Making an impact: Have we got it right yet?

J. Craissati, C. Campbell
{"title":"Making an impact: Have we got it right yet?","authors":"J. Craissati, C. Campbell","doi":"10.1093/MED/9780198791874.003.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This concluding chapter adopts a formulation-based approach to reflect on the tough question of whether the Offender Personality Disorder (OPD) pathway has achieved a real impact in terms of the national strategy’s high-level outcomes. First, the explicit and implicit premises of the former Dangerous and Severe Personality Disorder (DSPD) developments are considered, contrasting them with those underpinning the OPD pathway strategy. It is suggested that while DSPD was predicated on an illness model, the OPD strategy more accurately reflects a public health model, with the associated benefits and disadvantages. Second, the evidence for impact to date is summarized. Third, the high-level strategy outcomes are reworked in line with our theoretical model to achieve a more coherent articulation of the hypothesized mechanism of change within the pathway.","PeriodicalId":19711,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Medicine Online","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Medicine Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/MED/9780198791874.003.0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This concluding chapter adopts a formulation-based approach to reflect on the tough question of whether the Offender Personality Disorder (OPD) pathway has achieved a real impact in terms of the national strategy’s high-level outcomes. First, the explicit and implicit premises of the former Dangerous and Severe Personality Disorder (DSPD) developments are considered, contrasting them with those underpinning the OPD pathway strategy. It is suggested that while DSPD was predicated on an illness model, the OPD strategy more accurately reflects a public health model, with the associated benefits and disadvantages. Second, the evidence for impact to date is summarized. Third, the high-level strategy outcomes are reworked in line with our theoretical model to achieve a more coherent articulation of the hypothesized mechanism of change within the pathway.
产生影响:我们做对了吗?
最后一章采用了一种基于公式的方法来反思罪犯人格障碍(OPD)途径是否在国家战略的高水平成果方面取得了真正的影响这一棘手问题。首先,考虑了前危险和严重人格障碍(DSPD)发展的显性和隐性前提,并将其与OPD路径策略的基础进行了对比。这表明,虽然DSPD是基于疾病模型,但OPD战略更准确地反映了公共卫生模型,以及相关的利弊。其次,总结了迄今为止影响的证据。第三,根据我们的理论模型重新设计高层次战略结果,以实现对路径内假设变化机制的更连贯的表述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信