Evaluation of Concordance between Gleason Scores of Tansrectal Ultrasound Guided Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Samples in Prostate Cancer

M. Değer, V. Izol, F. Gokalp, Y. Bayazıt, I. Aridogan, Z. Tansug
{"title":"Evaluation of Concordance between Gleason Scores of Tansrectal Ultrasound Guided Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Samples in Prostate Cancer","authors":"M. Değer, V. Izol, F. Gokalp, Y. Bayazıt, I. Aridogan, Z. Tansug","doi":"10.6000/1927-7229.2018.07.01.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective : In this study, we investigated the concordance between Gleason scores of transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens in patients diagnosed with prostate cancer via transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy and treated with radical prostatectomy in our clinic. Material and Method : 115 patients were included in our study treated with radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer between the dates of November 2011 and December 2014. Data of these patients are reviewed retrospectively. Results : The average age of the patients was 61.8 ± 6.8 (43-76) years. The average body mass index of these patients were (BMI) 26.7 ± 3.34 (19.3 – 35.3) kg/m². Average PSA value was 6.6 ± 10.1 (1.4 – 80) ng/ml. Gleason scores of transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy and radical prostatectomy were observed concordant in 74 (64.3%) of 115 patients, while 41 (35.6%) were not concordant. Gleason score was decreased by 1 grade for 8.6% (10 patients) of patients, it was increased by 1 for 26.0% (30 patients) of patients and for 0.8% (1 patient) it was increased by 3. Discussion : These findings indicate indicate that Gleason scores of transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy and prostatectomy specimens may be discordant.","PeriodicalId":14957,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Analytical Oncology","volume":"13 1","pages":"8-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Analytical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6000/1927-7229.2018.07.01.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective : In this study, we investigated the concordance between Gleason scores of transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens in patients diagnosed with prostate cancer via transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy and treated with radical prostatectomy in our clinic. Material and Method : 115 patients were included in our study treated with radical prostatectomy for organ-confined prostate cancer between the dates of November 2011 and December 2014. Data of these patients are reviewed retrospectively. Results : The average age of the patients was 61.8 ± 6.8 (43-76) years. The average body mass index of these patients were (BMI) 26.7 ± 3.34 (19.3 – 35.3) kg/m². Average PSA value was 6.6 ± 10.1 (1.4 – 80) ng/ml. Gleason scores of transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy and radical prostatectomy were observed concordant in 74 (64.3%) of 115 patients, while 41 (35.6%) were not concordant. Gleason score was decreased by 1 grade for 8.6% (10 patients) of patients, it was increased by 1 for 26.0% (30 patients) of patients and for 0.8% (1 patient) it was increased by 3. Discussion : These findings indicate indicate that Gleason scores of transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy and prostatectomy specimens may be discordant.
前列腺癌经直肠超声引导活检与根治性前列腺切除术样本Gleason评分的一致性评价
目的:本研究探讨我院临床经直肠超声引导活检确诊前列腺癌并行根治性前列腺切除术的患者经直肠超声引导活检Gleason评分与根治性前列腺切除术标本的一致性。材料与方法:2011年11月至2014年12月,115例接受根治性前列腺切除术治疗的器官局限性前列腺癌患者纳入我们的研究。对这些患者的资料进行回顾性分析。结果:患者平均年龄61.8 ±6.8(43 ~ 76)岁。这些患者的平均体重指数(BMI)为26.7 ±3.34 (19.3 - 35.3) kg/m²。平均PSA值为6.6 ±10.1 (1.4 €80)ng/ml。115例患者经直肠超声引导活检和根治性前列腺切除术Gleason评分一致74例(64.3%),不一致41例(35.6%)。8.6%(10例)患者的Gleason评分降低1级,26.0%(30例)患者的Gleason评分提高1级,0.8%(1例)患者的Gleason评分提高3级。讨论:这些发现提示经直肠超声引导活检和前列腺切除术标本的Gleason评分可能不一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信