SETH vs Approximation

A. Rubinstein, V. V. Williams
{"title":"SETH vs Approximation","authors":"A. Rubinstein, V. V. Williams","doi":"10.1145/3374857.3374870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our story is about hardness of problems in P, but its roots begin with two algorithmic approaches that have been developed to cope with NP-hard problems: approximation algorithms and fasterthan- brute-force algorithms.\n Approximation algorithms were proposed as a response for NP-hardness almost immediately (in historical perspective of almost half a century), and have been one of the most celebrated success stories of our eld. An outstanding complexity result in this area, which has since turned into a sub- eld of its own, is the Probabilistically Checkable Proof (PCP) Theorem. For many problems like Max-3-SAT we now have nearly tight hardness-of-approximation results.","PeriodicalId":22106,"journal":{"name":"SIGACT News","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIGACT News","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3374857.3374870","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Our story is about hardness of problems in P, but its roots begin with two algorithmic approaches that have been developed to cope with NP-hard problems: approximation algorithms and fasterthan- brute-force algorithms. Approximation algorithms were proposed as a response for NP-hardness almost immediately (in historical perspective of almost half a century), and have been one of the most celebrated success stories of our eld. An outstanding complexity result in this area, which has since turned into a sub- eld of its own, is the Probabilistically Checkable Proof (PCP) Theorem. For many problems like Max-3-SAT we now have nearly tight hardness-of-approximation results.
SETH vs近似
我们的故事是关于P中问题的硬度,但它的根源始于两种算法方法,这两种方法是为了处理np困难问题而开发的:近似算法和比暴力算法更快的算法。近似算法几乎立即被提出作为对np -硬度的响应(从近半个世纪的历史角度来看),并且已经成为我们这个领域最著名的成功故事之一。在这一领域中,一个突出的复杂性结果是概率可检验证明定理(PCP),它已经形成了自己的一个子领域。对于像Max-3-SAT这样的许多问题,我们现在几乎有严格的近似硬度结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信