{"title":"The Margaret Bailey case","authors":"I. B. Meyering","doi":"10.1108/her-05-2019-0014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nIn March 1969, Brisbane student and political activist Margaret Bailey was suspended from Inala High School – ostensibly for “undermining the authority” of her teacher – prompting claims of political suppression. Through a case study of the subsequent campaign for Bailey’s reinstatement, the purpose of this paper is to explain the emergence of the high school activist as a new political actor in the late 1960s.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe paper draws on newsletters and pamphlets produced by Brisbane activists, alongside articles from the left-wing and mainstream press, to reconstruct the key events of the campaign and trace the major arguments advanced by Bailey and her supporters.\n\n\nFindings\nInitiated by the high school activist group, Students in Dissent (SID), the campaign in support of Bailey lasted over two months, culminating in a “chain-in” staged by Bailey at the Queensland Treasury Building on 8 May. Linking together arguments about students’ rights, civil liberties and democratic government, the campaign reveals how high school activism was enabled not only by the broader climate of political dissent in the late 1960s, but by the increasing emphasis on secondary education as a right of modern citizenship in the preceding decades.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis is the first study of the campaign for Bailey’s reinstatement at Inala High School and one of the only analyses to date of the political mobilisation of high school students in Australia during the late 1960s. The case study of the Bailey campaign underlines that secondary school students were important players in the political contests of the late 1960s and, if only for brief periods, were able to command the attention of education officials, the media and leading politicians. It represents an important historical precedent for contemporary high school activism, including the global School Strike 4 Climate movement.\n","PeriodicalId":43049,"journal":{"name":"History of Education Review","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/her-05-2019-0014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Purpose
In March 1969, Brisbane student and political activist Margaret Bailey was suspended from Inala High School – ostensibly for “undermining the authority” of her teacher – prompting claims of political suppression. Through a case study of the subsequent campaign for Bailey’s reinstatement, the purpose of this paper is to explain the emergence of the high school activist as a new political actor in the late 1960s.
Design/methodology/approach
The paper draws on newsletters and pamphlets produced by Brisbane activists, alongside articles from the left-wing and mainstream press, to reconstruct the key events of the campaign and trace the major arguments advanced by Bailey and her supporters.
Findings
Initiated by the high school activist group, Students in Dissent (SID), the campaign in support of Bailey lasted over two months, culminating in a “chain-in” staged by Bailey at the Queensland Treasury Building on 8 May. Linking together arguments about students’ rights, civil liberties and democratic government, the campaign reveals how high school activism was enabled not only by the broader climate of political dissent in the late 1960s, but by the increasing emphasis on secondary education as a right of modern citizenship in the preceding decades.
Originality/value
This is the first study of the campaign for Bailey’s reinstatement at Inala High School and one of the only analyses to date of the political mobilisation of high school students in Australia during the late 1960s. The case study of the Bailey campaign underlines that secondary school students were important players in the political contests of the late 1960s and, if only for brief periods, were able to command the attention of education officials, the media and leading politicians. It represents an important historical precedent for contemporary high school activism, including the global School Strike 4 Climate movement.
1969年3月,布里斯班的学生和政治活动家玛格丽特·贝利(Margaret Bailey)被伊纳拉高中(Inala High School)停学,表面上是因为“破坏了老师的权威”,这引发了政治镇压的主张。通过对贝利复职运动的个案研究,本文的目的是解释高中活动家作为一种新的政治行动者在20世纪60年代末的出现。设计/方法/方法本文借鉴了布里斯班活动人士制作的时事通讯和小册子,以及左翼和主流媒体的文章,重建了这场运动的关键事件,并追溯了贝利及其支持者提出的主要论点。调查结果由高中活动组织“持不同意见的学生”(SID)发起,支持贝利的运动持续了两个多月,最终于5月8日贝利在昆士兰州财政大楼举行了一次“连锁禁闭”。这场运动将有关学生权利、公民自由和民主政府的争论联系在一起,揭示了高中行动主义是如何不仅受到20世纪60年代末广泛的政治异见氛围的推动,而且还受到此前几十年对中等教育作为现代公民权利的日益重视的推动。原创性/价值这是对贝利在Inala高中复职运动的第一项研究,也是迄今为止对20世纪60年代末澳大利亚高中生政治动员的唯一分析之一。贝利竞选活动的案例研究强调,中学生在20世纪60年代末的政治竞赛中是重要的参与者,即使只是在很短的时间内,也能够引起教育官员、媒体和主要政治家的注意。它代表了当代高中行动主义的重要历史先例,包括全球学校罢工气候运动。