Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL): Interpretation of multiple score reports for ESL placement

IF 0.1 Q4 LINGUISTICS
Kateryna Kokhan
{"title":"Test of English as a Foreign Language (TOEFL): Interpretation of multiple score reports for ESL placement","authors":"Kateryna Kokhan","doi":"10.58379/zjdv7047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The vast majority of U.S. universities nowadays accept TOEFL iBT scores for admission and placement into ESL classes. A significant number of candidates choose to repeat the test hoping to get higher results. Due to the significant increase in the number of international students, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) is currently seeking to find the most cost-effective ESL placement policy which would regulate the ESL placement of TOEFL repeaters. Since there is little published research examining students’ multiple TOEFL iBT score reports, and there are no guidelines for the interpretation of multiple scores provided by the test publisher, this paper attempts to address the issue of interpretation and use of TOEFL iBT repeaters’ scores for making ESL placement decisions in the context of UIUC. The main research question considered in our study was: Which TOEFL iBT scores (official highest, most recent, average or self-reported scores) are the best predictors of ESL placement? The findings indicate that the self-reported and the highest TOEFL iBT scores have the strongest association with the ESL placement results. The self-reported and the highest scores also demonstrate the highest classification efficiency in predicting ESL placement of TOEFL iBT repeaters. The results and implications of the study are discussed.","PeriodicalId":29650,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Language Assessment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Language Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58379/zjdv7047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The vast majority of U.S. universities nowadays accept TOEFL iBT scores for admission and placement into ESL classes. A significant number of candidates choose to repeat the test hoping to get higher results. Due to the significant increase in the number of international students, the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) is currently seeking to find the most cost-effective ESL placement policy which would regulate the ESL placement of TOEFL repeaters. Since there is little published research examining students’ multiple TOEFL iBT score reports, and there are no guidelines for the interpretation of multiple scores provided by the test publisher, this paper attempts to address the issue of interpretation and use of TOEFL iBT repeaters’ scores for making ESL placement decisions in the context of UIUC. The main research question considered in our study was: Which TOEFL iBT scores (official highest, most recent, average or self-reported scores) are the best predictors of ESL placement? The findings indicate that the self-reported and the highest TOEFL iBT scores have the strongest association with the ESL placement results. The self-reported and the highest scores also demonstrate the highest classification efficiency in predicting ESL placement of TOEFL iBT repeaters. The results and implications of the study are discussed.
英语作为外语考试(托福):解释ESL课程的多个分数报告
如今,绝大多数美国大学都接受托福网考成绩作为入学和进入ESL课程的依据。相当多的考生选择重复考试,希望获得更高的成绩。由于国际学生数量的显著增加,伊利诺伊大学厄巴纳-香槟分校(UIUC)目前正在寻求最具成本效益的ESL分班政策,以规范托福复读生的ESL分班。由于很少有发表的研究检查学生的多次托福网考成绩报告,也没有考试出版商提供的多次成绩解释指南,本文试图解决在UIUC背景下解释和使用托福网考复读者的成绩来做出ESL分班决定的问题。在我们的研究中考虑的主要研究问题是:托福网考成绩(官方最高,最近,平均或自我报告的分数)是ESL排名的最佳预测指标?研究结果表明,自我报告和最高托福网考成绩与ESL分班结果有最强的关联。自我报告和最高分数在预测托福网考复读者的ESL排名方面也显示出最高的分类效率。讨论了本研究的结果和意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信