The Beginning of the Christian Era Revisited: New Findings

IF 0.4 0 ARCHITECTURE
L. De Caro, Fernando La Greca, E. Matricciani
{"title":"The Beginning of the Christian Era Revisited: New Findings","authors":"L. De Caro, Fernando La Greca, E. Matricciani","doi":"10.3390/histories1030016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We have re-examined and discussed all chronological, historical and astronomical elements which can be referred to the year of Herod the Great’s death, which occurred—according to Josephus—after a lunar eclipse and before Passover. Since the XIX century, most scholars still assume the eclipse occurred on 13 March 4 BC, so that Dionysius Exiguus was wrong in calculating the beginning of the Christian era—by four years at least—because Herod the Great must have been alive when Jesus was born. We have solved the apparent incompatibility of the events narrated by Josephus, occurring between the eclipse of 13 March 4BC and a too-near Passover (12 April 4 BC), by determining another date after studying all eclipses visible from Jerusalem in near years. This analysis—supported by a novel simulation of naked–eye visibility of partial lunar eclipses—has shown that the most eligible eclipse associable to Herod’s death occurred in the night of 8–9 November 2 AD. Besides this astronomical finding, our conclusion is also supported by significant correlation between segmented sleep and eclipse intervals; by its compatibility with the long sequence of events narrated by Josephus and with the rabbinic tradition about Herod’s death. This dating also agrees with other historical facts connected to Roman and Jewish history. In conclusion, Herod the Great must have died in the first month of 3 AD and, very likely, Dionysius Exiguus was correct.","PeriodicalId":41517,"journal":{"name":"Architectural Histories","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Architectural Histories","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/histories1030016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

We have re-examined and discussed all chronological, historical and astronomical elements which can be referred to the year of Herod the Great’s death, which occurred—according to Josephus—after a lunar eclipse and before Passover. Since the XIX century, most scholars still assume the eclipse occurred on 13 March 4 BC, so that Dionysius Exiguus was wrong in calculating the beginning of the Christian era—by four years at least—because Herod the Great must have been alive when Jesus was born. We have solved the apparent incompatibility of the events narrated by Josephus, occurring between the eclipse of 13 March 4BC and a too-near Passover (12 April 4 BC), by determining another date after studying all eclipses visible from Jerusalem in near years. This analysis—supported by a novel simulation of naked–eye visibility of partial lunar eclipses—has shown that the most eligible eclipse associable to Herod’s death occurred in the night of 8–9 November 2 AD. Besides this astronomical finding, our conclusion is also supported by significant correlation between segmented sleep and eclipse intervals; by its compatibility with the long sequence of events narrated by Josephus and with the rabbinic tradition about Herod’s death. This dating also agrees with other historical facts connected to Roman and Jewish history. In conclusion, Herod the Great must have died in the first month of 3 AD and, very likely, Dionysius Exiguus was correct.
重新审视基督教时代的开端:新发现
我们已经重新检查和讨论了所有时间顺序、历史和天文因素,这些因素都与希律大帝的死有关。根据约瑟夫的说法,希律大帝的死发生在月食之后,逾越节之前。自十九世纪以来,大多数学者仍然认为日食发生在公元前4年3月13日,因此Dionysius Exiguus计算基督教纪元开始的时间是错误的——至少错了四年——因为大希律王在耶稣出生时一定还活着。约瑟夫斯叙述的事件发生在公元前4年3月13日的日食和太近的逾越节(公元前4年4月12日)之间,通过研究近几年在耶路撒冷可见的所有日食,我们确定了另一个日期,解决了这个明显的不相容问题。这一分析得到了一种新的用肉眼观察月偏食的模拟方法的支持,结果表明,与希律王之死最有关联的月食发生在公元2年11月8日至9日的晚上。除了这一天文发现外,我们的结论还得到了分段睡眠与日食间隔的显著相关性的支持;因为它符合约瑟夫斯叙述的一系列事件,也符合拉比关于希律之死的传统。这个年代也与其他与罗马和犹太历史有关的历史事实相一致。总之,大希律王一定死于公元3年的第一个月,很有可能,狄奥尼修斯·埃西古斯是正确的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Architectural Histories
Architectural Histories ARCHITECTURE-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信