COMPARISON OF TURBULENCE INTEGRAL LENGTH SCALE DETERMINATION METHODS

A. Trush, S. Pospíšil, H. Kozmar
{"title":"COMPARISON OF TURBULENCE INTEGRAL LENGTH SCALE DETERMINATION METHODS","authors":"A. Trush, S. Pospíšil, H. Kozmar","doi":"10.2495/afm200111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Grids at the inlet of the wind-tunnel test section have been commonly used to create turbulent conditions for model experiments concerning civil engineering applications. The parameters of the generated turbulence depend on the geometry of the grid and the distance from the grid to the measurement position. This work presents the experimental results of the grid-generated turbulence and a comparative analysis of an applicability of the von Kármán and Fichtl–McVehil autospectra models and autocorrelation methods (zero-crossing and exponential) for calculation of integral turbulence length scales. A square mesh array of rectangular bars was tested in a closed-circuit low velocity wind tunnel. The initial free stream turbulence was Iu = 0.75%. The measurements were carried out using the X-wire CTA probe installed at distances ranging from 1.35 m to 8.4 m downstream of the tested grid at velocities from 1.5 m/s to 9 m/s. The fitting suitability of various spectral models depends on the inflow velocity and turbulence intensity. Due to a greater flexibility and quantity of fitting coefficients, the Fichtl–McVehil model fits better in the area around the spectral peak at low flow velocity up to 3.4 m/s, while von Kármán models more accurately represent the measured spectrum at higher flow velocities. The methods based on using the correlation coefficients are equally suitable for flows at all measured velocities and turbulence intensities. The exponential method yields more stable distance-toscale characteristics with smaller deviations.","PeriodicalId":23647,"journal":{"name":"WIT transactions on engineering sciences","volume":"10 1","pages":"113-123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WIT transactions on engineering sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2495/afm200111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Grids at the inlet of the wind-tunnel test section have been commonly used to create turbulent conditions for model experiments concerning civil engineering applications. The parameters of the generated turbulence depend on the geometry of the grid and the distance from the grid to the measurement position. This work presents the experimental results of the grid-generated turbulence and a comparative analysis of an applicability of the von Kármán and Fichtl–McVehil autospectra models and autocorrelation methods (zero-crossing and exponential) for calculation of integral turbulence length scales. A square mesh array of rectangular bars was tested in a closed-circuit low velocity wind tunnel. The initial free stream turbulence was Iu = 0.75%. The measurements were carried out using the X-wire CTA probe installed at distances ranging from 1.35 m to 8.4 m downstream of the tested grid at velocities from 1.5 m/s to 9 m/s. The fitting suitability of various spectral models depends on the inflow velocity and turbulence intensity. Due to a greater flexibility and quantity of fitting coefficients, the Fichtl–McVehil model fits better in the area around the spectral peak at low flow velocity up to 3.4 m/s, while von Kármán models more accurately represent the measured spectrum at higher flow velocities. The methods based on using the correlation coefficients are equally suitable for flows at all measured velocities and turbulence intensities. The exponential method yields more stable distance-toscale characteristics with smaller deviations.
湍流积分长度尺度测定方法的比较
风洞试验段入口处的栅格通常用于土木工程模型实验中产生湍流条件。所产生的湍流参数取决于网格的几何形状和网格到测量位置的距离。本文介绍了网格产生的湍流的实验结果,并对von Kármán和Fichtl-McVehil自谱模型和自相关方法(过零和指数)计算积分湍流长度尺度的适用性进行了比较分析。在封闭式低速风洞中对矩形杆的方形网格阵列进行了试验。初始自由流湍流度Iu = 0.75%。测量使用x线CTA探头,安装在测试网格下游1.35米至8.4米的距离上,速度为1.5米/秒至9米/秒。各种光谱模型的拟合适用性取决于入流速度和湍流强度。由于fightl - mcvehil模型具有更大的灵活性和拟合系数的数量,在低流速达3.4 m/s时,该模型在光谱峰附近的拟合效果较好,而von Kármán模型在高流速下更准确地反映了实测光谱。基于相关系数的方法同样适用于所有测量速度和湍流强度的流动。指数法产生更稳定的距离尺度特征和较小的偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书