Regulation Negotiation

IF 0.6 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE

COMMONWEALTH & COMPARATIVE POLITICS Pub Date : 2022-10-20 DOI:10.15367/com.v10i1.527

Paula A. Duda

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the use of regulation negotiation as an alternative to traditional rule making processes in state level bureaucracies. Direct observation of the Special Protection Water Program regulation negotiations at the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection from January, 1995 through August, 1996, shows that regulation negotiation can only be applied to issues with clearly defined policy alternatives, a limited number of affected parties and a distinct but not imminent deadline. All parties must be willing to bargain or negotiated agreement will not be reached. On a positive note, a survey of regulation negotiation participants revealed that agency administrators, environmental advocacy groups, and the regulated business community all perceive real benefits in the process.

查看原文本刊更多论文

规定谈判

本文考察了在州一级官僚机构中使用监管谈判作为传统规则制定过程的替代方案。直接观察1995年1月至1996年8月在宾夕法尼亚州环境保护部进行的特殊保护水计划法规谈判表明，法规谈判只能适用于具有明确定义的政策选择、有限数量的受影响方和明确但不迫在眉睫的最后期限的问题。各方必须愿意讨价还价，否则谈判将无法达成协议。积极的一面是，一项对监管谈判参与者的调查显示，机构管理者、环境倡导团体和受监管的商界都在这一过程中感受到真正的利益。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

COMMONWEALTH & COMPARATIVE POLITICS POLITICAL SCIENCE-

CiteScore

1.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Long established as the leading publication in its field, the journal of Commonwealth and Comparative Politics contains scholarly articles which both report original research on the politics of Commonwealth countries and relate their findings to issues of general significance for students of comparative politics. The journal also publishes work on the politics of other states where such work is of interest for comparative politics generally or where it enables comparisons to be made with Commonwealth countries.