Procedural Customization & the Limits of Internal Market Law: The ECJ Conducting the Judicial Dialogue

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW
L. Michaux
{"title":"Procedural Customization & the Limits of Internal Market Law: The ECJ Conducting the Judicial Dialogue","authors":"L. Michaux","doi":"10.54648/leie2022018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Analyses on the limits of EU internal market law mainly focus on substantive evolutions regarding the underlying concepts. However, once the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has clarified the scope of the free movement principles, the ball is then passed to the national judiciary. In the future application of these boundaries, the judicial dialogue remains crucial to ensure an effective and correct implementation of EU law. This interaction is based on a set of procedural guidelines. Whereas such rules might appear as fixed circumstances, this article will demonstrate how the ECJ – through different dynamics – ensures the correct interaction between substantive and procedural evolutions. This ‘procedural customization’ will be uncovered regarding two central limits of EU internal market law: de minimis thresholds, and the purely internal situation doctrine.\ninternal market law, field of application, limits, de minimis, purely internal situation, preliminary references, European Court of Justice, procedural customization","PeriodicalId":42718,"journal":{"name":"Legal Issues of Economic Integration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Issues of Economic Integration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/leie2022018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Analyses on the limits of EU internal market law mainly focus on substantive evolutions regarding the underlying concepts. However, once the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has clarified the scope of the free movement principles, the ball is then passed to the national judiciary. In the future application of these boundaries, the judicial dialogue remains crucial to ensure an effective and correct implementation of EU law. This interaction is based on a set of procedural guidelines. Whereas such rules might appear as fixed circumstances, this article will demonstrate how the ECJ – through different dynamics – ensures the correct interaction between substantive and procedural evolutions. This ‘procedural customization’ will be uncovered regarding two central limits of EU internal market law: de minimis thresholds, and the purely internal situation doctrine. internal market law, field of application, limits, de minimis, purely internal situation, preliminary references, European Court of Justice, procedural customization
程序定制与内部市场法律的局限:欧洲法院的司法对话
对欧盟内部市场法局限性的分析主要集中在基本概念的实质性演变上。然而,一旦欧洲法院(ECJ)明确了自由流动原则的范围,就会把球传给国家司法机构。在这些边界的未来应用中,司法对话对于确保欧盟法律的有效和正确实施仍然至关重要。这种交互是基于一套程序指导方针的。虽然这些规则可能看起来是固定的情况,但本文将展示欧洲法院如何通过不同的动态确保实体和程序演变之间的正确互动。这种“程序定制”将揭示欧盟内部市场法律的两个中心限制:最低限度门槛和纯粹的内部情况学说。内部市场法律,适用领域,限制,最低限度,纯粹的内部情况,初步参考,欧洲法院,程序定制
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信