (PVT) corners. In contrast, statistical static timing analysis (SSTA) is a promising innovative technique to handle increasingly larger environmental and process fluctuations, especially on-chip parameter variations. However, the statistical approach needs a set of costly additional data such as an accurate process variation description, and a statistical standard cell library characterization. In this paper, STA and SSTA are applied on a real industrial design to compare the two techniques, in terms of both accuracy and cost. From our analysis, we have concluded that the potential advantages offered by SSTA exceed the additional library characterization cost and process data assembly effort.","PeriodicalId":6306,"journal":{"name":"2007 25th International Conference on Computer Design","volume":"26 1","pages":"91-96"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 25th International Conference on Computer Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCD.2007.4601885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

As technology continues to advance deeper into the nanometer regime, a tight control on the process parameters is increasingly difficult. As a consequence, variability has turned out to be a dominant factor in the design of complex ICs. Traditional static timing analysis (STA) is becoming insufficient to accurately evaluate the process variation impact on the design performance considering the increasing number of process, power supply voltage, and temperature (PVT) corners. In contrast, statistical static timing analysis (SSTA) is a promising innovative technique to handle increasingly larger environmental and process fluctuations, especially on-chip parameter variations. However, the statistical approach needs a set of costly additional data such as an accurate process variation description, and a statistical standard cell library characterization. In this paper, STA and SSTA are applied on a real industrial design to compare the two techniques, in terms of both accuracy and cost. From our analysis, we have concluded that the potential advantages offered by SSTA exceed the additional library characterization cost and process data assembly effort.
为什么我们需要统计静态时序分析
随着纳米技术的不断深入,对工艺参数的严格控制变得越来越困难。因此,可变性已被证明是复杂集成电路设计中的一个主要因素。考虑到工艺、电源电压和温度(PVT)角的增加,传统的静态时序分析(STA)已不足以准确评估工艺变化对设计性能的影响。相比之下,统计静态时序分析(SSTA)是一种很有前途的创新技术,可以处理越来越大的环境和工艺波动,特别是片上参数变化。然而,统计方法需要一组昂贵的附加数据,如准确的过程变化描述和统计标准细胞库特征。本文将STA和SSTA应用于实际工业设计中,从精度和成本两方面对两种技术进行比较。从我们的分析中,我们得出结论,SSTA提供的潜在优势超过了额外的库表征成本和过程数据组装工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信