ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT LEARNING THAT UNDERPIN TEACHERS’ FEEDBACK PRACTICES

Verónica Yáñez-Monje
{"title":"ASSUMPTIONS ABOUT LEARNING THAT UNDERPIN TEACHERS’ FEEDBACK PRACTICES","authors":"Verónica Yáñez-Monje","doi":"10.36315/2023v1end114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper seeks to examine models of cognition and of learning and its possible alignment with formative assessment. This, using feedback as an entry point to have access to teachers’ actions and interpretations in the intertwining that takes place between teaching, learning, and assessment. Data is informed by doctoral research conducted in three primary schools in England. The empirical work was undertaken by classroom observation and teachers’ follow up interviews. The main findings foregrounded different participants’ views. For some teachers the strategies used to provide feedback such as modelling skewed towards instruction, which resonates with the idea of making judgments about what is missing within tasks, with the teacher exerting the prime role within interaction by taking responsibility for the pupils’ misunderstandings. Another relevant notion was assessment as learning (Torrance, 2007), which consisted of feedback actions focused on specifying what were the necessary features to be completed to meet the objective which resembled a hierarchical sense of how these elements or criteria should be taught and learnt (James, 2006; Marshall & Drummond, 2006). Results also depicted teachers’ assumptions regarded to talk and shared learning, which trace some similarities with cognitive and constructivist perspectives of learning. The corresponding actions were enacted by encouraging their pupils to use conceptual and strategic resources in collaboration when discussing on their writing tasks. These practices also involved pupils’ suggestions on the criteria already proposed by the teacher. Finally, the study also revealed a teacher’s perspective portrayed as Questioning means learning, which reflected how teacher provided their students with evaluative experience when the task was ongoing. In this view, a link could be made with a sociocultural approach as students took ownership of both, the learning and the assessment process.","PeriodicalId":93546,"journal":{"name":"Education and new developments","volume":"155-156 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and new developments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36315/2023v1end114","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper seeks to examine models of cognition and of learning and its possible alignment with formative assessment. This, using feedback as an entry point to have access to teachers’ actions and interpretations in the intertwining that takes place between teaching, learning, and assessment. Data is informed by doctoral research conducted in three primary schools in England. The empirical work was undertaken by classroom observation and teachers’ follow up interviews. The main findings foregrounded different participants’ views. For some teachers the strategies used to provide feedback such as modelling skewed towards instruction, which resonates with the idea of making judgments about what is missing within tasks, with the teacher exerting the prime role within interaction by taking responsibility for the pupils’ misunderstandings. Another relevant notion was assessment as learning (Torrance, 2007), which consisted of feedback actions focused on specifying what were the necessary features to be completed to meet the objective which resembled a hierarchical sense of how these elements or criteria should be taught and learnt (James, 2006; Marshall & Drummond, 2006). Results also depicted teachers’ assumptions regarded to talk and shared learning, which trace some similarities with cognitive and constructivist perspectives of learning. The corresponding actions were enacted by encouraging their pupils to use conceptual and strategic resources in collaboration when discussing on their writing tasks. These practices also involved pupils’ suggestions on the criteria already proposed by the teacher. Finally, the study also revealed a teacher’s perspective portrayed as Questioning means learning, which reflected how teacher provided their students with evaluative experience when the task was ongoing. In this view, a link could be made with a sociocultural approach as students took ownership of both, the learning and the assessment process.
支持教师反馈实践的关于学习的假设
本文旨在研究认知和学习模型及其与形成性评估的可能一致性。通过反馈作为切入点,可以了解教师在教学、学习和评估之间相互交织的过程中的行为和解释。数据来源于在英国三所小学进行的博士研究。实证工作采用课堂观察和教师随访访谈的方式进行。研究的主要发现突出了不同参与者的观点。对于一些教师来说,用于提供反馈的策略,如建模偏向于教学,这与对任务中缺失的内容做出判断的想法产生共鸣,教师通过对学生的误解承担责任,在互动中发挥主要作用。另一个相关的概念是作为学习的评估(Torrance, 2007),它由反馈行动组成,重点是指定实现目标所需完成的必要特征,类似于如何教授和学习这些元素或标准的层次感(James, 2006;Marshall & Drummond, 2006)。结果还描述了教师对谈话和共享学习的假设,这与认知主义和建构主义的学习观点有一些相似之处。通过鼓励学生在讨论写作任务时合作使用概念和策略资源,制定了相应的行动。这些实践还涉及到学生对老师已经提出的标准的建议。最后,该研究还揭示了教师的观点,即提问意味着学习,这反映了教师如何在任务进行时为学生提供评估经验。在这种观点中,可以与社会文化方法建立联系,因为学生掌握了学习和评估过程的所有权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信