BUILDING A POLICY FOR COMBATING CRIMINAL ACTS OF TERRORISM THROUGH THE DEATH PENALTY

Fajar Purwawidada
{"title":"BUILDING A POLICY FOR COMBATING CRIMINAL ACTS OF TERRORISM THROUGH THE DEATH PENALTY","authors":"Fajar Purwawidada","doi":"10.35973/jpl.v2i2.2331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Terrorism is an extraordinary crime that can cause an atmosphere of terror, widespread fear, and mass casualties for the community. The government makes policies to counter terrorism through Law no. 15 of 2003 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Terrorism, amended by Law no. 5 of 2018. The law provides for the death penalty for perpetrators of terrorism crimes. Nevertheless, the reality is that acts of terror in Indonesia are still happening and are increasing. The problem raised in this study is how to reconstruct the policy of countering terrorism through the death penalty. This legal research is normative juridical research with an empirical juridical approach. The types of data used include primary data and secondary data. Data collection techniques using documentary studies as secondary data and supported by primary data using the interview method. The analysis used is qualitative normative data analysis. Based on this research, the results show that terrorism crimes are committed by groups that are generally political victims; injustice, inequality, poverty, discrimination. The goal is to fight a mighty force that is impossible to fight openly. Implementing the death penalty for terrorism crimes does not provide a deterrent effect for perpetrators of terror acts in Indonesia. This happens because the lack of understanding of the characteristics of terrorism crimes and harsh actions actually lead to new, greater violence. The solution to this problem is to change the legal approach towards a sociological, persuasive and deradicalization approach","PeriodicalId":88325,"journal":{"name":"The journal of philosophy, science & law","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of philosophy, science & law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35973/jpl.v2i2.2331","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Terrorism is an extraordinary crime that can cause an atmosphere of terror, widespread fear, and mass casualties for the community. The government makes policies to counter terrorism through Law no. 15 of 2003 concerning the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Terrorism, amended by Law no. 5 of 2018. The law provides for the death penalty for perpetrators of terrorism crimes. Nevertheless, the reality is that acts of terror in Indonesia are still happening and are increasing. The problem raised in this study is how to reconstruct the policy of countering terrorism through the death penalty. This legal research is normative juridical research with an empirical juridical approach. The types of data used include primary data and secondary data. Data collection techniques using documentary studies as secondary data and supported by primary data using the interview method. The analysis used is qualitative normative data analysis. Based on this research, the results show that terrorism crimes are committed by groups that are generally political victims; injustice, inequality, poverty, discrimination. The goal is to fight a mighty force that is impossible to fight openly. Implementing the death penalty for terrorism crimes does not provide a deterrent effect for perpetrators of terror acts in Indonesia. This happens because the lack of understanding of the characteristics of terrorism crimes and harsh actions actually lead to new, greater violence. The solution to this problem is to change the legal approach towards a sociological, persuasive and deradicalization approach
制定通过死刑打击恐怖主义犯罪行为的政策
恐怖主义是一种非同寻常的犯罪,可以造成恐怖气氛、广泛的恐惧和社区的大规模伤亡。政府通过第11号法律制定反恐政策。2003年第15号关于根除恐怖主义犯罪行为的法令,经第866号法律修正。2018年第5号。法律规定对犯下恐怖主义罪行的人判处死刑。然而,现实情况是,印度尼西亚境内的恐怖行为仍在发生,而且还在增加。本研究提出的问题是如何通过死刑来重建反恐政策。这一法律研究是一种以经验法学方法进行的规范法学研究。所使用的数据类型包括主要数据和次要数据。使用文献研究作为辅助数据,并使用访谈法支持主要数据的数据收集技术。所使用的分析是定性的规范数据分析。基于这一研究,结果表明,恐怖主义犯罪是由通常是政治受害者的群体实施的;不公正、不平等、贫穷、歧视。目标是与一股不可能公开作战的强大力量作战。在印度尼西亚,对恐怖主义罪行实施死刑并不能对恐怖行为的犯罪者起到威慑作用。这是因为缺乏对恐怖主义犯罪特征的理解和严厉的行动实际上导致了新的、更大的暴力。解决这一问题的方法是将法律方法改为社会学的、有说服力的和去极端化的方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书