‘Gambilng’ Cropping Patterns: Understanding Karo’s Vegetable Farmers Point of View to Cope with Risks and Uncertainties

Sri Alem Br. Sembiring
{"title":"‘Gambilng’ Cropping Patterns: Understanding Karo’s Vegetable Farmers Point of View to Cope with Risks and Uncertainties","authors":"Sri Alem Br. Sembiring","doi":"10.31289/perspektif.v12i1.8267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to discuss the coping mechanisms of a community in dealing with risks and uncertainties in new situations that have never been part of their local knowledge. The problem is focused on how the subject (farmer) formulates risk and uncertainty, and shows their coping mechanisms to deal with the complexity of the problem. The cultural approach is an important reference for understanding the empirical phenomenon being studied, combined with the concept of dynamic local knowledge and the concept of risk. Data were collected through fieldwork using an emic view approach with observation-participation techniques as well as in-depth interviews and qualitative data analysis processes. This study concludes that farmers have a risk conception which they call “try it out” on 4 sources of risk (air, pest, price, volcanic ash of Mount Sinabung) and develop coping mechanisms through variations in cropping patterns, even the type of 'gambling' as an opportunity for the complexity of the risks that occur. The risk symbols are also classified into 2 types of distribution; individual and communal. The ability to cope with each type proves the innovative capacity of the subjects, which is related to the dynamics of knowledge and the learning process in their community.","PeriodicalId":20002,"journal":{"name":"Perspektif","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspektif","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31289/perspektif.v12i1.8267","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to discuss the coping mechanisms of a community in dealing with risks and uncertainties in new situations that have never been part of their local knowledge. The problem is focused on how the subject (farmer) formulates risk and uncertainty, and shows their coping mechanisms to deal with the complexity of the problem. The cultural approach is an important reference for understanding the empirical phenomenon being studied, combined with the concept of dynamic local knowledge and the concept of risk. Data were collected through fieldwork using an emic view approach with observation-participation techniques as well as in-depth interviews and qualitative data analysis processes. This study concludes that farmers have a risk conception which they call “try it out” on 4 sources of risk (air, pest, price, volcanic ash of Mount Sinabung) and develop coping mechanisms through variations in cropping patterns, even the type of 'gambling' as an opportunity for the complexity of the risks that occur. The risk symbols are also classified into 2 types of distribution; individual and communal. The ability to cope with each type proves the innovative capacity of the subjects, which is related to the dynamics of knowledge and the learning process in their community.
“赌博式”种植模式:了解Karo菜农应对风险和不确定性的观点
本文旨在讨论社区在应对新情况下的风险和不确定性时的应对机制,这些风险和不确定性从未成为他们当地知识的一部分。问题的重点是主体(农民)如何表述风险和不确定性,并展示其应对机制,以应对问题的复杂性。文化方法是理解正在研究的经验现象的重要参考,结合了动态本地知识的概念和风险的概念。数据是通过实地调查收集的,采用主视角方法,结合观察参与技术,以及深度访谈和定性数据分析过程。这项研究的结论是,农民有一种风险观念,他们称之为“尝试”4种风险来源(空气、害虫、价格、锡纳朋火山的火山灰),并通过不同的种植模式制定应对机制,甚至将“赌博”类型作为发生风险复杂性的机会。风险符号也分为两种分布类型;个人和公共。应对每种类型的能力证明了受试者的创新能力,这与他们所在社区的知识动态和学习过程有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信