Pediatric Anisometropia: Case Series and Review

{"title":"Pediatric Anisometropia: Case Series and Review","authors":"","doi":"10.31707/vdr2020.6.1.p32","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The etiology and natural course and history of pediatric anisometropia are incompletely understood. This article reviews the literature regarding pediatric anisometropia with much of the review integrated into a case series. The review and case reports are intended to elevate clinical understanding of pediatric anisometropia including and especially treatment outcomes.\n\nCase Reports: Case one is anisomyopia with amblyopia that resulted in a poor treatment outcome despite outstanding compliance with prescribed spectacles, vision therapy, and occlusion. Case two is anisometropia caused by organic vision loss from optic neuritis early in life. Case three is an infant with hyperopic anisometropia and esotropia. The esotropia did not respond to spectacles and home based vision therapy. Neonatal high bilateral hyperopia that converted to anisometropia because of early onset cosmetically invisible unilateral esotropia is speculated. Case four describes a boy\ndiagnosed with hyperopic anisometropia at age 11 months coincident with a diagnosis\nof pseudoesotropia. His compliance with prescribed spectacles was spotty until age\nthree years. An outstanding visual outcome was achieved by age five years with spectacles only (no occlusion therapy). Case five concerns a boy who acquired hyperopic anisometropia because one eye experienced increasing hyperopia during his toddler years. His response to treatment, spectacles and part time occlusion with home vision therapy, was outstanding. Case six is an infant diagnosed with 2.50 diopters of hyperopic anisometropia at age six months. Monocular home based vison developmental activities, not glasses, were prescribed. Her anisometropia vanished\nthree months later.\n\nConclusions: Pediatric anisometropia presents and responds to treatment in a variety of ways that challenge clinical care. Etiology and age of onset, which usually elude clinicians, can explain this variety. Additional research is required to improve clinical outcomes.","PeriodicalId":91423,"journal":{"name":"Vision development and rehabilitation","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vision development and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31707/vdr2020.6.1.p32","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The etiology and natural course and history of pediatric anisometropia are incompletely understood. This article reviews the literature regarding pediatric anisometropia with much of the review integrated into a case series. The review and case reports are intended to elevate clinical understanding of pediatric anisometropia including and especially treatment outcomes. Case Reports: Case one is anisomyopia with amblyopia that resulted in a poor treatment outcome despite outstanding compliance with prescribed spectacles, vision therapy, and occlusion. Case two is anisometropia caused by organic vision loss from optic neuritis early in life. Case three is an infant with hyperopic anisometropia and esotropia. The esotropia did not respond to spectacles and home based vision therapy. Neonatal high bilateral hyperopia that converted to anisometropia because of early onset cosmetically invisible unilateral esotropia is speculated. Case four describes a boy diagnosed with hyperopic anisometropia at age 11 months coincident with a diagnosis of pseudoesotropia. His compliance with prescribed spectacles was spotty until age three years. An outstanding visual outcome was achieved by age five years with spectacles only (no occlusion therapy). Case five concerns a boy who acquired hyperopic anisometropia because one eye experienced increasing hyperopia during his toddler years. His response to treatment, spectacles and part time occlusion with home vision therapy, was outstanding. Case six is an infant diagnosed with 2.50 diopters of hyperopic anisometropia at age six months. Monocular home based vison developmental activities, not glasses, were prescribed. Her anisometropia vanished three months later. Conclusions: Pediatric anisometropia presents and responds to treatment in a variety of ways that challenge clinical care. Etiology and age of onset, which usually elude clinicians, can explain this variety. Additional research is required to improve clinical outcomes.
儿童屈光参差:病例系列和回顾
背景:儿童屈光参差的病因、自然病程和病史尚不完全清楚。这篇文章回顾了关于儿童屈光参差的文献,其中许多综述纳入了一个病例系列。回顾和病例报告旨在提高对儿童屈光参差的临床认识,特别是治疗结果。病例报告:病例一是斜视合并弱视,尽管按照规定的眼镜、视力治疗和遮挡治疗效果很好,但治疗效果很差。病例二是由早期视神经炎引起的器质性视力丧失引起的屈光参差。病例三是患有远视参差和内斜视的婴儿。内斜视对眼镜和家庭视力治疗没有反应。推测新生儿高度双侧远视,转化为参差,因为早期发病美容隐形单侧内斜视。病例四描述了一个男孩在11个月大时被诊断为远视性屈光参差,同时被诊断为假性屈光参差。直到三岁以前,他戴眼镜的依从性都是参差不齐的。5岁时仅配戴眼镜(无遮挡治疗),视力效果显著。病例五涉及一个男孩谁获得远视参差,因为一只眼睛经历了增加远视在他的幼儿时期。他对治疗的反应,眼镜和部分时间闭塞与家庭视力治疗,是杰出的。病例六是一名婴儿,在6个月大时被诊断为2.50屈光度远视参差。医生要求进行单眼家庭视力发展活动,而不是配戴眼镜。三个月后,她的屈光参差消失了。结论:儿童屈光参差表现出不同的治疗方式,对临床护理提出了挑战。病因和发病年龄,通常逃避临床医生,可以解释这种变化。需要进一步的研究来改善临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信