Perioperative Outcomes of Endoscopic versus Open Operation in the Treatment of Hyperparathyroidism: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IF 0.6
Zhen Wu, Lili Yi, Yongkun Wang, Changxin Zhou, Shanping Sun, Yu-min Yao, Q. Lv, Jugao Fang
{"title":"Perioperative Outcomes of Endoscopic versus Open Operation in the Treatment of Hyperparathyroidism: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis","authors":"Zhen Wu, Lili Yi, Yongkun Wang, Changxin Zhou, Shanping Sun, Yu-min Yao, Q. Lv, Jugao Fang","doi":"10.5455/jcmr.2023.14.01.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Hyperparathyroidism can cause multiple organs damage, which is characterized by diversity and systemic. At present, there are mainly drug treatment and surgical treatment, among which surgical treatment has the highest cure rate. Surgical treatment mainly includes endoscopic and open surgery in clinical. This article systematically reviewed previously published trials on the two surgical methods, and provided an updated meta-analysis of the perioperative outcomes of different surgical methods on hyperparathyroidism. Methods: We searched 7 online databases home and abroad retrieval time till 3 February, 2021. We studied the influence of endoscopic and open surgery on the perioperative outcome of hyperparathyroidism. Data were processed with RevMan 5.3 and Stata 12.0. The methodological quality assessment of non-randomized clinical trials used risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. The cochrane collaboration's tool for assessing bias risk was used to assess the quality of the included randomized controlled studies. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume and hospital stay were examined. Two authors exchanged and checked the extraction tables, and resolved any inconsistencies by discussing. Results: A total of 4 studies were included, including 124 patients and 246 controls. The combined results of random-effect model: WMD (95% CI)=-12.96 minutes (-43.47, 17.54) , P=0.40. Similarly, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume and hospital stay also showed significant heterogeneity (I2>50%), but the combined results were statistically significant. Meta-analysis results of the three indicators (WMD (95%CI)) were as follows: -10.59 (-15.64, -5.54) mL, P<0.001; -11.69 (-19.65, -3.73) mL, P=0.004; -1.02 (-1.88, -0.16) days, P=0.02. In addition to the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume and hospital stay of the intervention group were significantly lower than the control group. Conclusions: This paper concluded that endoscopic surgery showed certain advantages over open surgery in the treatment of hyperparathyroidism by performed the meta-analysis of clinical studies on the treatment of hyperparathyroidism, which the finding could provide theoretical guidance for clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":41505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Complementary Medicine Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Complementary Medicine Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/jcmr.2023.14.01.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Hyperparathyroidism can cause multiple organs damage, which is characterized by diversity and systemic. At present, there are mainly drug treatment and surgical treatment, among which surgical treatment has the highest cure rate. Surgical treatment mainly includes endoscopic and open surgery in clinical. This article systematically reviewed previously published trials on the two surgical methods, and provided an updated meta-analysis of the perioperative outcomes of different surgical methods on hyperparathyroidism. Methods: We searched 7 online databases home and abroad retrieval time till 3 February, 2021. We studied the influence of endoscopic and open surgery on the perioperative outcome of hyperparathyroidism. Data were processed with RevMan 5.3 and Stata 12.0. The methodological quality assessment of non-randomized clinical trials used risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. The cochrane collaboration's tool for assessing bias risk was used to assess the quality of the included randomized controlled studies. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume and hospital stay were examined. Two authors exchanged and checked the extraction tables, and resolved any inconsistencies by discussing. Results: A total of 4 studies were included, including 124 patients and 246 controls. The combined results of random-effect model: WMD (95% CI)=-12.96 minutes (-43.47, 17.54) , P=0.40. Similarly, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume and hospital stay also showed significant heterogeneity (I2>50%), but the combined results were statistically significant. Meta-analysis results of the three indicators (WMD (95%CI)) were as follows: -10.59 (-15.64, -5.54) mL, P<0.001; -11.69 (-19.65, -3.73) mL, P=0.004; -1.02 (-1.88, -0.16) days, P=0.02. In addition to the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage volume and hospital stay of the intervention group were significantly lower than the control group. Conclusions: This paper concluded that endoscopic surgery showed certain advantages over open surgery in the treatment of hyperparathyroidism by performed the meta-analysis of clinical studies on the treatment of hyperparathyroidism, which the finding could provide theoretical guidance for clinical practice.
内窥镜与开放手术治疗甲状旁腺功能亢进围手术期疗效:系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的:甲状旁腺功能亢进可引起多脏器损害,具有多样性和全身性的特点。目前主要有药物治疗和手术治疗,其中手术治疗治愈率最高。手术治疗在临床上主要包括内窥镜手术和开放手术。本文系统回顾了先前发表的两种手术方法的试验,并对不同手术方法治疗甲状旁腺功能亢进的围手术期结果进行了更新的荟萃分析。方法:检索国内外7个在线数据库,检索时间截止到2021年2月3日。我们研究了内镜和开放手术对甲状旁腺功能亢进围手术期疗效的影响。数据处理软件为RevMan 5.3和Stata 12.0。非随机临床试验的方法学质量评估采用干预措施的非随机研究的偏倚风险。cochrane合作的偏倚风险评估工具用于评估纳入的随机对照研究的质量。观察手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量及住院时间。两位作者交换并核对了提取表,并通过讨论解决了任何不一致之处。结果:共纳入4项研究,患者124例,对照组246例。随机效应模型联合结果:WMD (95% CI)=-12.96 min (-43.47, 17.54), P=0.40。同样,术中出血量、术后引流量和住院时间也存在显著异质性(I2>50%),但综合结果具有统计学意义。三项指标的meta分析结果(WMD (95%CI))为:-10.59 (-15.64,-5.54)mL, P<0.001;-11.69 (-19.65, -3.73) mL, P=0.004;-1.02(-1.88, -0.16)天,P=0.02。除手术时间外,干预组术中出血量、术后引流量、住院时间均显著低于对照组。结论:本文通过对治疗甲状旁腺功能亢进的临床研究进行meta分析,得出内镜手术治疗甲状旁腺功能亢进优于开放手术的结论,该发现可为临床实践提供理论指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Journal of Intercultural Ethnopharmacology (2146-8397) Between (2012 Volume 1, Issue 1 - 2018 Volume 7, Issue 1). Journal of Complementary Medicine Research is aimed to serve a contemporary approach to the knowledge about world-wide usage of complementary medicine and their empirical and evidence-based effects. ISSN: 2577-5669
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信