Management characteristics of beef cattle production in Hawaii1

Senorpe Asem-Hiablie , C. Alan Rotz , J. Dale Sandlin , M’Randa R. Sandlin , Robert C. Stout
{"title":"Management characteristics of beef cattle production in Hawaii1","authors":"Senorpe Asem-Hiablie ,&nbsp;C. Alan Rotz ,&nbsp;J. Dale Sandlin ,&nbsp;M’Randa R. Sandlin ,&nbsp;Robert C. Stout","doi":"10.15232/pas.2017-01691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A comprehensive life cycle assessment of the US beef value chain requires the collection of region-specific data for accurate characterization of the country’s diverse production practices. Cattle production in Hawaii is very different from the rest of the country due to its unique ecosystem and geographic location. A survey of cattle producers provided information on herd size and characteristics, grazing management, forage and feed sources, and marketing. Ranch survey responses represented 44% of the state’s beef cows with operation sizes varying from 5 to 10,000 cows. Most cows (79%) were maintained on operations that finished at least some of their cattle, and the majority of those operations finished cattle on forage without concentrate feeds. Cattle were kept on natural pastures ranging in size from 16 to 52,610 ha per ranch with a stocking rate of 2.4 ha/cow on cow-calf operations and 2.0 ha/animal on operations that included older growing animals. Common forage species were <em>Panicum maximum</em> (guinea or green panic grass), <em>Pennisetum clandestinum</em> (kikuyugrass), <em>Digitaria eriantha</em> (pangola or digitgrass), and <em>Trifolium repens</em> (white clover). Reported cow and finished cattle BW were 498 ± 52 kg and 493 ± 75 kg, respectively. More ranchers marketed their beef cattle through wholesalers or distributors (34%) rather than directly to consumers (24%), retailers (20%), or other channels (17%). Marketing under grass-fed certification was reported by 39% of ranches. Information obtained is being used to define management characteristics for modeling production systems and performing a comprehensive assessment of the sustainability of beef cattle production.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":22841,"journal":{"name":"The Professional Animal Scientist","volume":"34 2","pages":"Pages 167-176"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.15232/pas.2017-01691","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Professional Animal Scientist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1080744618300299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

A comprehensive life cycle assessment of the US beef value chain requires the collection of region-specific data for accurate characterization of the country’s diverse production practices. Cattle production in Hawaii is very different from the rest of the country due to its unique ecosystem and geographic location. A survey of cattle producers provided information on herd size and characteristics, grazing management, forage and feed sources, and marketing. Ranch survey responses represented 44% of the state’s beef cows with operation sizes varying from 5 to 10,000 cows. Most cows (79%) were maintained on operations that finished at least some of their cattle, and the majority of those operations finished cattle on forage without concentrate feeds. Cattle were kept on natural pastures ranging in size from 16 to 52,610 ha per ranch with a stocking rate of 2.4 ha/cow on cow-calf operations and 2.0 ha/animal on operations that included older growing animals. Common forage species were Panicum maximum (guinea or green panic grass), Pennisetum clandestinum (kikuyugrass), Digitaria eriantha (pangola or digitgrass), and Trifolium repens (white clover). Reported cow and finished cattle BW were 498 ± 52 kg and 493 ± 75 kg, respectively. More ranchers marketed their beef cattle through wholesalers or distributors (34%) rather than directly to consumers (24%), retailers (20%), or other channels (17%). Marketing under grass-fed certification was reported by 39% of ranches. Information obtained is being used to define management characteristics for modeling production systems and performing a comprehensive assessment of the sustainability of beef cattle production.

夏威夷肉牛生产的管理特点
要对美国牛肉价值链进行全面的生命周期评估,需要收集特定地区的数据,以便准确描述该国不同的生产实践。由于其独特的生态系统和地理位置,夏威夷的养牛生产与该国其他地区非常不同。对牛生产者的调查提供了关于牛群规模和特征、放牧管理、牧草和饲料来源以及销售的信息。牧场调查反映了该州44%的肉牛,经营规模从5头到1万头不等。大多数奶牛(79%)的饲养过程中至少有一部分牛的产肉量,其中大多数奶牛的产肉量为饲料,不含精料饲料。每个牧场的自然牧场面积从16公顷到52,610公顷不等,小牛场的放养率为2.4公顷/头,包括老年牲畜的放养率为2.0公顷/头。常见的牧草种类有大草(豚草或绿草)、狼尾草(菊草)、马地黄(马地黄或洋地黄)和三叶草(白三叶草)。报告奶牛和产肉牛体重分别为498±52 kg和493±75 kg。更多的牧场主通过批发商或分销商销售肉牛(34%),而不是直接向消费者(24%)、零售商(20%)或其他渠道(17%)销售肉牛。39%的牧场报告了草饲认证下的营销。所获得的资料正在用于确定生产系统建模的管理特征,并对肉牛生产的可持续性进行全面评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信