The Great Lakes Silviculture Library: Insights into a Case Study Platform

Robert Lane Moser, E. Sagor, M. Russell, M. Windmuller-Campione
{"title":"The Great Lakes Silviculture Library: Insights into a Case Study Platform","authors":"Robert Lane Moser, E. Sagor, M. Russell, M. Windmuller-Campione","doi":"10.1093/jofore/fvab062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Innovation and knowledge exchange are critical to foster adaptive management and continual learning. Across the spectrum of knowledge exchange, ranging from peer-reviewed research to anecdotes, there is a largely untapped middle ground: real-world silvicultural case studies implemented and documented by foresters. The University of Minnesota Great Lakes Silviculture Library is a novel, freely available platform designed to enable foresters to exchange these case studies. Five years after its launch, we conducted focus groups with foresters from Minnesota and Wisconsin, USA, and Ontario, Canada, to explore the platform’s usage and value. Participants valued having access to examples of silvicultural treatments and their outcomes that they could easily digest, apply, and share. They gained new knowledge from management across administrative boundaries. They also appreciated the consistent, relatable case study format. However, participants noted that limited time was the primary barrier to wider authorship and readership. The Library enables information exchange across agencies and disciplines within natural resources, giving greater voice to practicing foresters and supplementing other sources of forestry knowledge.\n \n \n \n In our experience, foresters have always valued opportunities to exchange ideas and anecdotes about silvicultural treatments. Case studies represent one way for foresters to communicate with each other and continue to learn by seeing a variety of silvicultural prescriptions implemented on the landscape. Documenting treatments and the supporting reasoning allows foresters to share lessons learned over the course of their career with others across administrative boundaries. Normalizing this documentation can create a positive feedback loop for a case study platform in which further case study submissions lead to increased visibility, use, and perceived value of the platform. As the case study platform becomes more relevant to foresters, the forestry profession as a whole benefits from the long-term documentation of an increasingly diverse array of treatments.\n","PeriodicalId":23386,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Journal of Forestry","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Journal of Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvab062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Innovation and knowledge exchange are critical to foster adaptive management and continual learning. Across the spectrum of knowledge exchange, ranging from peer-reviewed research to anecdotes, there is a largely untapped middle ground: real-world silvicultural case studies implemented and documented by foresters. The University of Minnesota Great Lakes Silviculture Library is a novel, freely available platform designed to enable foresters to exchange these case studies. Five years after its launch, we conducted focus groups with foresters from Minnesota and Wisconsin, USA, and Ontario, Canada, to explore the platform’s usage and value. Participants valued having access to examples of silvicultural treatments and their outcomes that they could easily digest, apply, and share. They gained new knowledge from management across administrative boundaries. They also appreciated the consistent, relatable case study format. However, participants noted that limited time was the primary barrier to wider authorship and readership. The Library enables information exchange across agencies and disciplines within natural resources, giving greater voice to practicing foresters and supplementing other sources of forestry knowledge. In our experience, foresters have always valued opportunities to exchange ideas and anecdotes about silvicultural treatments. Case studies represent one way for foresters to communicate with each other and continue to learn by seeing a variety of silvicultural prescriptions implemented on the landscape. Documenting treatments and the supporting reasoning allows foresters to share lessons learned over the course of their career with others across administrative boundaries. Normalizing this documentation can create a positive feedback loop for a case study platform in which further case study submissions lead to increased visibility, use, and perceived value of the platform. As the case study platform becomes more relevant to foresters, the forestry profession as a whole benefits from the long-term documentation of an increasingly diverse array of treatments.
五大湖森林文化图书馆:对案例研究平台的见解
创新和知识交流对于促进适应性管理和持续学习至关重要。在知识交流的各个领域,从同行评议的研究到奇闻轶事,有一个很大程度上尚未开发的中间地带:由林业工作者实施和记录的真实森林文化案例研究。明尼苏达大学五大湖森林文化图书馆是一个新颖的,免费提供的平台,旨在使林务人员能够交换这些案例研究。在推出五年后,我们与来自美国明尼苏达州和威斯康星州以及加拿大安大略省的林业人员进行了焦点小组讨论,以探索该平台的使用和价值。与会者重视获得他们可以轻松消化、应用和分享的造林治疗实例及其结果。他们从跨行政边界的管理中获得了新知识。他们还赞赏连贯、相关的案例研究形式。然而,与会者指出,有限的时间是扩大作者和读者的主要障碍。图书馆使各机构和学科之间能够在自然资源领域进行信息交流,使从事林业工作的人有更大的发言权,并补充其他林业知识来源。根据我们的经验,林务人员一直很重视交流关于造林治疗的想法和轶事的机会。案例研究是林务人员相互交流的一种方式,并通过在景观中实施各种造林处方来继续学习。记录处理方法和支持推理使森林管理员能够与跨行政边界的其他人分享其职业生涯中的经验教训。规范化该文档可以为案例研究平台创建一个积极的反馈循环,在这个循环中,进一步的案例研究提交可以提高平台的可见性、使用率和感知价值。随着案例研究平台与林农的关系越来越密切,林业行业作为一个整体受益于日益多样化的处理方法的长期记录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信