Glycaemic control in a cardiothoracic surgical population: Exploring the protocol-practice gap

D. Maharaj, H. Perrie, J. Scribante, F. Paruk
{"title":"Glycaemic control in a cardiothoracic surgical population: Exploring the protocol-practice gap","authors":"D. Maharaj, H. Perrie, J. Scribante, F. Paruk","doi":"10.7196/SAJCC.2017.V33I1.280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background . Glycaemic control constitutes an important component in the management of critically ill patients. As such, all healthcare workers involved in the management of critically ill patients need to ensure that it is achieved adequately. To avoid glucose variability and to maintain normoglycaemia, evidence-based protocols are implemented to guide clinical care. However, it has been suggested that with the use of protocoldirected therapy, protocol-practice gaps are common and therefore protocol adherence must be audited regularly. The aim of this study was to evaluate adherence to the glucose control protocol by nurses in the cardiothoracic intensive care unit (ICU) at a tertiary academic hospital. Methods . A retrospective study involving the review of ICU charts of all post-cardiac surgery patients ≥16 years admitted to the cardiothoracic ICU during March 2011. A convenience sampling method was used. Results . A total of 741 glucose readings for 22 patients were evaluated. The median (interquartile range) glucose reading was 7.8 mmol/L (6.7 - 9.3 mmol/L). Overall, 411 (55.5%) protocol violations were recorded and 629 (84.9%) of the total readings were abnormal. Protocol violations were similar between the day and night staff; 188 (54.7%) and 223 (58.5%) were recorded, respectively ( p =0.256). Of the readings, 464 (62.6%) were conducted by ICU-trained nurses and 245 (33.2%) by non-ICU-trained nurses. There were fewer protocol violations recorded by the ICU-trained nurses compared with the non-ICU-trained nurses, i.e. 53.3% and 63.7%, respectively ( p <0.05). Conclusion . Adherence to the glucose-control protocol was suboptimal. These results may suggest that the training and education of healthcare workers in implementing protocols is an ongoing and dynamic process, and that there is a need for the regular evaluation of protocol adherence in order to identify protocol-practice gaps.","PeriodicalId":75194,"journal":{"name":"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society","volume":"8 1","pages":"4-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Southern African journal of critical care : the official journal of the Critical Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/SAJCC.2017.V33I1.280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background . Glycaemic control constitutes an important component in the management of critically ill patients. As such, all healthcare workers involved in the management of critically ill patients need to ensure that it is achieved adequately. To avoid glucose variability and to maintain normoglycaemia, evidence-based protocols are implemented to guide clinical care. However, it has been suggested that with the use of protocoldirected therapy, protocol-practice gaps are common and therefore protocol adherence must be audited regularly. The aim of this study was to evaluate adherence to the glucose control protocol by nurses in the cardiothoracic intensive care unit (ICU) at a tertiary academic hospital. Methods . A retrospective study involving the review of ICU charts of all post-cardiac surgery patients ≥16 years admitted to the cardiothoracic ICU during March 2011. A convenience sampling method was used. Results . A total of 741 glucose readings for 22 patients were evaluated. The median (interquartile range) glucose reading was 7.8 mmol/L (6.7 - 9.3 mmol/L). Overall, 411 (55.5%) protocol violations were recorded and 629 (84.9%) of the total readings were abnormal. Protocol violations were similar between the day and night staff; 188 (54.7%) and 223 (58.5%) were recorded, respectively ( p =0.256). Of the readings, 464 (62.6%) were conducted by ICU-trained nurses and 245 (33.2%) by non-ICU-trained nurses. There were fewer protocol violations recorded by the ICU-trained nurses compared with the non-ICU-trained nurses, i.e. 53.3% and 63.7%, respectively ( p <0.05). Conclusion . Adherence to the glucose-control protocol was suboptimal. These results may suggest that the training and education of healthcare workers in implementing protocols is an ongoing and dynamic process, and that there is a need for the regular evaluation of protocol adherence in order to identify protocol-practice gaps.
心胸外科人群的血糖控制:探索方案与实践的差距
背景。血糖控制是危重病人管理的重要组成部分。因此,所有参与重症患者管理的卫生保健工作者都需要确保充分实现这一目标。为了避免血糖变异性和维持正常血糖,实施循证方案来指导临床护理。然而,有人建议,在使用协议导向治疗时,协议与实践之间的差距很常见,因此必须定期审核协议遵守情况。本研究的目的是评估三级学术医院心胸重症监护病房(ICU)护士对血糖控制方案的依从性。方法。回顾性研究2011年3月期间所有≥16岁的心脏手术后患者入住心胸ICU的ICU图表。采用方便抽样方法。结果。对22例患者的741个葡萄糖读数进行了评估。葡萄糖读数中位数(四分位数范围)为7.8 mmol/L (6.7 - 9.3 mmol/L)。总的来说,411例(55.5%)违反协议,629例(84.9%)读数异常。白班和夜班工作人员违反礼仪的情况相似;分别为188例(54.7%)和223例(58.5%)(p =0.256)。其中,464例(62.6%)由icu培训过的护士进行,245例(33.2%)由非icu培训过的护士进行。重症监护组护士违反协议的发生率低于非重症监护组,分别为53.3%和63.7% (p <0.05)。结论。血糖控制方案的依从性不是最佳的。这些结果可能表明,对卫生保健工作者实施方案的培训和教育是一个持续和动态的过程,需要定期评估方案遵守情况,以确定方案与实践之间的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信