Genetic resources as an object of international law

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW
A. Vylegzhanin, P. V. Sotskova
{"title":"Genetic resources as an object of international law","authors":"A. Vylegzhanin, P. V. Sotskova","doi":"10.52468/2542-1514.2023.7(1).33-42","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines whether the legal regime of genetic resources is outlined in the context of applicable rules relating to biological diversity. The purpose of the research is to confute the prospects for the formation of a universal legal regime for genetic resources, in the context of the draft UN Agreement on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biological Diversity in Areas beyond National Jurisdiction, and the possibilities of using regional mechanisms in this domain.The methodology of the research includes the formal legal, comparative, historical, systemic and structural methods. The authors analyze and examine applicable international legal sources, including the 1992 Convention on Biological Diversity and its 2010 Nagoya Protocol. On the basis of the systemic and structural method the authors carry out the analysis of the sources of international law related to the conservation and sustainable use of genetic and other biological resources.The main results. The international community’s interest in genetic resources results from the growing need to take more informed environmental decisions. The relevant universal legal basis, created by the 1992 Convention on Biological Diversity, does not provide answers to some important questions, including the detailed legal definition of the term “genetic resources”, though the relevant definition contained in the 1992 Convention remains the only one that has been accepted by a large number of states. It is possible that states will be able to develop a more concrete legal rules relating to the genetic resources in the course of negotiating the UN Agreement on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biological Diversity in Areas beyond National Jurisdiction. However, the development of such a universal international treaty might require a lot of effort in order to reconcile the divergent interests of states.Conclusions. Based on the analysis of applicable international law, the authors assert that the generally outlined legal basis for conservation of biodiversity, laid down by the 1992 Convention, demands further detailing in the modern context. The UN process on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction is likely to take considerable efforts of participating actors before the appropriate legal mechanisms are agreed upon. So regional legal regimes might be an appropriate way to ensure the efficient management of genetic resources taking into account peculiarities of each individual region.","PeriodicalId":40342,"journal":{"name":"Pravoprimenenie-Law Enforcement Review","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pravoprimenenie-Law Enforcement Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52468/2542-1514.2023.7(1).33-42","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article examines whether the legal regime of genetic resources is outlined in the context of applicable rules relating to biological diversity. The purpose of the research is to confute the prospects for the formation of a universal legal regime for genetic resources, in the context of the draft UN Agreement on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biological Diversity in Areas beyond National Jurisdiction, and the possibilities of using regional mechanisms in this domain.The methodology of the research includes the formal legal, comparative, historical, systemic and structural methods. The authors analyze and examine applicable international legal sources, including the 1992 Convention on Biological Diversity and its 2010 Nagoya Protocol. On the basis of the systemic and structural method the authors carry out the analysis of the sources of international law related to the conservation and sustainable use of genetic and other biological resources.The main results. The international community’s interest in genetic resources results from the growing need to take more informed environmental decisions. The relevant universal legal basis, created by the 1992 Convention on Biological Diversity, does not provide answers to some important questions, including the detailed legal definition of the term “genetic resources”, though the relevant definition contained in the 1992 Convention remains the only one that has been accepted by a large number of states. It is possible that states will be able to develop a more concrete legal rules relating to the genetic resources in the course of negotiating the UN Agreement on the Conservation and Sustainable Use of Marine Biological Diversity in Areas beyond National Jurisdiction. However, the development of such a universal international treaty might require a lot of effort in order to reconcile the divergent interests of states.Conclusions. Based on the analysis of applicable international law, the authors assert that the generally outlined legal basis for conservation of biodiversity, laid down by the 1992 Convention, demands further detailing in the modern context. The UN process on the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction is likely to take considerable efforts of participating actors before the appropriate legal mechanisms are agreed upon. So regional legal regimes might be an appropriate way to ensure the efficient management of genetic resources taking into account peculiarities of each individual region.
遗传资源作为国际法的对象
本文审查遗传资源的法律制度是否在与生物多样性有关的适用规则的背景下概述。这项研究的目的是反驳在《联合国国家管辖范围以外地区海洋生物多样性养护和可持续利用协定》草案背景下形成遗传资源普遍法律制度的前景,以及在这一领域利用区域机制的可能性。研究方法包括形式法、比较法、历史法、系统法和结构法。作者分析和审查了适用的国际法律来源,包括1992年《生物多样性公约》及其2010年《名古屋议定书》。在系统法和结构法的基础上,对遗传资源和其他生物资源的保护和可持续利用的国际法渊源进行了分析。主要结果。国际社会对遗传资源的兴趣源于越来越需要作出更明智的环境决定。1992年《生物多样性公约》确立的相关普遍法律基础并没有对一些重要问题提供答案,包括“遗传资源”一词的详细法律定义,尽管1992年《公约》所载的相关定义仍然是唯一被许多国家接受的定义。各国有可能在《联合国国家管辖区外海洋生物多样性养护和可持续利用协定》的谈判过程中制定出与遗传资源有关的更具体的法律规则。然而,这样一个普遍的国际条约的发展可能需要大量的努力,以调和各国不同的利益。根据对适用国际法的分析,作者断言1992年《公约》规定的保护生物多样性的一般概述的法律基础需要在现代背景下进一步详细说明。联合国关于在国家管辖范围以外地区保护和可持续利用海洋生物多样性的进程可能需要参与各方作出相当大的努力,才能商定适当的法律机制。因此,考虑到每个区域的特点,区域法律制度可能是确保有效管理遗传资源的适当方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
66.70%
发文量
79
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信