Diagnostic utility of cell block technique as an adjunct to cytological smears in evaluation of thyroid aspirates on fine needle aspiration cytology

Q3 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
U. Raina, J. Suri, S. Bhardwaj, B. Sahni
{"title":"Diagnostic utility of cell block technique as an adjunct to cytological smears in evaluation of thyroid aspirates on fine needle aspiration cytology","authors":"U. Raina, J. Suri, S. Bhardwaj, B. Sahni","doi":"10.4103/jnsbm.JNSBM_118_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Direct smears and cell blocks prepared from residual tissue fluids complement each other for establishing a conclusive cytopathologic diagnosis in thyroid lesions. Aim of the Study: Evaluation of the diagnostic utility of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) alone and in combination with cell blocks in the diagnosis of thyroid lesions. Materials and Methods: A hospital-based prospective longitudinal study was conducted in which 100 thyroid smears were categorized as neoplastic, nonneoplastic and inadequate using FNAC and cell block technique. All specimens were classified using point scoring system modified by Mair et al. Direct smears were compared with cell-block specimens on variables of cellularity, background blood and clot, cellular degeneration and retention of appropriate architecture using Fisher's exact and unpaired t-test. Results: Sixty-two percent of cell block specimens showed a moderate amount of background material (P = 0.01), display of excellent architecture was also significantly more in cell block (20%) technique than direct smears (9%), and degree of cellular degeneration was minimal in significantly more cell blocks (26%) than direct smears (12%), thereby making diagnosis easy as opposed to FNAC which yielded more cellular material than cell blocks (P = 0.02). Four cases showing hemorrhagic material on direct smears were diagnosed on cell block as one case each of colloid goiter and chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis and two cases of adenomatous goiter and two cases showing hemorrhagic material on cell block were diagnosed with chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis on direct smears. Conclusion: FNAC and cell block complement each other and combining both techniques improves the diagnostic yield and facilitates accurate diagnosis. It is advisable to perform cell-block for each case of FNAC of thyroid lesions.","PeriodicalId":16373,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Natural Science, Biology, and Medicine","volume":"117 1","pages":"6 - 11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Natural Science, Biology, and Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jnsbm.JNSBM_118_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Direct smears and cell blocks prepared from residual tissue fluids complement each other for establishing a conclusive cytopathologic diagnosis in thyroid lesions. Aim of the Study: Evaluation of the diagnostic utility of fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) alone and in combination with cell blocks in the diagnosis of thyroid lesions. Materials and Methods: A hospital-based prospective longitudinal study was conducted in which 100 thyroid smears were categorized as neoplastic, nonneoplastic and inadequate using FNAC and cell block technique. All specimens were classified using point scoring system modified by Mair et al. Direct smears were compared with cell-block specimens on variables of cellularity, background blood and clot, cellular degeneration and retention of appropriate architecture using Fisher's exact and unpaired t-test. Results: Sixty-two percent of cell block specimens showed a moderate amount of background material (P = 0.01), display of excellent architecture was also significantly more in cell block (20%) technique than direct smears (9%), and degree of cellular degeneration was minimal in significantly more cell blocks (26%) than direct smears (12%), thereby making diagnosis easy as opposed to FNAC which yielded more cellular material than cell blocks (P = 0.02). Four cases showing hemorrhagic material on direct smears were diagnosed on cell block as one case each of colloid goiter and chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis and two cases of adenomatous goiter and two cases showing hemorrhagic material on cell block were diagnosed with chronic lymphocytic thyroiditis on direct smears. Conclusion: FNAC and cell block complement each other and combining both techniques improves the diagnostic yield and facilitates accurate diagnosis. It is advisable to perform cell-block for each case of FNAC of thyroid lesions.
细胞阻滞技术辅助细胞学涂片在细针穿刺细胞学评估甲状腺抽吸的诊断价值
背景:直接涂片和从残余组织液中制备的细胞块相互补充,以建立甲状腺病变的结论性细胞病理学诊断。研究目的:评价细针穿刺细胞学(FNAC)单独和联合细胞阻滞在甲状腺病变诊断中的应用价值。材料和方法:在一项基于医院的前瞻性纵向研究中,使用FNAC和细胞阻断技术将100份甲状腺涂片分为肿瘤、非肿瘤和不充分。所有标本采用Mair等改进的积分评分系统进行分类。使用Fisher精确和非配对t检验,将直接涂片与细胞块标本在细胞密度、背景血和凝块、细胞变性和适当结构保留等变量上进行比较。结果:62%的细胞块标本显示出适量的背景物质(P = 0.01),细胞块技术(20%)比直接涂片(9%)显示出更好的结构,细胞块技术(26%)比直接涂片(12%)显示出最小的细胞变性程度,从而使诊断更容易,而FNAC产生的细胞物质比细胞块多(P = 0.02)。直接涂片显示出血性物质4例,胶质性甲状腺肿和慢性淋巴细胞性甲状腺炎各1例,腺瘤性甲状腺肿和细胞块显示出血性物质2例,直接涂片诊断为慢性淋巴细胞性甲状腺炎。结论:FNAC与细胞阻断具有很强的互补性,两者结合可提高诊断率,有助于准确诊断。建议对每一例甲状腺病变的FNAC进行细胞阻滞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Natural Science, Biology, and Medicine
Journal of Natural Science, Biology, and Medicine Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信