Shear capacity of inverted-U reinforced concrete bridge beams

IF 0.9 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Mahes P. Rajakaruna, V. Vimonsatit, K. Wong
{"title":"Shear capacity of inverted-U reinforced concrete bridge beams","authors":"Mahes P. Rajakaruna, V. Vimonsatit, K. Wong","doi":"10.1080/13287982.2022.2060546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Existing reinforced concrete inverted-U beam bridges in Western Australia built using standard beams designed by Public Works Department between 1957 and 1969 were found to have reinforcement anchorage detail at supports not adequate when assessed using recent design standards. Tests were carried out on six full-size bridge beams recovered from a bridge scheduled for replacement to determine whether the deficient detailing adversely affects the shear capacities of these beams. These beams were the longest of the series designed in 1957. In addition, the mean shear strengths of the five bridge beams to AS 5100.5–2004 and to the most recent design standard AS 5100.5–2017 were determined and these were compared with their corresponding test values. It was found from testing that the detail does not affect the shear strength much. The predicted mean shear capacities using AS 5100.5–2017 were found to be more conservative than the corresponding values using AS 5100.5–2004. This suggests the likelihood of low load ratings for shear using the latest design standard (based on the Modified Compression Field Theory) for existing reinforced concrete bridges designed to previous standards.","PeriodicalId":45617,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2022.2060546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Existing reinforced concrete inverted-U beam bridges in Western Australia built using standard beams designed by Public Works Department between 1957 and 1969 were found to have reinforcement anchorage detail at supports not adequate when assessed using recent design standards. Tests were carried out on six full-size bridge beams recovered from a bridge scheduled for replacement to determine whether the deficient detailing adversely affects the shear capacities of these beams. These beams were the longest of the series designed in 1957. In addition, the mean shear strengths of the five bridge beams to AS 5100.5–2004 and to the most recent design standard AS 5100.5–2017 were determined and these were compared with their corresponding test values. It was found from testing that the detail does not affect the shear strength much. The predicted mean shear capacities using AS 5100.5–2017 were found to be more conservative than the corresponding values using AS 5100.5–2004. This suggests the likelihood of low load ratings for shear using the latest design standard (based on the Modified Compression Field Theory) for existing reinforced concrete bridges designed to previous standards.
倒u型钢筋混凝土桥梁梁抗剪承载力研究
西澳大利亚现有的钢筋混凝土倒u型梁桥使用1957年至1969年由公共工程部设计的标准梁建造,在使用最新的设计标准进行评估时,发现支撑处的钢筋锚固细节不足。对从预定更换的桥梁中恢复的六个全尺寸桥梁梁进行了试验,以确定细节缺陷是否会对这些梁的剪切能力产生不利影响。这些梁是1957年设计的系列梁中最长的。此外,根据AS 5100.5-2004和最新设计标准AS 5100.5-2017,确定了五座桥梁梁的平均抗剪强度,并将其与相应的测试值进行了比较。试验结果表明,细部对抗剪强度影响不大。使用AS 5100.5-2017预测的平均抗剪能力比使用AS 5100.5-2004的相应值更为保守。这表明使用最新设计标准(基于修正压缩场理论)的现有钢筋混凝土桥梁的低剪切荷载等级的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Structural Engineering (AJSE) is published under the auspices of the Structural College Board of Engineers Australia. It fulfils part of the Board''s mission for Continuing Professional Development. The journal also offers a means for exchange and interaction of scientific and professional issues and technical developments. The journal is open to members and non-members of Engineers Australia. Original papers on research and development (Technical Papers) and professional matters and achievements (Professional Papers) in all areas relevant to the science, art and practice of structural engineering are considered for possible publication. All papers and technical notes are peer-reviewed. The fundamental criterion for acceptance for publication is the intellectual and professional value of the contribution. Occasionally, papers previously published in essentially the same form elsewhere may be considered for publication. In this case acknowledgement to prior publication must be included in a footnote on page one of the manuscript. These papers are peer-reviewed as new submissions. The length of acceptable contributions typically should not exceed 4,000 to 5,000 word equivalents. Longer manuscripts may be considered at the discretion of the Editor. Technical Notes typically should not exceed about 1,000 word equivalents. Discussions on a Paper or Note published in the AJSE are welcomed. Discussions must address significant matters related to the content of a Paper or Technical Note and may include supplementary and critical comments and questions regarding content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信