Indigenizing Islamism in Indonesia: Prosperous Justice Party’s Approaches Towards Traditionalist Muslims

IF 0.7 2区 哲学 Q1 HISTORY
Ken Miichi
{"title":"Indigenizing Islamism in Indonesia: Prosperous Justice Party’s Approaches Towards Traditionalist Muslims","authors":"Ken Miichi","doi":"10.1080/21567689.2023.2190893","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Islamist groups, based on their philosophical and associational genealogy, are considered to be Salafist in outlook and hostile to or, at best, ignorant of traditionalist Muslim teachings and customs. In contrast to this common understanding of Islamists, support for the Prosperous Justice Party in Indonesia’s traditionalist Muslim constituencies has grown. This article investigates the conditions that favour the broad alignment between Islamist and traditionalist Muslims, focusing on the Islamist party’s approaches toward traditionalist Muslim constituencies based on an examination of the party’s internal documents and interviews with key individuals. Particularly in regions where traditionalist Muslim associations predominate yet have weak ties to political parties, the newly emerging Islamist party has a bigger chance to rise. Moreover, in successful cases, Islamist activists have individually built grassroots networks and expanded the voices of traditionalist Muslims. By showing the changes in the social anchoring of Islamists in Indonesia, this article reverses the dichotomy between Islamists and traditionalists and asserts the Islamists’ indigenization.","PeriodicalId":44955,"journal":{"name":"Politics Religion & Ideology","volume":"77 1","pages":"120 - 133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics Religion & Ideology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21567689.2023.2190893","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Islamist groups, based on their philosophical and associational genealogy, are considered to be Salafist in outlook and hostile to or, at best, ignorant of traditionalist Muslim teachings and customs. In contrast to this common understanding of Islamists, support for the Prosperous Justice Party in Indonesia’s traditionalist Muslim constituencies has grown. This article investigates the conditions that favour the broad alignment between Islamist and traditionalist Muslims, focusing on the Islamist party’s approaches toward traditionalist Muslim constituencies based on an examination of the party’s internal documents and interviews with key individuals. Particularly in regions where traditionalist Muslim associations predominate yet have weak ties to political parties, the newly emerging Islamist party has a bigger chance to rise. Moreover, in successful cases, Islamist activists have individually built grassroots networks and expanded the voices of traditionalist Muslims. By showing the changes in the social anchoring of Islamists in Indonesia, this article reverses the dichotomy between Islamists and traditionalists and asserts the Islamists’ indigenization.
印尼伊斯兰教本土化:繁荣正义党对传统穆斯林的态度
伊斯兰教团体,基于他们的哲学和关联谱系,被认为在观点上是萨拉菲斯特的,对传统的穆斯林教义和习俗充满敌意,或者充其量是无知的。与对伊斯兰主义者的这种普遍理解相反,印尼传统穆斯林选区对繁荣正义党(prosperity Justice Party)的支持有所增长。本文调查了有利于伊斯兰主义者和传统主义穆斯林之间广泛结盟的条件,重点关注伊斯兰政党对传统主义穆斯林选区的做法,这是基于对该党内部文件的审查和对关键人物的采访。特别是在传统的穆斯林协会占主导地位,但与政党关系薄弱的地区,新兴的伊斯兰政党有更大的机会崛起。此外,在一些成功的案例中,伊斯兰激进分子个别建立了草根网络,扩大了传统穆斯林的声音。本文通过展示印尼伊斯兰主义者社会锚定的变化,扭转了伊斯兰主义者与传统主义者之间的二分法,并断言伊斯兰主义者的本土化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
45
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信