Biotic responses to low-concentration urban road runoff

Kelli A. Johnson, A. Steinman, William D. Keiper, C. Ruetz
{"title":"Biotic responses to low-concentration urban road runoff","authors":"Kelli A. Johnson, A. Steinman, William D. Keiper, C. Ruetz","doi":"10.1899/10-157.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract A major effect of urbanization on streams is the input of stormwater (SW) runoff from impervious surfaces. This water may contain excess nutrients, heavy metals, and other organic contaminants. These inputs are potential stressors or stimulants for algae, invertebrates, and fish within the aquatic community. We conducted a controlled experiment in mesocosms (∼1300-L tanks) to evaluate the effect of SW quality on different trophic levels. SW runoff was collected before it entered Little Black Creek, which is a tributary draining an urbanized subcatchment in western Michigan. The captured runoff was used to create the following treatments: 0% SW (control, n  =  4), 50% SW (n  =  4), or 100% SW (n  =  4). Nested within each mesocosm were exclosure treatments containing different combinations of algae, snails (Physa sp.), and fish (pumpkinseed: Lepomis gibbosus). SW did not have an overall effect on algal biomass or metabolic activity in the mesocosms. Algal community composition in the 0% SW treatment was significantly different from the 100% treatment at the end of the experiment. Mortality and growth rates of the fish and snails were not significantly affected by SW treatment. The absence of a strong effect of SW on algal biomass and metabolism or fish and snail growth in the mesocosms might have been the result of relatively low concentrations of contaminants in the SW. Changes in algal community composition in the mesocosms suggest that community composition is a more sensitive measure of water quality than either algal biomass or mortality and growth rates of fish and snails. SW quality is extremely variable, even among different storm events at the same location, so extrapolating results from one storm or one system to another should be done with caution. Our findings show that SW quality does not necessarily have negative impacts on stream biota.","PeriodicalId":49987,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the North American Benthological Society","volume":"280 1","pages":"710 - 727"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the North American Benthological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1899/10-157.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Abstract A major effect of urbanization on streams is the input of stormwater (SW) runoff from impervious surfaces. This water may contain excess nutrients, heavy metals, and other organic contaminants. These inputs are potential stressors or stimulants for algae, invertebrates, and fish within the aquatic community. We conducted a controlled experiment in mesocosms (∼1300-L tanks) to evaluate the effect of SW quality on different trophic levels. SW runoff was collected before it entered Little Black Creek, which is a tributary draining an urbanized subcatchment in western Michigan. The captured runoff was used to create the following treatments: 0% SW (control, n  =  4), 50% SW (n  =  4), or 100% SW (n  =  4). Nested within each mesocosm were exclosure treatments containing different combinations of algae, snails (Physa sp.), and fish (pumpkinseed: Lepomis gibbosus). SW did not have an overall effect on algal biomass or metabolic activity in the mesocosms. Algal community composition in the 0% SW treatment was significantly different from the 100% treatment at the end of the experiment. Mortality and growth rates of the fish and snails were not significantly affected by SW treatment. The absence of a strong effect of SW on algal biomass and metabolism or fish and snail growth in the mesocosms might have been the result of relatively low concentrations of contaminants in the SW. Changes in algal community composition in the mesocosms suggest that community composition is a more sensitive measure of water quality than either algal biomass or mortality and growth rates of fish and snails. SW quality is extremely variable, even among different storm events at the same location, so extrapolating results from one storm or one system to another should be done with caution. Our findings show that SW quality does not necessarily have negative impacts on stream biota.
低浓度城市道路径流的生物响应
城市化对河流的主要影响是来自不透水表面的雨水径流的输入。这种水可能含有过量的营养物质、重金属和其他有机污染物。这些输入是水生群落中藻类、无脊椎动物和鱼类的潜在压力源或刺激物。我们在中生态系统(~ 1300 l池)中进行了对照试验,以评估SW质量对不同营养水平的影响。SW径流在进入小黑溪(Little Black Creek)之前被收集起来,小黑溪是密歇根州西部一个城市化集水区的支流。捕获的径流被用于创建以下处理:0% SW(对照,n = 4), 50% SW (n = 4),或100% SW (n = 4)。在每个中生态圈内嵌套的封闭处理包含不同组合的藻类,蜗牛(Physa sp.)和鱼类(南瓜籽:Lepomis gibbosus)。SW对中生态系统的藻类生物量和代谢活性没有总体影响。试验结束时,0% SW处理与100% SW处理的藻类群落组成差异显著。SW处理对鱼和蜗牛的死亡率和生长率无显著影响。西南偏南对中生态系统中藻类生物量和代谢或鱼类和蜗牛生长没有强烈影响,这可能是西南偏南中污染物浓度相对较低的结果。中生态系统中藻类群落组成的变化表明,与藻类生物量或鱼类和蜗牛的死亡率和生长率相比,群落组成是一个更敏感的水质指标。即使在同一地点的不同风暴事件中,SW的质量也是千变万化的,所以将一个风暴或一个系统的结果外推到另一个系统时应该谨慎。我们的研究结果表明,SW质量不一定会对溪流生物区系产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the North American Benthological Society
Journal of the North American Benthological Society 生物-海洋与淡水生物学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3 months
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书